1887
image of Negotiating the language of gender and sexuality
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This case study focuses on the educational materials created by an NGO drop-in centre for the queer/questioning community in a Cambodian city. These materials consist of bilingual posters (English and Khmer) on display at the centre which provide explanations to those who make use of this space about diverse gender/sexual identities (LGBTQ+), as well as online resources featured on the NGO’s website/social media that raise awareness of these issues at both local and global levels. The study seeks to gain critical insight into the use of certain linguistic resources for sexuality education at this site of instruction. To do so, we present a multimodal discourse analysis of a sample of the materials, together with an analysis of metapragmatic reflections drawn from interviews conducted with the centre’s director. We therefore attend to how multilingual linguistic resources, and other semiotic forms, are being used to foster and shape knowledges about gender and sexualities at this site of community engagement, and how a metapragmatic negotiation of these knowledges in the interview reveals identity work that impacts these linguistic choices and their potential effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00095.row
2022-10-28
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altman, D.
    (1997) Global gaze/global gays. GLQ: A journal of lesbian and gay studies, 3, 417–36. 10.1215/10642684‑3‑4‑417
    https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-3-4-417 [Google Scholar]
  2. Binnie, J.
    (2004) The Globalization of Sexuality. Sage. 10.4135/9781446218341
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218341 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boellstorff, T.
    (2004) Gay language and Indonesia: Registering belonging. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 248–268. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.248
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.248 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2010) Queer Techne: Two theses on methodology and queer studies. InC. Nash and K. Browne (Eds) Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research (pp.215–230). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
    (2004) Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society, 33(04), 469–515. 10.1017/S0047404504334020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504334020 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cambodian Centre for Human Rights
    Cambodian Centre for Human Rights (2016) Discrimination against transgender women in Cambodia’s urban centers. Retrieved fromhttps://cchrcambodia.org/index_old.php?url=project_page/project_page.php&p=report_detail.php&reid=115&id=3
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cambodian Centre for Human Rights
    Cambodian Centre for Human Rights (2012) Rainbow Khmer: From prejudice to pride. Retrieved fromhttps://cchrcambodia.org/index_old.php?url=project_page/project_page.php&p=report_detail.php&reid=85&id=3
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cambodian Centre for Human Rights
    Cambodian Centre for Human Rights (2010) Coming out in the kingdom: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in Cambodia. Retrieved fromhttps://cchrcambodia.org/index_old.php?url=project_page/project_page.php&p=report_detail.php&reid=8&id=3
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, D., & Kulick, D.
    (2003) Language and sexuality. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chou, W. S.
    (2001) Homosexuality and the cultural politics of tongzhi in Chinese societies. InG. Sullivan & P. Jackson (Eds.) Gay and lesbian Asia: Culture, identity, community (pp.27–46). Haworth Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Brun, P.
    (2019) Queering Kampuchea: LGBT Rights Discourse and Postcolonial Queer Subject-Formation in Cambodian Queer Politics. Unpublished Masters Thesis, SOAS, University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Duff, P. A.
    (2021) Case study. InC. A. Chapelle (Ed.) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–7). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0121.pub2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0121.pub2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R.
    (2016) Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42–59. 10.1080/1051144X.2016.1205832
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2016.1205832 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eckert, P.
    (2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2004) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaffe, A.
    (ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jaworski, A., Coupland, N., & Galasiński, D.
    (2004) Metalanguage: Why now?InA. Jaworski, N. Coupland & D. Galasiński (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp.3–8). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907377.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377.3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jewitt, C.
    (1999) A social semiotic analysis of male heterosexuality in sexual health resources: The case of images. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 1(4), 263–280. 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846880
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846880 [Google Scholar]
  20. King, B. W.
    (2008) “Being gay guy, that is the advantage”: queer Korean language learning and identity construction. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7(3–4), 230–252. 10.1080/15348450802237855
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450802237855 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T.
    (2021) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge (3rd edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Leap, W. L., & Boellstorff, T.
    (eds.) (2004) Speaking in queer tongues: Globalisation and gay language. University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lefevre, A.
    (1992) Translation, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Masiello, F.
    (2004) Joyce in Buenos Aires (Talking sexuality through translation). Diacritics, 34(3), 55–72. 10.1353/dia.2006.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2006.0041 [Google Scholar]
  25. Motschenbacher, H.
    (2021) Foreign Language Learning and Sexuality-Related Inclusion: A Multimodal Analysis of Representational Practices in the German Textbook Series Navi Englisch. InL. Pakula (Ed.). Linguistic perspectives on sexuality in education: Representations, constructions and negotiations (pp.51–75). Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑64030‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64030-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  26. Motschenbacher, H., & Stegu, M.
    (2013) Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society, 24(5), 519–535. 10.1177/0957926513486069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nelson, C. D.
    (2010) A gay immigrant student’s perspective: Unspeakable acts in the language class. TESOL Quarterly, 44(3), 441–464. 10.5054/tq.2010.226853
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.226853 [Google Scholar]
  28. Overstreet, M.
    (2015) Metapragmatics. InC. A. Chapelle (Ed.) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–7). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1470
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1470 [Google Scholar]
  29. Paiz, J. M.
    (2015) Over the monochrome rainbow: Heteronormativity in ESL reading texts and textbooks. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 4(1), 77–101. 10.1075/jls.4.1.03pai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.1.03pai [Google Scholar]
  30. Pakuła, Ł., Pawelczyk, J., & Sunderland, J.
    (2015) Gender and sexuality in English language education: Focus on Poland. British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pennycook, A.
    (2000) English, politics, ideology: From colonial celebration to post-colonial performativity. InT. Ricento (ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp.107–119). John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.6.09pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.6.09pen [Google Scholar]
  32. Pérez-Milans, Miguel
    (2016) Reflexivity and social change in applied linguistics. AILA Review29, 1–14. 10.1075/aila.29.01per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.01per [Google Scholar]
  33. Phillipson, R.
    (2006) Language policy and linguistic imperialism, inT. Ricento (ed.) An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp.346–361). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rainbow Community Kampuchea RoCK
    Rainbow Community Kampuchea RoCK (2019) “I married a man to satisfy my parents”: Family violence towards lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people in Cambodia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.rockcambodia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Family-Violence-LBT_ENG-19.06.2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rowsell, J., & Collier, D. R.
    (2017) Researching multimodality in language and education. InK. A. King, Y. Lai, & S. May (eds.), Research methods in language and education (3rd edition), (pp.311–324). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02249‑9_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02249-9_23 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rowlett, B. J. L.
    (2019) ‘The lines are blurred’: Same-sex relationships and the local practice of sponsorship in Cambodia. Gender and Language13(1), 23–47. 10.1558/genl.32942
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.32942 [Google Scholar]
  37. Santaemilia, J.
    (2018) Sexuality and translation as intimate partners? Toward a queer turn in rewriting identities and desires. InB. J. Baer & K. Kaindl (eds.), Queering translation, translating the queer (pp.11–25). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sauntson, H.
    (2018) Language, sexuality and education. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316411353
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316411353 [Google Scholar]
  39. Siegel, M., & Panofsky, C. P.
    (2009) Designs for multimodality in literacy studies: Explorations in analysis. InK. M. Leander (Ed.), 58th yearbook of the national reading conference (pp.99–111). Oak Creek: National Reading Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sullivan, G. & Jackson, P.
    (eds.) (2001) Gay and lesbian Asia: Culture, identity, community. Haworth Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. UNDP, USAID
    UNDP, USAID (2014) Being LGBT in Asia: Cambodia country report. Retrieved fromhttps://www.usaid.gov/documents/1861/being-lgbt-asia-cambodia-country-report
    [Google Scholar]
  42. van Leeuwen, T.
    (2018) Multimodality. InD. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.) The handbook of discourse analysis (pp.447–465). Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wong, D.
    (2011) Hybridization and the emergence of “gay” identities in Hong Kong and in China. Visual Anthropology, 24(1–2), 152–170. 10.1080/08949468.2011.527810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2011.527810 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00095.row
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00095.row
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error