Argumentative patterns in the European Union’s directives

References

1. Beck, G.
   (2012) The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Börzel, T.
   (2001) ‘Non-compliance in the European Union: pathology or statistical artefact?’, Journal of European Public Policy8(5): 803–824. doi: 10.1080/13501760110083527
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110083527 [Google Scholar]
3. Börzel, T.
   (2002) ‘Pace-setting, foot-dragging, and fence-sitting: Member State responses to Europeanization’, JMCS40(2): 193–214.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Craig, P. , and de Búrca, G.
   (2015) EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (6th edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/he/9780198714927.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198714927.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Dimitrakopoulos, D. G.
   (2001) ‘The Transposition of EU law: ‘post-decisional politics’ and institutional autonomy’, European Law Journal7(4): 442–458. doi: 10.1111/1468‑0386.00137
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00137 [Google Scholar]
6. Dimitrova, A. and Rhinard, M.
   (2005) ‘The power of norms in the transposition of EU directives’, European Integration Online Papers9(16): 1–22.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eemeren, F.H. van
   (2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
8. Eemeren, F.H. van
   (2016) ‘Identifying argumentative patterns: a vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics’. Argumentation30(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
9. Eemeren, F. H. van , and Grootendorst, R.
   (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Falkner, G. , Hartlapp, M. , Leiber, S. , and Treib, O.
    (2004) ‘Non-compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: opposition through the backdoor’, West European Politics27(3): 452–473. doi: 10.1080/0140238042000228095
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000228095 [Google Scholar]
11. Falkner, G. , Treib, O. , Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S.
    (2005) Complying with Europe. EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511491931
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491931 [Google Scholar]
12. Fischer, F. , and H. Gottweis
    (2012) ‘Introduction. The Argumentative Turn Revisited’, in Fischer, F. , and Gottweis, H. (eds), The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice, Durham: Duke University Press, pp.1–30. doi: 10.1215/9780822395362‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395362-001 [Google Scholar]
13. Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H.
    eds (2012) The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice, Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822395362
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395362 [Google Scholar]
14. Fischer, F. , and Forester, J.
    eds (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822381815
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381815 [Google Scholar]
15. Knill, C. , and Lehmkuhl, D.
    (2002) ‘The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: three Europeanization mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research41: 255–280. doi: 10.1111/1475‑6765.00012
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00012 [Google Scholar]
16. Komárek, J.
    (2015) ‘Legal Reasoning in EU Law’, in Arnull, A. , and Chalmers, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.28–51.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Majone, G.
    (1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mastenbroek, E.
    (2005) ‘EU compliance: still a ‘black hole’?’, Journal of European Public Policy12(6): 1103–1120. doi: 10.1080/13501760500270869
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500270869 [Google Scholar]
19. Mastenbroek, E.
    (2007) The Politics of Compliance. Explaining the Transposition of EC Directives in the Netherlands, Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen BV.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Nicolaides, Ph. , and Oberg, H.
    (2006) ‘The compliance problem in the European Union’, EIPASCOPE1: 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Prechal, A.
    (2005) Directives in EC Law. (Second, completely revised edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sauter, W.
    (2013) ‘Proportionality in EU Law: A balancing act?’, Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit: 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Scharpf, F.W.
    (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Shapiro, M.
    (1992) The Giving Reasons Requirement, U Chicago Legal Forum179, 179–220.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Searle, J. R. , and Vanderveken, D.
    (1985/2009) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Steunenberg, B. and Rhinard, M.
    (2010) ‘The transposition of European Law in EU Member States: between process and politics’, European Political Science Review2(3), 495–520. doi: 10.1017/S1755773910000196
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000196 [Google Scholar]
27. Thomann, E.
    (2015) ‘Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation’, Journal of European Public Policy22(10): 1368–1387. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008554
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1008554 [Google Scholar]
28. Treaty on European Union (TEU)
    Treaty on European Union (TEU), available atEur-lex.europa.eu (accessed29 February 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)
    Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), available atEur-lex.europa.eu. (accessed29 February 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Versluis, E.
    (2004) ‘Explaining variations in implementation of EU directives’, European Integration Online Papers8(19): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Zhelyazkova, A.
    (2012) Compliance under Controversy. Analysis of the Transposition of European Directives and their Provisions, Zutphen: CPI Wöhrmann Print Service.
    [Google Scholar]