The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament

References

1. Copi, I. M.
   (1982) Introduction to logic. New York/London: Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Eemeren, F. H. van
   (2016) Identifying argumentative patterns. A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
3. Eemeren, F. H. van
   (2017) Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.). Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eemeren, F. H. van , & Garssen, B.
   (2010) In varietate concordia – United in diversity. European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19–37.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, F. H. van , & Garssen, B.
   (2014) Argumentation by analogy in stereotypical argumentative patterns. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy (pp.41–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Garssen. B. J.
   (1997) Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek[Argument schemes in a pragma-dialectical perspective. A theoretical and empirical study]. Doctoral dissertation University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam: IFOTT.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Garssen, B.
   (2016) Problem-solving argumentative patterns in plenary debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9378‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9378-y [Google Scholar]
8. Hastings, A. C.
   (1962) A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Doctoral dissertation Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Jackson, S.
   (1986) Building a case for claims about discourse structure. In: D. G. Ellis & W. A. Donohane (Eds.). Contemporary issues in language and discourse (pp.129–147). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kruger, A. N.
    (1960) Modern debate, its logic and strategy. New York etc.: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Perelman, Ch. , & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
    (1969) The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Plug, H. J.
    (2010) The strategic use of argumentation from example in plenary debates in the European Parliament. Controversia, 7 (1), 38–56.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Schellens, P. J.
    (1985) Redelijke argumenten. Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers[Reasonable arguments. A study of norms for critical readers]. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]