1887
image of Chineseness as a moving target
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Chinese are one of the earliest established immigrant communities in the Netherlands and they are part of the new ‘superdiversity’ of metropolitan societies around the world, where the relative clarity of previous migration patterns is overlaid by vastly more complex, multilayered and less stable trajectories of movement. Understanding globalization as superdiversity (i.e. as a diversification of diversity instead of a homogenization of global culture in local language and culture practices), this paper aims to disentangle the complexities of being and knowing Chinese in the Netherlands, with respect to internal diversities within Chineseness and its relation to changing Chinese language ideologies.

The empirical starting point for this contribution is an ethnographic project among young people of Chinese heritage living in the Netherlands in and around the setting of a complementary Chinese language school in the city of Eindhoven. The paper focuses on the polycentricity of Chinese, the transformations that occur in the linguistic culinary landscape and the discursive identity construction of Chinese-Dutch youth. Using a multi-site ethnographic methodology data are collected through structured observations, interviews with Chinese community members, linguistic landscaping and online ethnography.

Overall, the paper argues that an ongoing shift along with demographic, economic and political changes in China has altered migration patterns, language ideologies and linguistic landscapes in the Chinese diaspora in the Netherlands. Young people of Chinese heritage articulate a whole repertoire of inhabited and ascribed identities, and they do so by means of a complex display and deployment of the ensemble of linguistic and communicative resources at their disposal.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00062.kro
2020-10-05
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, A.
    (2007) Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackledge, A. & Creese, A.
    (2010) Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blommaert, J.
    (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2006) Language Ideology. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Second Edition (pp.510–522). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/03029‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/03029-7 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2007) Commentaries: On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(5), 628–688. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00346.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00346.x [Google Scholar]
  6. (2009) Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology50(4), 415–442. 10.1086/600131
    https://doi.org/10.1086/600131 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2010) The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Ethnography, superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783090419
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, J. & Dong
    (2010) Ethnographic Fieldwork, A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692962
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692962 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blommaert, J. & Maly, I.
    (2016) Ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis and social change; a case study. InK. Arnaut, J. Blommaert, B. Rampton & M. Spotti (Eds.), Language and Superdiversity (pp.197–217). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blommaert, J. & B. Rampton
    (2016) Language and superdiversity. InK. Arnaut, J. Blommaert, B. Rampton & M. Spotti (Eds.), Language and Superdiversity (pp.21–48). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Burawoy, M.
    (2003) Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography. American Sociological Review68, 645–679. 10.2307/1519757
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519757 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carr, E. S. & Lempert, M.
    (2016) Introduction – Pragmatics of Scale. InE. S. Carr & M. Lempert (Eds.), Scale. Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life (pp.1–21). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. CBS
    CBS (2015) Bevolking; geslacht, leeftijd, burgerlijke staat en regio. Online documents atstatline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=37325&D1=a&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=46,90&D6=0,4,9,18-19&HDR=G2,G1,G3,T&STB=G4,G5&VW=T
  15. CBS
    CBS (2018) Bevolking; generatie, geslacht, leeftijd en migratieachtergrond, 1 januari. 14 mei 2018. Online document athttps://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=37325&D1=a&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=0-4,137,152,215,232&D6=0,4,9,(l-1)-l&HDR=G2,G1,G3,T&STB=G4,G5&VW=T
  16. Chan, C. & Montt Strabucchi, M.
    (2019) Creating and negotiating “Chineseness” through Chinese restaurants in Santiago, Chile. InJ. Banh & H. Liu (Eds.), American Chinese Restaurants: Society, Culture and Consumption (pp.3–25). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429485497‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485497-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Erickson, F.
    (1997) Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. Anthropology and Education Quarterly8(3), 58–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kroskrity, P. V.
    (Ed.) (2000) Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, J.
    (2016) Chineseness as a Moving Target, Changing Infrastructures of the Chinese Diaspora in the Netherlands. Doctoral DissertationTilburg University.
  20. Pennycook, A.
    (2012) Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847697653
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697653 [Google Scholar]
  21. Pieke, F. N. & Benton, G.
    (1998) The Chinese in the Netherlands. In: G. Benton & F. N. Pieke (Eds.), The Chinese in Europe (pp.125–167). London: Martin’s Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑26096‑6_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26096-6_6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Rampton, B.
    (1998) Speech community. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 15. London: Kings College.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Silverstein, M.
    (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication23, 193–229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Vertovec, S.
    (2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies30, 1024–1054. 10.1080/01419870701599465
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2015) Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00062.kro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00062.kro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error