1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0957-6851
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9838
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00097.int
2023-03-30
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arima, A. N.
    (2003) Gender stereotypes in Japanese television advertisements. Sex Roles, 49(1/2), 81–90. 10.1023/A:1023965704387
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023965704387 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burnett, A.
    (2017) Gender and communication. InM. Allen (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 612–615). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781483381411.n217
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n217 [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlebois, J.
    (2013) Herbivore masculinity as an oppositional form of masculinity. Culture, Society and Masculinities, 5(1), 89–104. 10.3149/CSM.0501.89
    https://doi.org/10.3149/CSM.0501.89 [Google Scholar]
  4. D’Ambrogio, E.
    (2020, December). Japan’s aging society. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/659419/EPRS_2020)659419_EN.pdf
  5. Deaux, K., & Major, B.
    (1987) Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender- related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389. 10.1037/0033‑295X.94.3.369
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369 [Google Scholar]
  6. Erickson-Schroth, L.
    (2014) Trans bodies, trans selves: A resource for the transgender community. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fixmer-Oraiz, N. & Wood, J. T.
    (2017) Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (13th ed). Boston, MA: Cengage.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Foss, S. K. & Foss, K. A.
    (2009) Our journey to repowered feminism: Expanding feminist toolbox. Women’s Studies in Communication, 32,(1), 36–61. 10.1080/07491409.2009.10162380
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2009.10162380 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A.
    (1997) Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 211, 173–206. 10.1111/j.1471‑6402.1997.tb00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedan, B.
    (1963) The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall, W. J.
    (2019) Sexual orientation. InFranklin, C. (ed). Encyclopedia of social work. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.1271
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.1271 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hancock, A. B. & Rubin, B. A.
    (2015) Influence of communication partner’s gender on language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 46–64. 10.1177/0261927X14533197
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14533197 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hekman, S.
    (1997) Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 22(2), 341–365. 10.1086/495159
    https://doi.org/10.1086/495159 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hofstede, G.
    (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kajimoto, T.
    (2021, June17). Japan Inc to fall short of goal for more female managers: Reuters poll. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-companies-womenomics-idCAKCN2DT2V4
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, A., & Pawelczyk, J.
    (2014) Language and gender research in Poland. InS. Ehrlich, S. Meyerhoff, M. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff & J. Holmes (Eds). The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality (2nd ed) (pp. 355–377). Chichester, UK; Willey-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584248.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L.
    (2008) Gender stereotypes. Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Leap, W. L.
    (1996) Word’s Out: Gay men’s English. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Murata, Y.
    (2011) Kyaria patan no jizoku to henyou-“Shin jinrui” sedai ikou no jirei kara [The continuance and change of career patterns: Case-studies from the “new breed” generation]. InF. Taga (Ed.), Yuragu sarariiman seikatsu (pp. 65–98). Tokyo, Japan: Minervashobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MacKinnon, C. A.
    (2007) Women’ lives, men’s laws. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2020) Global #MeToo. InChandra, G. & Erlingsdóttir, I. (Eds). Routledge handbook of the politics of the #MeToo movement (pp. 42–64). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367809263‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809263-5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakamura, M.
    (2014) Historical discourse approach to Japanese women’s language. InS. Ehrlich, S. Meyerhoff, M. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff & J. Holmes (Eds). The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed) (pp. 378–395). Chichester, UK; Willey-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584248.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nemoto, K., Fuwa, M., & Ishiguro, K.
    (2012) Never-married men’s gender beliefs and ambivalence toward matrimony in Japan. Journal of Family Issues, 34(12), 1673–1695. 10.1177/0192513X12462573
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12462573 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ohbuchi, K.
    (2015) Shippai shinai ayamari kata [How to not fail at apologizing]. Tokyo: CCC Media House.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Okamoto, S. A.
    (1995) “Tasteless” Japanese: Less “feminine” speech among young Japanese women. InK. Hall & M. Bucholtz (eds.) Gender articulated: Language and socially constructed self. (pp.297–328). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rich, M.
    (2021, Feb11). Tokyo Olympics chief resigns over sexist comments. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/world/asia/yoshiro-mori-tokyo-olympics-resigns.html
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K.
    (1986) Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language & Communication, 6(1-2), 1–24. 10.1016/0271‑5309(86)90002‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(86)90002-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Scott, J. W.
    (1999) Gender and politics of history. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sreetharan, C. S.
    (2004) Students, sarariiman (pl.), and seniors: Japanese men’s use of manly′ speech register. Language and Society, 331,81–107. 10.1017/S0047404504031045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504031045 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C.
    (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. InS. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall. 10.4324/9780203505984‑16
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16 [Google Scholar]
  31. von Hippel, C., Wiryakusuma, C., Bowden, J., & Shochet, M.
    (2011) Stereotype threat and female communication styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1312–1324. 10.1177/0146167211410439
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211410439 [Google Scholar]
  32. Uchida, A.
    (1992) When “difference” is “dominance”: A critique of the “anti-power-based” cultural approach to sex differences. Language in Society211, 547–568. 10.1017/S0047404500015724
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015724 [Google Scholar]
  33. West, C., & Zimmerman, D.
    (1987) Doing gender. Gender & Society, 11, 125–151. 10.1177/0891243287001002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wingfield, A.
    (2009) Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23(1), 5–26. 10.1177/0891243208323054
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208323054 [Google Scholar]
  35. World Economic Forum
    World Economic Forum (2020) Global gender gap report 2020. www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zalis, S.
    (2021, May17). The future for working moms: What a year of pandemic life taught us. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/shelleyzalis/2021/05/17/the-future-for-working-moms-what-a-year-of-pandemic-life-taught-us/?sh=5568bd272300
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C.
    (1975) Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation. InB. Thome & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–126). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00097.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error