Argumentation-based literary translation quality assessment

References

1. Apter, Emily
   2013 Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. London and New York: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Angelelli, Claudia V. , and Holly E. Jacobson
   (eds) 2009 Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xiv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xiv [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Mona
   2006 Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mona
   2010 Critical Readings in Translation Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bassnett, Susan
   2014 Translation: The New Critical Idiom. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berman, Antoine
   1985 “Translations and the Trials of the Foreign.” InThe Translation Studies Reader, 3rd ed., edited and translated by Lawrence Venuti (2012), 240–253. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blair, Anthony J
   2012 Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑2363‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4 [Google Scholar]
8. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1983 “The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed”, (Trans. R. Nice ). Poetics12: 311–356. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(83)90012‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8 [Google Scholar]
9. Kharmandar, Mohammad Ali
   2014 “Exploring Archaism in Translation Theory and Modern Persian Poetics: Towards a Persian Translation Paradigm”. Iranian Journal of Translation Studies12 (42): 40–56.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kharmandar, Mohammad Ali
    (2015) Ricoeur’s extended hermeneutic translation theory: Metaphysics, narrative, ethics, politics. Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, 6(1): 73–93. doi: 10.5195/errs.2015.281
    https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2015.281 [Google Scholar]
11. Danesi, Marcel , and Andrea Rocci
    2009 Global Linguistics: An Introduction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214048 [Google Scholar]
12. Edwards, Philip
    (ed.) 2003 Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Garssen, Bart
    2013 “Strategic Maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate.” Journal of Argumentation in Context2 (1): 33–46. doi: 10.1075/jaic.2.1.02gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.1.02gar [Google Scholar]
14. Hietanen, Mika
    2007 Paul’s Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. London: T & T Clark.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hietanen, Mika
    2011 “The Gospel of Matthew as a Literary Argument.” Argumentation25 (1): 63–86. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑010‑9198‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9198-z [Google Scholar]
16. House, Juliane
    2009 Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Inghilleri, Moira
    2005 “The Sociology of Bourdieu and the Construction of the ‘Object’ in Translation and Interpreting Studies.” The Translator11 (2): 125–145. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195 [Google Scholar]
18. Maulana Jalalu-‘d-din Muhammad Rumi
    . “masnav e ma’navi”. InMasnavi Ma’navi (2002) [CD]. Ghom: Noor Computer Services Company.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Martinez Melis, Nicole , and Hurtado Albir, Amparo
    2001 “Assessment in Translation Studies: Research Needs.” Meta46 (2): 272–287. doi: 10.7202/003624ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003624ar [Google Scholar]
20. Mirdal, M. Gretty
    2010  Mevlana Jalal-ad-Dın Rumi and mindfulness. J Relig Health51: 1202–1215. doi: 10.1007/s10943‑010‑9430‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9430-z [Google Scholar]
21. Munday, Jeremy
    2012 Evaluation in Translation: Critical Points of Translator Decision-Making. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nasri, Mansour
    1968 “The Interpretation and Explication of Masnavi, Vol. 1. Tehran: Gutenberg.” InMasnavi Ma’navi (2002) [CD]. Ghom: Noor Computer Service Company.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Page, Norman
    2004 “Larger Hopes and the New Hedonism: Tennyson and FitzGerald.” InEdward FitzGerald’s The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám, ed. By Harold Bloom , 151–168. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pym, Anthony
    2014 Exploring Translation Theories, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Selim, Samah
    2010 “Pharoah’s Revenge: Translation, Literary History and Colonial Ambivalence.” InCritical Readings in Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker , 319–336.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sharifian, Farzad
    2011 Cultural Conceptualizations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/clscc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
27. Snoeck Henkemans, A Francisca
    2010 “‘Anyway’ and ‘even’ as Indicators of Complex Argumentation.” Cogency2 (1): 81–94.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Van Eemeren, Frans H
    2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
29. Van Eemeren, Frans H. , and Bart Garssen
    2008 Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cvs.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6 [Google Scholar]
30. Van Eemeren, Frans H. , and Rob Grootendorst
    1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
31. Van Eemeren, Frans H. , Peter Houtlosser , and Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
    (ed.) 2007 Argumentative Indicators: A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Van Eemeren, Frans H. , Bart Grassen , Erik C.W. Krabbe , Snoeck Henkemans , A. Francisca, Bart Verheij , and Jean H.M. Wagemans
    2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
33. Venuti, Lawrence
    2012 “Genealogies of Translation Theory: Jerome.” InTranslation Studies Reader, 3rd ed., ed. by Lawrence Venuti , 483–502. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Venuti, Lawrence
    (ed.) 2012a Translation Studies Reader, 3rd ed.London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Whinefield, E.H
    1898 Masnavi Translated and Abridged. Retrieved February 12, 2014, fromwww.thesufi.com/2011_Sufism_Ebooks/mevlana_rumi_ebooks/masnavi_b1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
36. Williams, Malcolm
    2001 “The Application of Argumentation Theory to Translation Quality Assessment.” Meta2: 328–343.
    [Google Scholar]