Volume 29, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0957-6851
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9838
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Nowadays, international communication using English as the medium is a common occurrence. To communicate effectively, English as a second language (ESL) speakers need to possess relevant communicative skills including understanding and being familiar with inner circle accents. This paper seeks to find out ESL learners’ evaluative reactions to four inner circle accents, representing British, American, Australian and New Zealand English varieties, through an accent perception and a survey task conducted on Malaysian undergraduates at a public university in Malaysia. The participants responded to descriptors on speaker attributes categorized into three dimensions: and while or after listening to a recorded passage read in one of the four accents by male and female speakers. The learners showed a tendency to prefer certain accents more than others. In general, the best rated accent was the British accent for the male speakers and the American accent for the female speakers. The New Zealand accent was rated the lowest among the male speakers and one of the lowest among the female speakers. The study also found that speaker’s competence, speaker’s social appeal and accent preference were positively correlated. These findings highlight the importance of listening practices and exposure to various English accents in ESL classrooms to prepare students for international and intercultural communication.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ahmed, Z. T., Abdullah, A. N., & Chan, S. H.
    (2014) Malaysian university students’ attitude towards six varieties of accented speech in English. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(5), 181–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alt. usage
  3. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N.
    (2002) Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ballard, L.
    (2013) Student attitudes toward accentedness of native and non-native speaking English teachers. MSU Working Papers in SLS, 4, 47–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayard, D., & Green, J. A.
    (2005) Evaluating English accents worldwide. Te Reo, 48, 21–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Best, C. T.
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp.171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2001) Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775–794. 10.1121/1.1332378
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1332378 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradley, D.
    (2004) Regional characteristics of Australian English. InE. W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortmann, R. Mesthrie and C. Upton (Eds.). A Handbook of Varieties of English (pp.645–655). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carey, M. D., Mannell, R. H., & Dunn, P. K.
    (2011) Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews?Language Testing, 28 (2), 201–219. 10.1177/0265532210393704
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210393704 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chan, J. Y. H.
    (2016) A multi-perspective investigation of attitudes towards English accents in Hong Kong: Implications for pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quaterly, 50, 285–313. doi:  10.1002/tesq.218
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.218 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2018) The choice of English pronunciation goals: different views, experiences and concerns of students, teachers and professionals. Asian Englishes, 1–21. doi:  10.1080/13488678.2018.1482436
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1482436 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, L. R. L.
    (1999) Moving beyond accent: Social and cultural realities of living with many tongues. Topics in Language Disorders, 19, 1–10. 10.1097/00011363‑199908000‑00004
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-199908000-00004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dalton-Puffer, C., Kaltenboeck, G., & Smit, U.
    (1997) Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes, 16(1): 115–128. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00052
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00052 [Google Scholar]
  14. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language teaching, 42(4), 476–490. 10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
  16. Díaz, N. R.
    (2015) Students’ preferences regarding native and non-native teachers of English at a university in the French Brittany. 32nd International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (AESLA): Language Industries and Social Change. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 93–97. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.036 [Google Scholar]
  17. Forrester, V., & Lok, B.
    (2008) Native English teachers in Hong Kong building communities of practice?Asian Social Science, 4 (5), 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Friedrich, P.
    (2000) English in Brazil: Functions and attitudes. World Englishes, 19 (2), 215–223. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00170 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M.
    (1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34: 65–87. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1984.tb00996.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00996.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Gill, M. M.
    (1994) Accent and stereotypes: Their effect on perceptions of teacher and lecture comprehension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22 (4), 348–361. 10.1080/00909889409365409
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889409365409 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F.
    (2010) The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2): 214–237. 10.1177/1088868309359288
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gurkan, S., & Yuksel, D.
    (2012) Evaluating the contributions of native and non-native teachers to an English language teaching program. WCES 2012. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46: 2951–2958. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.596
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.596 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hendriks, B., van Meurs, F., & Reimer, A. K.
    (2018) The evaluation of lecturers’ nonnative-accented English: Dutch and German students’ evaluations of different degrees of Dutch-accented and German-accented English of lecturers in higher education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 28–45. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. International Dialects of English Archive
    International Dialects of English Archive (www.dialectsarchive.com/)
  25. Jenkins, J.
    (2007) English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jeon, M.
    (2009) Globalization and native English speakers in English Programme in Korea (EPIK). Language, Culture and Curriculum, 22 (3), 231–243. doi:  10.1080/07908310903388933
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310903388933 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kachru, Braj
    (1985) Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. InQuirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G. (Eds.) English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp.11–30). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaur, P., & Raman, A.
    (2014) Exploring native speaker and non-native speaker accents: the English as a lingua franca perspective, The International Conference on Communication and Media 2014, 18–20 October, Langkawi, Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 155, 253–259. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.288
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.288 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kawanami, S., & Kawanami, K.
    (2010) Japanese learners’ perception and attitudes toward English accents. Let Kyushu-Okinawa Bulletin, (10), 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kelch, K., & Santana-Williamson, E.
    (2002) ESL students’ attitudes toward native- and nonnative-speaking instructor’s accent. The CATESOL Journal, 14(1): 57–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim, J.
    (2012) English accents and L2 learner’s identity. International Journal of English and Education, 1(2), 127–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuhl, P. K.
    (1991) Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107. 10.3758/BF03212211
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212211 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ladegaard, H. J.
    (1998) National stereotypes and language attitudes: The perception of British, American and Australian language and culture in Denmark. Language and Communication18, 251–274. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(98)00008‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00008-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2005) What do students think about the pro and cons of having a native teacher?InE. Llurda (Ed.), Non-Native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges, and contributions to the profession. (pp.217–241). Springer: New York. 10.1007/0‑387‑24565‑0_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24565-0_12 [Google Scholar]
  35. Luo, W. H.
    (2007) A study of native English-speaking teacher programs in elementary schools in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2): 311–320. 10.1007/BF03029265
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029265 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mahboob, A.
    (2004) Native or non-native: What do the students think?InL. D. Kamhi-Stein (Ed.), Learning and teaching from experience. (pp.121–147). Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. M., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C.
    (2002) Testing the effects of regional, ethnic, and international dialects of English on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55: 37–69. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00289.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00289.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Marsden, S.
    (2007) On the emergence of regional varieties of New Zealand English. New Zealand English Journal, 21: 64–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McGee, K.
    (2009) Attitudes towards accents of English at the British Council, Penang: What do the students want?Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 5: 162–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McKay, S. L., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. D.
    (2008) International English in its sociolinguistic contexts. Routledge: New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. McKenzie, R. M.
    (2008) Social factors and non-native attitudes towards varieties of spoken English: A Japanese case study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 63–88. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2008.00179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00179.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech, Language and Speech, 38, 289–306. 10.1177/002383099503800305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800305 [Google Scholar]
  43. (1999) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners, Language Learning, 49, 285–310. 10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
  44. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M. & Morton, S. L.
    (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (1), 111–131. 10.1017/S0272263106060049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pilus, Z.
    (2013) Exploring ESL learners’ attitudes towards English accents, World Applied Sciences Journal 21 (Special Issue of Studies in Language Teaching and Learning), 143–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Plakans, B. S.
    (1997) Undergraduates’ experiences with and attitudes toward international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 95–119. 10.2307/3587976
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587976 [Google Scholar]
  47. Scales, J., Wennerstrom, A., Richard, D., & Wu, S. H.
    (2006) Language learners’ perceptions of accent. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 715–738. 10.2307/40264305
    https://doi.org/10.2307/40264305 [Google Scholar]
  48. Timmis, I.
    (2002) Native-speaker norms and international English: A classroom view. ELT Journal, 56(3): 240–249. 10.1093/elt/56.3.240
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.3.240 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wahid, R., & Sulong, S.
    (2013) The gap between research and practice in the teaching of English pronunciation: Insights from teachers’ beliefs and practices. World Applied Sciences Journal21 (Special Issue of Studies in Language Teaching and Learning), 133–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Walkinshaw, I., & Duong, D. H.
    (2012) Native and non-native speaking English teachers in Vietnam: Weighing the benefits. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2014) Native and non-native teachers: Student perceptions in Vietnam and Japan. SAGE Open4(2), 1–9. 10.1177/2158244014534451
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014534451 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wan Abdul Halim, W. F. S.
    (2016) The native speaker programme in Malaysia: Boon or Bane?Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 25(1), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C.
    (2012) Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30(2), 231–252. 10.1177/0265532212456968
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456968 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, Q.
    (2009) Hong Kong people’s attitude towards varieties of English. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 151–173.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error