Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.) (2015). Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice

References

1. Brennan, N. M. , C. Daly , & C. Harrington
   (2010) Rhetoric, Argument and Impression Management in Hostile Takeover Defence Documents. British Accounting Review42(4), 253–268. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.07.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.07.008 [Google Scholar]
2. Eemeren, F. H. van
   (Ed.) (2009) Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.1
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.1 [Google Scholar]
3. Eemeren, F. H. van & B. J. Garssen
   (Eds.) (2012) Exploring argumentative contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.4
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.4 [Google Scholar]
4. Eemeren, F. H. van & B. J. Garssen
   (Eds.) (2015) Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. New York/Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21103‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9 [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, F. H. van & R. Grootendorst
   (2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Greco, S.
   (2016) Book review of “Eemeren, F. H. van & B. J. Garssen (Eds.) (2015), op. cit.”. Argumentation31, 213–220.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Green, S. E.
   (2004) A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Muller-Mirza & A. N. Perret-Clermont
   (Eds.) (2009) Argumentation and Education. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98125‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3 [Google Scholar]
9. Rigotti, E. & S. Greco Morasso
   (2010) Comparing the Argumentum-Model of Topics with other contemporary approaches to argument schemes; the procedural and the material components. Argumentation24(4), 489–512. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑010‑9190‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7 [Google Scholar]