1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/jaic.6.2.10gre-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.6.2.10gre
2017-10-16
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, D. L. , Eash, T. , Schuette, J. L. , & Uhlmann, W. R.
    (2002) Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Genetic Counseling11, 399–418. doi: 10.1023/A:1016841731426
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016841731426 [Google Scholar]
  2. Eemeren, F. H. van
    (2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P.
    (2002a) Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.131–159. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9948‑1_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_10 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2002b) Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Advances in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. Newport New: Vale Press, pp.13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Green, N. L.
    (2012) Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing. Journal of Argumentation in Context1(1), 113–129. doi: 10.1075/jaic.1.1.09gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.09gre [Google Scholar]
  6. Green, N. , Dwight, R. , Navoraphan, K. , & Stadler, B.
    (2011) Natural language generation of transparent arguments for lay audiences. Argument and Computation2, 23–50. doi: 10.1080/19462166.2010.515037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2010.515037 [Google Scholar]
  7. Green, N. & Stadler, B.
    (2013) Adding coping-related strategies to biomedical argumentation in computer-generated genetic counseling patient letters. Patient Education and Counseling92(2), 149–152. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.6.2.10gre
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error