Inclusivity/exclusivity in Tango

References

1. Black, Laura W.
   2012 “How People Communicate During Deliberative Events.” InDemocracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, ed. byTina Nabatchi, John Gastil, Matt Leighninger, and G. Michael Weiksner, –. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899265.003.0004
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899265.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
2. Black, Laura W., and Anna Wiederhold
   2014 “Discursive Strategies of Civil Disagreement in Public Dialogue Groups.” Journal of Applied Communication Research ():–. 10.1080/00909882.2014.911938
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911938 [Google Scholar]
3. Bruxelles, Sylvie, and Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
   2004 “Coalitions in Polylogues.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00037‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00037-7 [Google Scholar]
4. Dávila, Arlene
   2012 Culture Works: Space, Value, and Mobility across the Neoliberal Americas. New York: New York University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, F. H. van
   2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
6. Egres, Dorottya
   2021 “Strategic Maneuvering in Extended Polylogues.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.20003.egr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20003.egr [Google Scholar]
7. Garcia, Angela C.
   2025 “Strategic Interruptions in Small Claim Mediation: How Precipitous Timing of Mediator Interventions Can Facilitate Conflict Resolution.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly, –. 10.1002/crq.70021
   https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.70021 [Google Scholar]
8. Goffman, Erving
   1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Greco, Sara
   2023 “Twitter Activists’ Argumentation through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion.” Argumentation: –.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Greco Morasso, Sara
    2011 Argumentation in Dispute Mediation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.3 [Google Scholar]
11. Hutchby, Ian
    1996 Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jackson, Sally
    1992 “Virtual Standpoints and the Pragmatics of Conversational Argument.” InArgumentation Illuminateded. byFrans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles Arthur Willard, –. Amsterdam: SicSat.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jackson, Sally
    2025 “Studying Controversies: A Path for Expansion of Argumentation Theory.” Argumentation:–. 10.1007/s10503‑025‑09671‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-025-09671-2 [Google Scholar]
14. Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson
    1981 “Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication:–. 10.1080/10570318109374035
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318109374035 [Google Scholar]
15. Jacobs, Scott, Jackson, Sally, and Xiaoqi Zhang
    2022 “What Was the President’s Standpoint and When Did He Take It? A Normative Pragmatic Study of Standpoint Emergence in a Presidential Press Conference.” Languages:, –. 10.3390/languages7020153
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020153 [Google Scholar]
16. Jamieson, Kathleen H.
    1988 “Incapacitating the Eloquent Speaker.” InEloquence in an Electronic Age: The Transformation of Political Speechmaking, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    2006 Metaphor We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lewiński, Marcin, and Mark Aakhus
    2014 “Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.” Argumentation:–. 10.1007/s10503‑013‑9307‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9307-x [Google Scholar]
19. Lewiński, Marcin, and Mark Aakhus
    2023 Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. McMains, Juliet
    2018 “Rebellious Wallflowers and Queer Tangueras: The Rise of Female Leaders in Buenos Aires’ Tango Scene.” Dance Research():–. 10.3366/drs.2018.0237
    https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2018.0237 [Google Scholar]
21. Musi, Elena, and Mark Aakhus
    2018 “Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining.” Argumentation():–. 10.1007/s10503‑017‑9441‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9441-y [Google Scholar]
22. Plass, Arno
    2022 “Queer Tango: A Lesson in Dialogical Embodiment.” Cultural Studies():–. 10.1080/09502386.2021.2012706
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.2012706 [Google Scholar]
23. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1990) “The Management of a Co-operative Self during Argument: The Role of Opinions and Stories.” InConflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. byAllen D. Grimshaw, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Tateo, Luca
    2014 “The Dialogical Dance: Self, Identity Construction, Positioning and Embodiment in Tango Dancers.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science:–. 10.1007/s12124‑014‑9258‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9258-2 [Google Scholar]
25. Tracy, Karen
    2001 “Discourse Analysis in Communication.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, –. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Tracy, Karen
    2012 “Public Hearing about the Same-Sex Marriage: How the Context “Makes” an Argument.” Qualitative Communication Research():–. 10.1525/qcr.2012.1.1.83
    https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2012.1.1.83 [Google Scholar]
27. Vasilyeva, Alena L.
    2015 “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue():–. 10.1075/ld.5.3.01vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.01vas [Google Scholar]
28. Vasilyeva, Alena L.
    2024 “Framing Interactivity in Complex Communication of Debate Talk Show.” Language and Dialogue():–. 10.1075/ld.00181.vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00181.vas [Google Scholar]
29. Weigand, Edda
    2006 “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation:–. 10.1007/s10503‑006‑9000‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4 [Google Scholar]