Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Brockriede, W
    1974 “Rhetorical Criticism as Argument.” Quarterly Journal of Speech60: 165–174. doi: 10.1080/00335637409383222
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383222 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke, K
    1937Attitudes Toward History. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fogelin, R.J
    1982Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Formal Logic, 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Leff, M
    (ed) 2008 “David Zarefsky and Reasonable Argument.” Special issue ofArgumentation & Advocacy45: 61–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mercier, H. , and D. Sperber
    2011 “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences34: 57–111. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968 [Google Scholar]
  6. Olson, K. , M.W. Pfau , B. Ponder , and K.H. Wilson
    (eds) 2012Making the Case: Advocacy and Judgment in Public Argument. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Palczewski, C.H. , and J. Fritch
    (eds) 2012 Forum: Argument Scholars Respond to Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Human Reason. Argumentation & Advocacy48, 174–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Perelman, C. , and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1969The New Rhetoric: A Treatise On Argumentation, ed. by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver (Trans.)Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zarefsky, D
    2014Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑05485‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05485-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2009 “What does an Argument Culture Look Like?” Informal Logic29: 296–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2006 “Strategic Maneuvering Through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric.” Argumentation20: 399–416. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9030‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9030-6 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error