Ihnen Jory, C. (2012). Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament. | John Benjamins

1887

Volume 3, Issue 3

ISSN 2211-4742
E-ISSN: 2211-4750

USD

Ihnen Jory, C. (2012). Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament.
Author(s): Ton van Haaften
Source: Journal of Argumentation in Context, Volume 3, Issue 3, Jan 2014, p. 333 - 335
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.3.06haa

There is no abstract available for this article.

© 2014 John Benjamins Publishing Company

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.3.3.06haa

2014-01-01

2020-11-30

From This Site

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.3.3.06haa

dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword

-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution

10

5

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.3.3.06haa

Article Type: Book Review

Most Cited

- The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising
  
  Author(s): Chiara Pollaroli and Andrea Rocci
- Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making
  
  Author(s): A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans and D. Mohammed
- Adult as a source of expert opinion in child’s argumentation during family mealtime conversations
  
  Author(s): Antonio Bova
- Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and what
  
  Author(s): Sara Rubinelli and Claudia Zanini
- Pursuing multiple goals in European Parliamentary Debates: EU immigration policies as a case in point
  
  Author(s): Dima Mohammed
- Attachment style, serial argument, and taking conflict personally
  
  Author(s): Dale Hample and Adam S. Richards
- Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication-information services
  
  Author(s): Mark Aakhus
- Arguing with oneself
  
  Author(s): Marta Zampa and Daniel Perrin
- Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases
  
  Author(s): Marcin Lewiński
- Deontic power and institutional contexts
  
  Author(s): Isabela Fairclough
More Less

This is a required field

Please enter a valid email address

Approval was successful

Invalid data

An Error Occurred

Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error