Volume 32, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0957-6851
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9838
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Indonesia has been facing a serious threat from fake news and hate speech which is wildly disseminated through social media. As the largest Muslim-majority country in the world, health issues and their link to religion are one of the most discussed topics on social media in this country. The aim of this study is to introduce a strategy to counterbalance fake news on vaccine issues. This research employed a mixed-method approach that used content of analysis data obtained from social media monitoring. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants from various sectors related to vaccine issues. Monitoring of six female Facebook users in anti-vaccine groups revealed that the top five topics discussed in Indonesia were certification, conspiracy, adverse effects, adjuvants, and vaccine substitution. This research recommends a communication strategy to counterbalance fake news on the vaccine, employing both medical professionals and trusted, influential members of the religious community to educate the public. They should have a strong background in medical issues and understand Islamic perspectives. The involvement of (Islamic religious leaders) is important and needed to explain that vaccines do not violate religious law.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Al Qardawi, Y.
    (2017) Islamic Studies. RetrievedJune 17, 2018, fromwww.islamicstudies.info/literature/halal-haram.htm
  2. Albright, J.
    (2017) Welcome to the Era of Fake News. Media and Communication, 5(2), 87–89.   10.17645/mac.v5i2.977
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i2.977 [Google Scholar]
  3. Antara
    Antara (2017) Health Issues_The most widely spread false information in print and online media. RetrievedJune 5, 2018, fromhttps://www.antaranews.com/berita/626813/survei-menyebutkan-hoax-terbanyak-soal-info-kesehatan
  4. Berger, J.
    (2016) Contagious: Why Things Catch On. Harvard Business Review, 244.   10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berghel, H.
    (2017) Alt-News and Post-Truths in the “Fake News” Era. Computer, 50(4), 110-114. doi:https://doi.org/0018-9162/17
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryman, A.
    (2008) Social Research Methods (Third Edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Creswell, J. W.
    (2016) Research Design. (I. T. Edition, Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J.
    (2013) Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1763–1773.   10.4161/hv.24657
    https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24657 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., MacDonald, N. E., Eskola, J., Liang, X., Chaudhuri, M., Schuster, M.
    (2015) Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. Vaccine, 33(34), 4191–4203.   10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041 [Google Scholar]
  10. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K. F. L.
    (2011) Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grabenstein, J. D.
    (2013) What the World’s religions teach, applied to vaccines and immune globulins. Vaccine, 31(16), 2011–2023.   10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.026 [Google Scholar]
  12. Grandahl, M., Paek, S. C., Grisurapong, S., Sherer, P., Tydén, T., & Lundberg, P.
    (2018) Parents’ knowledge, beliefs, and acceptance of the HPV vaccination in relation to their socio-demographics and religious beliefs: A cross-sectional study in Thailand. Plos ONE, 13 (2), 1–17.   10.1371/journal.pone.0193054
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193054 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hootsuite
    Hootsuite (2018) Digital in 2018 in Southeast Asia. We Are Social. Retrieved fromhttps://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K.
    (2018) Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302.   10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jang, S. M., Mckeever, B. W., Mckeever, R., & Kim, J. K.
    (2017) From Social Media to Mainstream News: The Information Flow of the Vaccine-Autism Controversy in the US, Canada, and the UK. Health Communication, (00), 1–8.   10.1080/10410236.2017.1384433
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1384433 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kao, H. Ko., Guo, P. Chen, & Chou, S. M.
    (2017) Taiwan’s Experience in Hospital Preparedness and Response for Emerging Infectious Diseases. Health Security, 15(2), 175–184.   10.1089/hs.2016.0105
    https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0105 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kata, A.
    (2010) A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716.   10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022 [Google Scholar]
  18. Marshall, S., Fleming, A., Moore, A. C., & Sahm, L. J.
    (2019) Views of parents regarding human papillomavirus vaccination: A systematic review and meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative literature. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(4), 331–337.   10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mastel
    Mastel (2017) National Hoaxes Surveyretrieved frommastel.id/infografis-hasil-survey-mastel-tentang-wabah-hoax-nasional.html
  20. Medved, C. E.
    (2016) Stay-at-Home Fathering as a Feminist Opportunity: Perpetuating, Resisting, and Transforming Gender Relations of Caring and Earning. Journal of Family Communication, 16(1), 16–31.   10.1080/15267431.2015.1112800
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1112800 [Google Scholar]
  21. Meng, J., McLaughlin, M., Pariera, K., & Murphy, S.
    (2016) A Comparison Between Caucasians and African Americans in Willingness to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials: The Roles of Knowledge, Distrust, Information Sources, and Religiosity. Journal of Health Communication, 21(6), 669–677.   10.1080/10810730.2016.1153760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1153760 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministry of Communication & Information Technology Indonesia – Kominfo
    Ministry of Communication & Information Technology Indonesia – Kominfo (2017) Kominfo 2017_800 ribu. RetrievedJune 5, 2017, fromhttps://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/8640/selama-2016-300-akun-medsos-penyebar-hoax-diblokir-polisi/0/sorotan_media
  23. Moran, M. B., Lucas, M., Everhart, K., Morgan, A., & Prickett, E.
    (2016) What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? A content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 9 (3), 151–163.   10.1080/17538068.2016.1235531
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2016.1235531 [Google Scholar]
  24. Paige, S. R., Krieger, J. L., & Stellefson, M. L.
    (2017) The Influence of eHealth Literacy on Perceived Trust in Online Health Communication Channels and Sources. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 53–65.   10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pelčić, G., Karačić, S., Mikirtichan, G. L., Kubar, O. I., Leavitt, F. J., Cheng-tek Tai, M., Morisitha, N., Tomašević, L.
    (2016) Religious exception for vaccination or religious excuses for avoiding vaccination. Croatian Medical Journal, 57(5), 516–521.   10.3325/cmj.2016.57.516
    https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.516 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pew Research Center
    Pew Research Center (2011) The future of the global Muslim population. Projections for 2010–2030. Population Space and Place, 13(1), 1–221.   10.1021/ic0611948
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0611948 [Google Scholar]
  27. Purnomo, M. H., Sumpeno, S., Setiawan, E. I., & Purwitasari, D.
    (2017) Biomedical Engineering Research in the Social Network Analysis Era: Stance Classification for Analysis of Hoax Medical News in Social Media. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 3–9.   10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.049
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.049 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rahman, T.
    (2018) Extreme Overvalued Beliefs: How Violent Extremist Beliefs Become “Normalized.” Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 10.   10.3390/bs8010010
    https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8010010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rappaport, S. D.
    (2010) Listening Solution: A Marketer’s guide to software & services. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(2), 197–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Republika
    Republika (2018) RetrievedJuly 18, 2018, from OKI upayakan produksi vaksin dari negara muslimhttps://www.republika.co.id/berita/gaya-hidup/info-sehat/18/07/17/pbzlpf428-oki-upayakan-produksi-vaksin-dari-negara-muslim
  31. Ruggiero, A., & Vos, M.
    (2014) Social Media Monitoring for Crisis Communication: Process, Methods and Trends in the Scientific Literature. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 4(1), 105–130. Retrieved fromwww.ojcmt.net/show_abstract.asp?numara2=415
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruijs, W. L., La Hautvast, J., Van Ijzendoorn, G., Van Ansem, W. J., Elwyn, G., Van Der Velden, K., & Hulscher, M. E.
    (2012) How healthcare professionals respond to parents with religious objections to vaccination: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1).   10.1186/1472‑6963‑12‑231
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-231 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruijs, W. L. M., Hautvast, J. L. A., Kerrar, S., Van Der Velden, K., & Hulscher, M. E. J. L.
    (2013) The role of religious leaders in promoting acceptance of vaccination within a minority group: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1.   10.1186/1471‑2458‑13‑511
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-511 [Google Scholar]
  34. Seale, C.
    (2002) Media & Health. SAGE Publications Ltd.. 10.4135/9781446216286
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216286 [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, N., & Graham, T.
    (2017) Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Information Communication and Society, 4462(December), 1–18.   10.1080/1369118X.2017.1418406
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1418406 [Google Scholar]
  36. Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., Edwards, A., & Edwards, C.
    (2016) Tweeting fast matters, but only if i think about it: Information updates on social media. Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 55–71.   10.1080/01463373.2015.1100644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1100644 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sugiyono
    Sugiyono (2017) Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (3rd ed., pp.185–187). Bandung: Alfabeta.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. The World Bank
    The World Bank (2017) Country Profile | World Development Indicators. World Development Indicators databases.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tomkins, A., Duff, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Karam, A., & Mills, E. J.
    (2015) Controversies in faith and health care. Faith-Based Health Care, 386(10005), 1776–1785.   10.1016/S0140‑6736(15)60252‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60252-5 [Google Scholar]
  40. URMC
    URMC (2018) URMC_The most 10 health issues. RetrievedJune 6, 2018, fromhttps://www.urmc.rochester.edu/senior-health/common-issues/top-ten.aspx
  41. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S.
    (2018) News online. Science, 359 (March), 1146–1151.   10.1126/science.aap9559
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 [Google Scholar]
  42. Waszak, P. M., Kasprzycka-waszak, W., & Kubanek, A.
    (2018) The spread of medical fake news in social media – the pilot quantitative study. Health Policy and Technology, 7 (2018), 115–118.   10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.03.002 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error