Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event

References

1. Andone, C
   2013 Argumentation in Political Interviews: Analyzing and Evaluating Responses to Accusations of Inconsistency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.5
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
2. Andone, C
   2015 “The Burden of Proof in Dealing with Political Accountability.” InPersuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue, ed. by R. Săftoiu , M.-I. Neagu , and S. Măda , 19–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.26.02and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.02and [Google Scholar]
3. APA (American Press Association)
   2016 Principles of Journalism. RetrievedJanuary 20, 2016, fromamericanpressassociation.com/principles-of-journalism/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Besette, J.M
   2001 “Accountability: Political.” InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. by N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes , 38–41. Retrieved fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767010913. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/01091‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01091-3 [Google Scholar]
5. Bhatia, A
   2006 “Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences.” Discourse and Society17 (2): 173–203. doi: 10.1177/0957926506058057
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058057 [Google Scholar]
6. Clayman, S
   2006 “Arenas of Interaction in the New Media Era.” InNews from the Interview Society, ed. by M. Ekström , Å. Kroon , and M. Nylund , 239–264. Göteborg: Nordicom.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clayman, S. , and Heritage, J
   2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
8. CSGB
   . 6331 Sayılı İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kanunu [Law No. 6331 Occupational Health and Safety Law]. RetrievedNovember 8, 2015, fromwww.csgb.gov.tr/csgbPortal/ShowProperty/WLP%20Repository/csgb/dosyalar/kitap/kitap03_6331. English translation: www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/MONOGRAPH/92011/106963/F1028231731/TUR92011%20Eng.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dutwin, D
   2003 “The Character of Deliberation: Equality, Argument, and the Formation of Public Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research15 (3): 239–264. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/15.3.239
   https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.3.239 [Google Scholar]
10. van Eemeren, F.H
    2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
11. van Eemeren, F.H. , and Grootendorst, R
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. van Eemeren, F.H. , and Houtlosser, P
    1997 “Rhetorical Rationales for Dialectical Moves.” InProceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, ed. by J.F. Klumpp , 51–56. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
13. van Eemeren, F.H. , and Houtlosser, P
    2002 “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” InDialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, ed. by F.H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser , 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
14. van Eemeren, F.H. , and Houtlosser, P
    2005 “Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.” InThe Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at Mcmaster University, ed. by D. Hitchcock and D. Farr , 75–84. Hamilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Erdem, K. , and Solak, M
    2012 The Grand National Assembly of Turkey. RetrievedJanuary 15, 2016, fromhttps://www.tbmm.gov.tr/yayinlar/yabanci_diller/TBMM_Ingilizce.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eriksson, G
    2011 “Follow-up Questions in Political Press Conferences.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 3331–3344. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.004 [Google Scholar]
17. Eshbaugh-Soha, M
    2003 “Presidential Press Conferences over Time.” American Journal of Political Science47: 348–353. doi: 10.1111/1540‑5907.00024
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00024 [Google Scholar]
18. Eshbaugh-Soha, M
    2012 “The Politics of Presidential Press Conferences.” American Politics Research41 (3): 471–497. doi: 10.1177/1532673X12462450
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X12462450 [Google Scholar]
19. Excerpts from President’s Remarks on Investigation into Attacks
    2001, September14. The New York Times. RetrievedNovember 20, 2015, fromwww.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/us/excerpts-from-president-s-remarks-on-investigation-into-attacks.html
    [Google Scholar]
20. God-given Nature. RetrievedMay 27, 2015, fromwww.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=9604
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goffman, E
    1986 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press. (Original work published in 1974.)
    [Google Scholar]
22. Harris, S
    1986 “Interviewers’ Questions in Broadcast Interviews.” InBelfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, ed. by J. Wilson and B. Crow , 50–85. Jordanstown: University of Ulster.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hinck, E.A
    1993 Enacting the Presidency: Political Argument, Presidential Debates, and Presidential Character. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jasinski, J.L
    2001 Sourcebook on Rhetoric: Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies. California: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781452233222
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233222 [Google Scholar]
25. Lanoue, D.J. , and Schrott, P.R
    1991 The Joint Press Conference: The History, Impact, and Prospects of American Presidential Debates. New York: Greenwood Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sapir, E
    1934 “Symbolism.” InEncyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, ed. by E.R.A. Seligman , 492–495. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Smith, C
    1990 Presidential Press Conferences: A Critical Approach. New York: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
28. TMMOB
    2014, 18September. “TMMOB Soma maden kazası raporunu açıkladı [TMMOB declared the report on the Soma mine accident]”. InThe official website of the Chamber of the Mining Engineers of Turkey. RetrievedJune 26, 2015from, www.maden.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=9432
    [Google Scholar]
29. Thornborrow, J
    2002 Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Zarefsky, D
    2008 “Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation.” Argumentation22: 317–330. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑008‑9096‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9096-9 [Google Scholar]