Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Eemeren, Frans H. van
    (2012) “The role of logic in analyzing and evaluating argumentation.” In H. Jales Ribeiro , coord., Inside arguments: Logic and the study of argumentation (pp.139–156). Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2006) The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter , coords., Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp.351–382). Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eemeren, Frans H. van , Garssen, Bart , & Wagemans, Jean
    (2012) The pragma-dialectical method of analysis and evaluation. En R. C. Rowland , coord., Reasoned argument and social change (pp.25–47). Washington (DC): National Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Eemeren, Frans H. van
    (2013) Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understanding and critical assessment. Special issue Journal of Pragmatics, 59(B), 141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Eemeren, Frans H. van , Garssen, Bart , & Meuffels, Bert
    (2012) The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(3), 344–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error