Dániel Z. Kádár. (2017). Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction

References

1. Bousfield, D.
   (2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
2. Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C.
   (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
3. Culpeper, J.
   (1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
4. Eelen, G.
   (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gu, Y.
   (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
6. Haugh, M.
   (2015) Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110240078
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240078 [Google Scholar]
7. Ide, S.
   (1989) Formal forms and ‘discernment’: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2/3), 223–248. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
   https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
8. Kádár, D. Z.
   (2013) Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
9. Kádár, D. Z. , & Haugh, M.
   (2013) Understanding Politeness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
10. Leech, G.
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Locher, M. A. , & Watts, R. J.
    (2008) Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Bousfield, D. , Locher, M. A. (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.77–99.
    [Google Scholar]