oa Revealing argumentative patterns underlying the genre-specific moves in research article introductions

References

1. Adnan, Zifirdaus
   2014 “Prospects of Indonesian Research Articles (RAs) Being Considered for Publication in ‘Center’ Journals: A Comparative Study of Rhetorical Patterns of RAs in Selected Humanities and Hard Science Disciplines.” InOccupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-Culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research, edited byAndrzej Łyda and Krystyna Warchał. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02526‑1_6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02526-1_6 [Google Scholar]
2. Afshar, Hassan Soodmand, Masoud Doosti, Hossein Movassagh, and Behzad A. Sina
   2018 “A Genre Analysis of the Introduction Section of Applied Linguistics and Chemistry Research Articles.” Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahlstrom, David
   2017 “How to Publish in Academic Journals: Writing a Strong and Organized Introduction Section.” Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (): –. 10.15549/jeecar.v4i2.180
   https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v4i2.180 [Google Scholar]
4. American Association for Applied Linguistics
   American Association for Applied Linguistics. n.d. “AAAL: About Us.” https://www.aaal.org/about-us
5. Amnuai, Wirada
   2019 “Analyses of Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Realizations in Accounting Research Article Abstracts Published in International and Thai-Based Journals.” SAGE Open (). 10.1177/2158244018822384
   https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384 [Google Scholar]
6. Andone, Corina, and Andrea Rocci
   eds. 2016 Argumentation in Journalism: Professional Practices and the Public Sphere. Special issue, Journal of Argumentation in Context (). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/jaic.5.1
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.1 [Google Scholar]
7. Andone, Corina, and Bart Garssen
   eds. 2022 Argumentation in European Politics. Special issue, Journal of Argumentation in Context (). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/jaic.5.1.001in
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.1.001in [Google Scholar]
8. Andrews, Richard
   2009 Argumentation in Higher Education. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203872710
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872710 [Google Scholar]
9. Arianto, M. Affandi, and Yazid Basthomi
   2021 “The Authors’ Research Gap Strategies in ELT Research Article Introductions: Does Scopus Journal Quartile Matter?” Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies (): –. 10.52462/jlls.127
   https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.127 [Google Scholar]
10. Arizavi, Saleh, Alireza Jalilifar, and A. Mehdi Riazi
    2023 “Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑022‑09588‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09588-0 [Google Scholar]
11. Arizavi, Saleh, Alireza Jalilifar, and A. Mehdi Riazi
    2025 “Argument Schemes and Soundness/Strength in Published Research Article Discussion Sections: A Chronological Study.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.23004.ari
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.23004.ari [Google Scholar]
12. Arsyad, Safnil, and Destiantari Adila
    2018 “Using Local Style When Writing in English: The Citing Behaviour of Indonesian Authors in English Research Article Introductions.” Asian Englishes (): –. 10.1080/13488678.2017.1327835
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2017.1327835 [Google Scholar]
13. Arsyad, Safnil, Muhammad Zaim, Syahrul Ramadhan, and Azhar Aziz Lubis
    2020 “The Argument Style of Research Article Discussions by Non-Native Authors of English Published in International Journals.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature (): –. 10.33369/joall.v5i2.11268
    https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.11268 [Google Scholar]
14. Arvay, Anett, and Gyula Tankó
    2004 “A Contrastive Analysis of English and Hungarian Theoretical Research Article Introductions.” IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (): –. 10.1515/iral.2004.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2004.003 [Google Scholar]
15. Bacha, Nahla Nola
    2010 “Teaching the Academic Argument in a University EFL Environment.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001 [Google Scholar]
16. Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi
    2016 Rigorous, Transparent, and Eye-Catching: Exploring the Universalistic Parameters of Impactful Theory Building in Management. PhD diss., Università della Svizzera italiana.
17. Bazerman, Charles
    1988 Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bermani, Resakti Alamsyah, Safnil Safnil, and Arono Arono
    2017 “An Analysis of Argument Structure of Research Article of English Postgraduate Program of Bengkulu University Published in Journal.” JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature) (): . 10.33369/joall.v2i2.5954
    https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i2.5954 [Google Scholar]
19. Bhatia, Vijay K.
    2014 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315844992
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844992 [Google Scholar]
20. Biber, Douglas, Thomas A. Upton, and Ulla Connor
    2007 Discourse on the Move. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
21. Bigi, Sarah, and Maria Grazia Rossi
    2025 “Future Perspectives in Medical Argumentation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.00035.big
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00035.big [Google Scholar]
22. Carter, Michael
    2016 “Value Arguments in Science Research Articles: Making the Case for the Importance of Research.” Written Communication (): –. 10.1177/0741088316653394
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316653394 [Google Scholar]
23. Çeşme, Hatice, and Oktay Yağız
    2020 “A Contrastive Rhetorical Analysis of Anglophone and Turkish Authors’ RA Introductions in ELT.” Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cheng, Wei-Ning
    2020 “Argument and Information Structures in Sociology Research Papers: Analysis of the Abstract and Introduction Sections.” PhD diss., Nanyang Technological University. 10.32657/10356/138530
    https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/138530
25. Cotos, Elena, Sarah Huffman, and Stephanie Link
    2015 “Furthering and Applying Move/Step Constructs: Technology-Driven Marshalling of Swalesian Genre Theory for EAP Pedagogy.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes: –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.004 [Google Scholar]
26. Crossley, Scott, Yu Tian, and Qian Wan
    2022 “Argumentation Features and Essay Quality: Exploring Relationships and Incidence Counts.” Journal of Writing Research (): –. 10.17239/jowr‑2022.14.01.01
    https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2022.14.01.01 [Google Scholar]
27. Duszak, Anna, and Jo Lewkowicz
    2008 “Publishing Academic Texts in English: A Polish Perspective.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.001 [Google Scholar]
28. Del Saz Rubio, M. Milagros
    2011 “A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences.” English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002 [Google Scholar]
29. Fahnestock, Jeanne
    1998 “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Communication (): –. 10.1177/0741088398015003006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015003006 [Google Scholar]
30. Fairclough, Norman
    2013 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315834368
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 [Google Scholar]
31. Farnia, Maryam, and Safoora Barati
    2017 “Writing Introduction Section of Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Cross-Cultural Study of Native and Non-Native Writers.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357
    https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357 [Google Scholar]
32. Farsani, Mohammad Amini, Hamid R. Jamali, Maryam Beikmohammadi, Babak Daneshvar Ghorbani, and Ladan Soleimani
    2021 “Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research synthesis and bibliometrics indicate?.” System: . 10.1016/j.system.2021.102547
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102547 [Google Scholar]
33. Farsani, Mohammad Amini, Paul Stapleton, and Hamid R. Jamali
    2025 “Charting L2 Argumentative Writing: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Second Language Writing: . 10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101208
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101208 [Google Scholar]
34. Feteris, Eveline T.
    2012 “The Role of the Judge in Legal Proceedings: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.1.2.05fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.2.05fet [Google Scholar]
35. Filimon, Agatha
    2011a “Argumentative Valences of the Key-Phrase Value Creation in Corporate Reporting.” InProceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden, and Gordon Mitchell, –. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Filimon, Agatha
    2011b “The Persuasiveness of Two-Sided Messages in Corporate Reporting Discourse.” Paper presented atCommunication and Cognition 2011: Manipulation, Persuasion and Deception in Language, Neuchâtel.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Flowerdew, John
    2014 Academic Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315838069
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838069 [Google Scholar]
38. Gao, Sutong, and Issra Pramoolsook
    2023 “A Cross-Cultural Move Analysis of Electronic Engineering Research Article Introductions: The Case of Chinese, Thai, and Native English Scholarly Writers.” Ampersand: . 10.1016/j.amper.2022.100106
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100106 [Google Scholar]
39. Garssen, Bart
    2011 “Argument Schemes.” InCrucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren, –. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Goodwin, Jean
    2002 “Designing Issues.” InDialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, –. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9948‑1_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_7 [Google Scholar]
41. Greco, Sara
    2011 Argumentation in Dispute Mediation: A Reasonable Way to Handle Conflict. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.3 [Google Scholar]
42. Greco, Sara
    2015 “Argumentation from Analogy in Migrants’ Decisions.” InScrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.9.15gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.15gre [Google Scholar]
43. Greco, Sara
    2016 “L’enfant dans la discussion: Questions de légitimité, de confiance et d’interprétation de sa parole.” FamPra.ch: –.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Greco, Sara
    2017 “Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑016‑9408‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9408-4 [Google Scholar]
45. Greco, Sara
    2023 “Twitter Activists’ Argumentation through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑022‑09579‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09579-1 [Google Scholar]
46. Greco, Sara, Chiara Mercuri, Barbara De Cock, and Rebecca Schär
    2023 “Arguing through Best Practice: The Role of Argumentation from Example in Activists’ Social Media Posts on Sustainable Fashion.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/14614456231163422
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231163422 [Google Scholar]
47. Harris, Randy Allen
    2021 The Linguistics Wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the Battle over Deep Structure. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199740338.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199740338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
48. Hautli-Janisz, Annette, Zlata Kikteva, Wiktoria Siskou, Katarzyna Gorska, Robert Becker, and Chris Reed
    2022 “QT30: A Corpus of Argument and Conflict in Broadcast Debate.” InProceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, –. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. 10.63317/4n6ua5xrt9p8
    https://doi.org/10.63317/4n6ua5xrt9p8 [Google Scholar]
49. Hernández, Alfonso
    2021 “Journalists’ Moves in Political Press Conferences and Their Implications for Accountability.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.20005.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20005.her [Google Scholar]
50. Hicks, Darrin
    ed. 2014 Argumentation in the Media. Special issue, Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.3.1
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hirano, Eliana
    2009 “Research Article Introductions in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English.” English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar]
52. Hyland, Ken
    2004 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Michigan Classicsed.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hyland, Ken
    2010 “English for Professional Academic Purposes: Writing for Scholarly Publication.” InEnglish for Professional and Academic Purposes, edited byMiguel F. Ruiz-Garrido, Juan Carlos Palmer-Silveira, and Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez, –. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Jalilifar, Alireza R.
    2010 “Research Article Introductions: Sub-Disciplinary Variations in Applied Linguistics.” Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Janier, Mathilde, John Lawrence, and Chris Reed
    2014 “OVA+: An Argument Analysis Interface.” InComputational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2014, edited bySimon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, –. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kanafani, Ashifa, Eri Kurniawan, and Arif Husein Lubis
    2022 “A Move Analysis of Abstracts in a Scopus-Indexed Applied Linguistics Journal from Different Quartiles.” RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kjeldsen, Jens E., Amos Kiewe, Marie Lund, and Jette Barnholdt Hansen
    2019 Speechwriting in Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑03685‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03685-0 [Google Scholar]
58. Latifi, Saeed, Omid Noroozi, Javad Hatami, and Harm J. A. Biemans
    2021 “How Does Online Peer Feedback Improve Argumentative Essay Writing and Learning?” Innovations in Education and Teaching International (): –. 10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005 [Google Scholar]
59. Lee, Sunyoung
    2001 A Contrastive Rhetoric Study of Korean and English Research Paper Introductions. PhD diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
60. Lewiński, Marcin
    ed. 2013 Argumentation in Political Deliberation. Special issue, Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/jaic.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.1 [Google Scholar]
61. Lewiński, Marcin, and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
    2019 “Introduction: Environmental Argumentation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.00004.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00004.int [Google Scholar]
62. Linqiong, Yan
    2017 “A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Governmental Crisis Communication: The Case of Disputes over a Proposed Chemical Project in Mainland China.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.17003.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17003.yan [Google Scholar]
63. Loi, Chek Kim
    2010 “Research Article Introductions in Chinese and English: A Comparative Genre-Based Study.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.09.004 [Google Scholar]
64. Loi, Chek Kim, and Moyra Sweetnam Evans
    2010 “Cultural Differences in the Organization of Research Article Introductions from the Field of Educational Psychology: English and Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010 [Google Scholar]
65. Lubis, Arif Husein
    2020 “The Argumentation Structure of Research Article ‘Findings and Discussion’ Sections Written by Non-Native English Speaker Novice Writers: A Case of Indonesian Undergraduate Students.” Asian Englishes (): –. 10.1080/13488678.2019.1669300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1669300 [Google Scholar]
66. Lucchini, Costanza, Andrea Rocci, and Olena Yaskorska-Shah
    2024 “Comparing Prefaced Questions across Activity Types: Journalists and Financial Analysts as Argumentative Questioners.” InDe l’argumentativité à l’argumentation, edited byThierry Herman, –. Lausanne: Peter Lang. https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1329461
    [Google Scholar]
67. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Chrysi Rapanta
    2019 The Logic of Academic Writing. Columbia: Wessex Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, and Chris Reed
    2017 “Argumentation schemes. History, classifications, and computational applications.” History, Classifications, and Computational Applications. Journal of Logics and their Applications(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Lucia Salvato
    2023 “Argumentation and the Interpretation of Religious Texts.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.22006.mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22006.mac [Google Scholar]
70. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1987 Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Martín, Pedro, and Isabel K. León Pérez
    2014 “Convincing Peers of the Value of One’s Research: A Genre Analysis of Rhetorical Promotion in Academic Texts.” English for Specific Purposes: –. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.09.002 [Google Scholar]
72. McHugh, Mary L.
    2012 “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic.” Biochemia Medica (): –. 10.11613/BM.2012.031
    https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031 [Google Scholar]
73. Mercuri, Chiara
    2023 “Characterization Frames Constructing Endoxa in Activists’ Discourse about the Public Controversy Surrounding Fashion Sustainability.” Topoi (): –. 10.1007/s11245‑023‑09909‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09909-2 [Google Scholar]
74. Moreno, Ana I., and John M. Swales
    2018 “Strengthening Move Analysis Methodology towards Bridging the Function-Form Gap.” English for Specific Purposes: –. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006 [Google Scholar]
75. Mur Dueñas, María Pilar
    2010 “A contrastive analysis of research article introductions in English and Spanish.” Revista canaria de estudios ingleses: –.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Musi, Elena, Debanjan Ghosh, and Smaranda Muresan
    2016 “Towards Feasible Guidelines for the Annotation of Argument Schemes.” InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016), edited byChris Reed, –. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W16‑2810
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-2810 [Google Scholar]
77. Oswald, Steve, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata
    eds. 2022 The Pandemic of Argumentation. Argumentation Library. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑91017‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4 [Google Scholar]
78. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press. n.d. “Applied Linguistics Journal.” https://elt.oup.com/catalogue/items/global/linguistics/applied_linguistics_journal
79. Palmieri, Rudi
    2014 “Corporate argumentation in takeover bids.” Journal of Argumentation in Context():–. 10.1075/jaic.4.3.06bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.3.06bre [Google Scholar]
80. Palmieri, Rudi
    2017 “The Role of Argumentation in Financial Communication and Investor Relations.” InThe Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations, edited byAlexander V. Laskin. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 10.1002/9781119240822.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119240822.ch4 [Google Scholar]
81. Palmieri, Rudi
    2024 “From Loci to Critical Questions: An AMT Approach to Argument Evaluation. Insights from the Domain of Corporate Controversies.” InProceedings of the 24th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, –. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 3769.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Palmieri, Rudi, Costanza Lucchini, Giulia D’Agostino, and Andrea Rocci
    2025 “Argumentation in Shareholder Activism: Context, Stock Issues and Argumentative Patterns.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.24007.pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.24007.pal [Google Scholar]
83. Palmieri, Rudi, and Johanna Miecznikowski
    2016 “Predictions in Economic-Financial News: Author’s Stance and Argumentative Loci.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.5.1.03pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.1.03pal [Google Scholar]
84. Palmieri, Rudi, and Elena Musi
    2020 “Trust-Repair Strategies in Crisis Rhetorical (Sub) Arenas: An Argumentative Perspective.” International Journal of Strategic Communication (): –. 10.1080/1553118X.2020.1805452
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1805452 [Google Scholar]
85. Parkinson, Jean
    2011 “The Discussion Section as Argument: The Language Used to Prove Knowledge Claims.” English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001 [Google Scholar]
86. Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly, Rebecca Schär, Sara Greco, Josephine Convertini, Antonio Iannaccone, and Andrea Rocci
    2019 “Shifting from a Monological to a Dialogical Perspective on Children’s Argumentation: Lessons Learned.” InArgumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies about Argumentative Discourse in Context, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/aic.17.12per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.12per [Google Scholar]
87. Pilgram, Roosmaryn
    2012 “Reasonableness of a Doctor’s Argument by Authority: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of the Specific Soundness Conditions.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.1.1.04pil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.04pil [Google Scholar]
88. Plantin, Christian
    2018 Dictionary of Argumentation: An Introduction to Argumentation Studies. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Plonsky, Luke
    2013 “Study Quality in SLA: An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition (): –. 10.1017/S0272263113000399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399 [Google Scholar]
90. Pollaroli, Chiara, and Andrea Rocci
    2015 “The Argumentative Relevance of Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor in Advertising.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.4.2.02pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.2.02pol [Google Scholar]
91. Riazi, A. Mehdi, and Mohammad Amini Farsani
    2024 “Mixed-Methods Research in Applied Linguistics: Charting the Progress through the Second Decade of the Twenty-First Century.” Language Teaching (): –. 10.1017/S0261444823000332
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000332 [Google Scholar]
92. Rigotti, Eddo
    2006 “Relevance of Context-Bound Loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage.” Argumentation: –. 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9034-2 [Google Scholar]
93. Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco
    2019 Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Argumentation Library 34. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04568‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5 [Google Scholar]
94. Rocci, Andrea
    2006 “Pragmatic Inference and Argumentation in Intercultural Communication.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/IP.2006.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2006.026 [Google Scholar]
95. Rocci, Andrea
    2017a “Types of Conversational Backgrounds and Arguments.” InModality in Argumentation: A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions, –. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1063‑1_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1063-1_5 [Google Scholar]
96. Rocci, Andrea
    2017b Modality in Argumentation: A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1063‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1063-1 [Google Scholar]
97. Rocci, Andrea
    2021 “Diagramming counterarguments: At the interface between discourse structure and argumentation structure.” InThe Language of Argumentation, ed. byRobbert Cozijn, Henk J. Pasma and Matthijs J. van den Hoven, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52907‑9_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_8 [Google Scholar]
98. Rustipa, Katharina, Sugeng Purwanto, and Fahrur Rozi
    2023 “Rhetorical Structures, Strategies, and Linguistic Features of Problem Statement to Promote a Teaching Writing Model.” Studies in English Language and Education (): –. 10.24815/siele.v10i2.30855
    https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.30855 [Google Scholar]
99. Samraj, Betty
    2005 “An Exploration of a Genre Set: Research Article Abstracts and Introductions in Two Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001 [Google Scholar]
100. Sánchez, Jorge Alberto
     2018 “Applicability and Variation of Swales’ CARS Model to Applied Linguistics Article Abstracts.” ELIA, no.: –. 10.12795/elia.2018.i18.09
     https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2018.i18.09 [Google Scholar]
101. SCImago Journal Rank
     SCImago Journal Rank 2025 “SJR: Scientific Journal Rankings.” https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php
102. Schär, Rebecca G.
     2021 An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/aic.19
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.19 [Google Scholar]
103. Schär, Rebecca, and Sara Greco
     2018 “The Emergence of Issues in Everyday Discussions between Adults and Children.” International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric (): –. 10.4018/IJSVR.2018010103
     https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSVR.2018010103 [Google Scholar]
104. Shaw, Philip
     2016 “Genre Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, edited byKen Hyland and Philip Shaw, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315657455‑23
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455-23 [Google Scholar]
105. Shehzad, Wasima
     2010 “Announcement of the Principal Findings and Value Addition in Computer Science Research Papers.” Ibérica, no.: –.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sheikh Asadi, Narjes
     2025 “Swales’ CARS Model (1990).” annotation manual. https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1330840
     [Google Scholar]
107. Soler-Monreal, Carmen, María Carbonell-Olivares, and Luz Gil-Salom
     2011 “A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions.” English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005 [Google Scholar]
108. Stöckl, Hartmut, and Assimakis Tseronis
     eds. 2024 Multimodal Argumentation. Special issue, Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.13.2
     [Google Scholar]
109. Swales, John M.
     1981 Aspects of Article Introductions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Swales, John M.
     1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Swales, John M.
     2004 Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
112. Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak
     1994 Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
113. Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak
     2004 Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. 2nd ed.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Tardy, Christine
     2023 Genre-Based Writing: What Every ESL Teacher Needs to Know. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Tarvirdizdeh, Zahra, and Vahid Nimehchisalem
     2021 “Rhetorical Structure in the Problem Statement Section of Iranian Postgraduate Students’ Research Projects.” Studies in English Language and Education (): –. 10.24815/siele.v8i2.19118
     https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19118 [Google Scholar]
116. Teufel, Simone
     1999 Argumentative Zoning: Information Extraction from Scientific Text. PhD diss., University of Edinburgh.
117. Teufel, Simone, Jean Carletta, and Marc Moens
     1999 “An Annotation Scheme for Discourse-Level Argumentation in Research Articles.” InProceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, –. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/977035.977051
     https://doi.org/10.3115/977035.977051 [Google Scholar]
118. Thanajirawat, Zirivarnphicha, and Chokchai Chuea-nongthon
     2022 “Move and Text Analysis of the Discussion Section in Humanities and Social Sciences Research Articles.” Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Toulmin, Stephen E.
     2003 The Uses of Argument. Updated ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005 [Google Scholar]
120. van Eemeren, Frans H.
     2016 “Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
121. van Eemeren, Frans H.
     2017a “Argumentative Patterns Viewed from a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.” InArgumentation in Context, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.02van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.02van [Google Scholar]
122. van Eemeren, Frans H.
     2017b “Context-Dependency of Argumentative Patterns in Discourse.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.6.1.01eem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.01eem [Google Scholar]
123. van Eemeren, Frans H.
     2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation Library 33. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
124. van Eemeren, Frans H.
     2019 “Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09478‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09478-y [Google Scholar]
125. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen
     2010 “Constraints on Political Deliberation: European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type.” InThe Functions of Argument and Social Context, edited byDennis S. Gouran, –. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
     [Google Scholar]
126. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen
     eds. 2020 From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Argumentation Library 35. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28367‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4 [Google Scholar]
127. van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels
     2009 Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Argumentation Library 16. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑2614‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9 [Google Scholar]
128. van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean Wagemans
     2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
129. van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, and Nanon Labrie
     2021 Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding Clinical Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.235
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.235 [Google Scholar]
130. van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Nanon Labrie, Ton Haaften, and Sara Greco
     . “Argumentative style” (2022): –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/aic.20
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.20 [Google Scholar]
131. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
     2016 Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315401140
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315401140 [Google Scholar]
132. van Eemeren, Frans H., Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, and Rob Grootendorst
     2002 Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410602442
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602442 [Google Scholar]
133. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
     2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
134. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
     2010 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
135. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
     2016 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 2nd ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315538662
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538662 [Google Scholar]
136. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
     2003 “The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1023/A:1026338402751
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026338402751 [Google Scholar]
137. Wagemans, Jean H. M.
     2016 “Argumentative Patterns for Justifying Scientific Explanations.” Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9374‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9374-2 [Google Scholar]
138. Walková, Milada, and Jody Bradford
     2022 “Constructing an Argument in Academic Writing across Disciplines.” ESP Today (): –. 10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.2
     https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.2 [Google Scholar]
139. Walton, Douglas
     2009 “Argumentation Theory: A Very Short Introduction.” InArgumentation in Artificial Intelligence, edited byGuillermo Simari and Iyad Rahwan, –. Boston: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98197‑0_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_1 [Google Scholar]
140. Wingate, Ursula
     2012 “‘Argument!’ Helping Students Understand What Essay Writing Is About.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 [Google Scholar]
141. Wolfe, Michael B., and Christopher A. Kurby
     2017 “Belief in the Claim of an Argument Increases Perceived Argument Soundness.” Discourse Processes (): –. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1137446
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1137446 [Google Scholar]
142. Zou, Hang, and Ken Hyland
     2019 “Reworking Research: Interactions in Academic Articles and Blogs.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445619866983
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619866983 [Google Scholar]