Eugen Octav Popa (2016). Thought Experiments in Academic Communication. A Pragma-Dialectical Method for Reconstructing the Argumentative Use of Imaginary Scenarios in Academic Disputes

References

1. Eemeren, F.H. van
   (2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
2. Eemeren, F.H. van , and R. Grootendorst
   1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783110846089
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
3. Eemeren, F.H. van , and R. Grootendorst
   2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kuhn, T.S
   1977a A function for thought experiments. InThe Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition, 240–265. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kuhn, T.S
   (1977b) The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. InThe Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition, 225–240. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Norton, J.D
   (1996) Are thought experiments just what you thought?Canadian Journal of Philosophy26 (3): 333–366. doi: 10.1080/00455091.1996.10717457
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1996.10717457 [Google Scholar]