Political accountability in press conferences and social media

References

1. Anderson, Christopher, and Michael Schudson
   2019 “Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking.” InThe Routledge handbook of journalism studies, eds.Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, and Thomas Hanitzsch, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315167497‑9
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497-9 [Google Scholar]
2. Andone, Corina
   2013 Argumentation in political interviews. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.5
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
3. Andone, Corina
   2015 “Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability.” Argumentation: –. 10.1007/s10503‑014‑9334‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9334-2 [Google Scholar]
4. Anthony, Laurence
   2005 “AntConc: design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom.” InIPCC Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, –. IEEE. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494244
   https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494244 [Google Scholar]
5. Ardern, Jacinda
   2020, April7. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern holds a press conference to give an update on the Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand. Retrieved onDecember 1, 2022, fromhttps://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/new-zealand-covid-19-briefing-transcript-april-7
6. Arora, Swapan Deep, Guninder Pal Singh, Anirban Chakraborty, and Moutusy Maity
   2022 “Polarization and social media: A systematic review and research agenda.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change: . 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121942
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121942 [Google Scholar]
7. Bovens, Mark
   2007a “Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework.” European law journal, (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑0386.2007.00378.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x [Google Scholar]
8. Bovens, Mark
   2007b “New forms of accountability and EU-governance.” Comparative European Politics, : –. 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110101
   https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110101 [Google Scholar]
9. Bovens, Mark
   2010 “Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism.” West European Politics, (): –. 10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486119 [Google Scholar]
10. Carr, Caleb T., David B. Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman
    2012 “Speech acts within Facebook status messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (): –. 10.1177/0261927X12438535
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438535 [Google Scholar]
11. Clayman, Steven E., and Matthew P. Fox
    2017 “Hardballs and softballs: Modulating adversarialness in journalistic questioning.” Journal of Language and Politics, (): –. 10.1075/jlp.16.1.02cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.02cla [Google Scholar]
12. Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
    2002 “Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of communication, (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
13. Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
    2023 “Pressuring the President: Changing language practices and the growth of political accountability.” Journal of Pragmatics, : –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.014 [Google Scholar]
14. Demir, Yeliz
    2016 “Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event: The case of the Soma mine disaster.” Journal of Argumentation in Context, (): –. 10.1075/jaic.5.2.07dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.2.07dem [Google Scholar]
15. Eriksson, Göran, and Mats Eriksson
    2012 “Managing political crisis: an interactional approach to image repair”. Journal of Communication Management, (): –. 10.1108/13632541211245776
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245776 [Google Scholar]
16. Ettema, James S.
    2009 “New media and new mechanisms of public accountability.” Journalism, (): –. 10.1177/1464884909102591
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909102591 [Google Scholar]
17. Fox, Christopher
    1989 “A stop list for general text.” SIGIR Forum: –. 10.1145/378881.378888
    https://doi.org/10.1145/378881.378888 [Google Scholar]
18. Germano, Fabrizio, Vicenç Gómez, and Francesco Sobbrio
    2026 “Ranking for engagement: How social media algorithms fuel misinformation and polarization.” Journal of Public Economics: . 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105589
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105589 [Google Scholar]
19. Greco, Sara, Chiara Mercuri, Barbara De Cock, and Rebecca Schär
    2023 “Arguing through best practice: The role of argumentation from example in activists’ social media posts on sustainable fashion.” Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456231163422
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231163422 [Google Scholar]
20. Harcup, Tony
    2014 A dictionary of journalism. Cambridge, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hermida, Alfred, and Neil Thurman
    2008 “A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites.” Journalism practice, (): –. 10.1080/17512780802054538
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802054538 [Google Scholar]
22. Hernández, Alfonso
    2021 “Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability.” Journal of Argumentation in Context, (): –. 10.1075/jaic.20005.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20005.her [Google Scholar]
23. Hernández, Alfonso
    2024 “Journalists’ questions during crisis: Watchdogs or disseminators of information?”. Journal of Argumentation in Context, (): –. 10.1075/jaic.00024.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00024.her [Google Scholar]
24. Hong, Sounman, and Sun Hyoung Kim
    2016 “Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments.” Government Information Quarterly, (): –. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007 [Google Scholar]
25. Hutto, Clayton, and Eric Gilbert
    2014 “Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text.” InProceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, (): –. 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
    https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 [Google Scholar]
26. Korson, Cadey
    2015 “Political agency and citizen journalism: Twitter as a tool of evaluation.” The Professional Geographer, (): –. 10.1080/00330124.2014.970839
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.970839 [Google Scholar]
27. Lewiński, Marcin, and Mark Aakhus
    2014 “Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry.” Argumentation, : –. 10.1007/s10503‑013‑9307‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9307-x [Google Scholar]
28. McGuire, David, James E. A. Cunningham, Kae Reynolds, and Gerri Matthews-Smith
    2020 “Beating the virus: an examination of the crisis communication approach taken by New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern during the Covid-19 pandemic.” Human Resource Development International, (): –. 10.1080/13678868.2020.1779543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1779543 [Google Scholar]
29. Miller, Serena
    2019 “Citizen journalism.” InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, ed.Powers, Matthew. New York: Oxford Academic. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.786
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.786 [Google Scholar]
30. Mohammed, Dima
    2016 “What’s in a good argument about evaluative claims? Argumentation in accountability practices.” Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol.. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mohammed, Dima
    2018a Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.15 [Google Scholar]
32. Mohammed, Dima
    2018b “Exercising accountability in European Parliamentary debates on statements: An argumentative perspective.” InArgumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations, eds.Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman, and Jérôme Jacquin: –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑73972‑4_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_11 [Google Scholar]
33. Mulgan, Richard
    2003 Holding power to account: accountability in modern democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781403943835
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403943835 [Google Scholar]
34. Murthy, Dhiraj
    2011 “Twitter: Microphone for the masses?” Media, culture & society, (): –. 10.1177/0163443711404744
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711404744 [Google Scholar]
35. Musi, Elena, Andrea Rocci
    2022 “Staying up to date with fact and reason checking: an argumentative analysis of outdated news.” InThe Pandemic of Argumentation, eds.Oswald, Steve, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata: –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑91017‑4_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_16 [Google Scholar]
36. Neu, Dean, and Gregory D. Saxton
    2023 “Twitter-Based Social Accountability Callouts.” Journal of Business Ethics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Paasch-Colberg, Sünje, Joachim Trebbe, Christian Strippel, and Martin Emmer
    2022 “Insults, Criminalisation, and Calls for Violence: Forms of Hate Speech and Offensive Language in German User Comments on Immigration.” InCyberhate in the Context of Migrations, eds.Monnier, Angeliki, Axel Boursier, and Annabelle Seoane: –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑92103‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92103-3_6 [Google Scholar]
38. Pang, Bo, and Lillian Lee
    2008 Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Delft: Now Publishers. 10.1561/9781601981516
    https://doi.org/10.1561/9781601981516 [Google Scholar]
39. Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea
    2016 “Pragmemes in the Sociolinguistic Interview: A Case Study on Expanded Polar Answers.” InPragmemes and Theories of Language Use, eds.Capone, Alessandro, Keith Allan, Louise Cummings, Wayne A. Davis, Igor Douven, Yan Huang, Istvan Kecskes : –. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_19 [Google Scholar]
40. Rocci, Andrea
    2021 “Diagramming counterarguments: At the interface between discourse structure and argumentation structure.” InThe language of argumentation, eds.Boogaart, R., Jansen, H., & Van Leeuwen, M. (pp.-). Springer, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rigotti, Edo and Andrea Rocci
    2006 “Towards a definition of communication context.” Studies in communication sciences, (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Roginsky, Sandrine, and Barbara De Cock
    2015 Faire campagne sur twitter. Les Cahiers du numérique, (): –. 10.3166/lcn.11.4.119‑144
    https://doi.org/10.3166/lcn.11.4.119-144 [Google Scholar]
43. Sambrook, Richard
    2005 “Citizen Journalism and the BBC.” Nieman Reports, (): .
    [Google Scholar]
44. Taboada, Maite
    2016 “Sentiment analysis: An overview from linguistics.” Annual Review of Linguistics, : –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011415‑040518
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040518 [Google Scholar]
45. Tseronis, Assimakis
    2025 Analysing multimodal argumentation: Theoretical and methodological considerations. InQualitative Research Methods in Argumentation Studies, eds.Andone, Corina, Marianne Doury, Sara Greco, Kati Hannken-Illjes, and Menno Reijven: –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003502296‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003502296-9 [Google Scholar]
46. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2018 Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
47. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    1987 “Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.” Argumentation, : –. 10.1007/BF00136779
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136779 [Google Scholar]
48. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Van Eemeren, Frans, Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    2007 Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6244‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5 [Google Scholar]
50. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Ton van Haaften
    2023 “The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View.” Argumentation: –. 10.1007/s10503‑023‑09618‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09618-5 [Google Scholar]
51. Wall, Melissa
    2015 “Citizen Journalism: A retrospective on what we know, an agenda for what we don’t.” Digital journalism, (): –. 10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513 [Google Scholar]
52. Ward, Stephen. J.
    2019 “Journalism ethics.” InThe handbook of journalism studies, eds.Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, and Thomas Hanitzsch: –. New York Routledge. 10.4324/9781315167497‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497-20 [Google Scholar]
53. Weaver, David and Lars Wilhoit
    1996 The American journalist in the 1990s: US news people at the end of an era. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Zampa, Marta
    2016 “Objectivity in newsmaking: an argumentative perspective”. InProceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18–21 May 2016. Eds. Bondy, Patrick and Laura Benacquista: –. Windsor: OSSA.
    [Google Scholar]