1887
image of Transmission of gender ideology through family discourse
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Informed by the social cognitive theory of co-orientation, this qualitative study explored the impact of family and social discourse on women’s motherhood and professional identities through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 13 Japanese women born in the decade before and after the Japanese Equal Employment Opportunity Law was established in 1986. Overall, the interviews revealed two lifestyle categories – semi-traditional and modern. Specifically, the interviews revealed that women in the semi-traditional and modern categories enacted some form of change in their gender ideology and that women in the modern category experienced more dialogue-based communication and equal power dynamic with their husbands compared to women in the semi-traditional category in which they experienced one-way communication and a greater power differential with husbands. Informed by the literature on cultural values, the findings from this study conclude that Japanese women’s empowerment is built not by resistance to oppression but by conquering the over-taxation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00077.ima
2022-07-19
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bond, M. H.
    (1996) Chinese values. InM. H. Bond (Ed.) The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp.208–226). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Byers, A. M., & Hacket, G.
    (1998) Applications of social cognitive theory to the career development of women of color. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 7, 255–267. 10.1016/S0962‑1849(98)80029‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(98)80029-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Canning, K., & Lazonick, W.
    (1994) Equal employment opportunity and the “managerial women” in Japan. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 33, 44–69. 10.1111/j.1468‑232X.1994.tb00326.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1994.tb00326.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Chinese Cultural Connection
    Chinese Cultural Connection (1987) Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164. 10.1177/0022002187018002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002187018002002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.
    (2015) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N.
    (2009) Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. 10.1146/annurev‑soc‑070308‑115920
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920 [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards, L. N.
    (1988) Equal employment opportunity in Japan: A view from the West. International and Labor Relations Review, 41, 240–250. 10.1177/001979398804100206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398804100206 [Google Scholar]
  8. Emslie, C., & Hunt, K.
    (2009) ‘Live to work’ or ‘work to live’?: A qualitative study of gender and work–life balance among men and women in mid-life. Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 151–172. 10.1111/j.1468‑0432.2008.00434.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00434.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Erickson, R. J.
    (2005) Why emotion work matters: sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 337–351. 10.1111/j.0022‑2445.2005.00120.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00120.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Eto, M.
    (2005) Women’s movements in Japan: the intersection between everyday life and politics. Japan Forum, 17, 311–333. 10.1080/09555800500283810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09555800500283810 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujita, M.
    (1989) “It’s all mother’s fault”: Childcare and the socialization of working mothers in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies, 15, 67–91. 10.2307/132408
    https://doi.org/10.2307/132408 [Google Scholar]
  12. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.
    (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heider, F.
    (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley. 10.1037/10628‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hofstede, G.
    (1980) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: The hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2. 10.9707/2307‑0919.1014
    https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang, J. S.
    (2017) Evaluating labor force participation of women in Japan and Korea: Developments and future prospects. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 23, 294–320. 10.1080/12259276.2017.1351589
    https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2017.1351589 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kazui, M.
    (1997) The influence of cultural expectations on mother-child relationships in Japan. Journal of Environmental Applied Psychology, 18, 485–496. 10.1016/S0193‑3973(97)90023‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(97)90023-X [Google Scholar]
  18. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A.
    (2006) Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. InD. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp.50–65). Sage. 10.4135/9781452204420.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420.n4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lambert, P. A.
    (2007) The political economy of postwar family policy in Japan: Economic imperatives and electoral incentives. Journal of Japanese Studies, 33, 1–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25064677. 10.1353/jjs.2007.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jjs.2007.0023 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, K. S., Tufis, P. A., & Alwin, D. F.
    (2010) Separate spheres or increasing equality?: Changing gender beliefs in postwar Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 184–201. 10.1111/j.1741‑3737.2009.00691.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00691.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Marks, G., & Houston, D. M.
    (2002) Attitudes toward work and motherhood held by working and non-working mothers. Work, employment and society, 16, 523–536. 10.1177/095001702762217470
    https://doi.org/10.1177/095001702762217470 [Google Scholar]
  22. Matsui, M.
    (1990) Evolution of the feminist movement in Japan. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 2, 435–449. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316048
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McLeod & Chafee
    (1972) Separate spheres or increasing equality?: Changing gender beliefs in postwar Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 184–201. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27752563
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
    Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2019) Shigoto to ikuji tou no ryouritsu ni kansuru jishitsu haaku no tameno chousa kenkyuu jigyou [Survey on employment and childcare]. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11900000/000534372.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mun, E., & Brinton, M. C.
    (2015) Workplace matters: The use of parental leave policy in Japan. Work and Occupations, 43, 335–369. 10.1177/0730888415574781
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415574781 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakamura, M., & Akiyoshi, M.
    (2016) Who does the dishes?: Fairness and household chores. InG. Steel (Ed.), Power in contemporary Japan (pp.79–91). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59193‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59193-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nakano, M.
    (2017) “Ikuji sedai” no jirenma [The dilemma of the “childcare leave generation”]. Kobunsha Shinsho.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Newcomb, T. M.
    (1953) An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60, 393–404. 10.1037/h0063098
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063098 [Google Scholar]
  29. OECD
    OECD (2019) Employment: Time spent in paid and unpaid work, by sex. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54757
    [Google Scholar]
  30. OECD
  31. Ogasawara, Y.
    (2019) Working women’s husbands as helpers or partners. InG. Steel (Ed.) Beyond the gender gap in Japan (pp.83–102). University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R.
    (2003) Data management and analysis methods. InN. K. Densin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (2nd Ed). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sasaki, M.
    (2002) The causal effect of family structure on labor force participation among Japanese married women. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 429–440. 10.2307/3069654
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3069654 [Google Scholar]
  34. Shimada, H., & Higuchi, Y.
    (1985) An analysis of trends in female labor force participation in Japan. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 355–374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2535011. 10.1086/298089
    https://doi.org/10.1086/298089 [Google Scholar]
  35. Statistics Bureau of Japan
    Statistics Bureau of Japan (2020) Statistical handbook of Japan 2020. https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/pdf/2020all.pdf#page=139
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Steinberg, S., Kruckman, L., & Steinberg, S.
    (2000) Reinventing fatherhood in Japan and Canada. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1257–1272. 10.1016/S0277‑9536(99)00368‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00368-8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Strauss, A. L.
    (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tachibanaki, T.
    (2010) The new paradox for Japanese women: Greater choice, greater inequality. International House.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012) International comparisons of annual labor force statistics, 1970–2012. https://www.bls.gov/fls/flscomparelf.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Watanabe, N.
    (1995) Shufu kara zennichisei shimin e, soshite seikatsusha toshiteno josei e [From housewives to full citizens and vibrant women]. InY. Sato, M. Amano, & H. Nasu (Eds.), Joseitachi no seikatsusha und ̄o: seikatsu kurabu o sasaeru hitobito [The women’s movement for everyday life] (pp.175–221). Maruj ̄usha.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yun, S. H.
    (2012) An analysis of Confucianism’s yin-yang harmony with nature and the traditional oppression of women: Implications for social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 13, 582–598. 10.1177/1468017312436445
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017312436445 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, Y. B., Lin, M-C., Nonaka, A., & Beon, K.
    (2006) Harmony, hierarchy and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian Values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication Research Reports, 22, 107–115. 10.1080/00036810500130539
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00036810500130539 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00077.ima
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00077.ima
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Japanese motherhood ; family communication ; gender ideology ; working woman identity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error