1887
Volume 33, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0957-6851
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9838
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study examined how LGBTQ individuals negotiate their identities in the Malaysian heteronormative society using the Discourse-Historical Approach. In-depth interviews were carried out with 13 LGBTQ individuals to find out the discursive strategies they used in describing the triggers for coming out, their experiences, and the reasons for their struggles. The analysis of the interview data showed that the participants used the “destiny” and “rights” arguments to counter the “legal”, “religious” and “traditional values” arguments used by heterosexuals to reject them. Referents and personal pronouns were selectively used by LGBTQ participants to present different perspectives, “us” versus “them” (heterosexuals), “I” and other LGBTQ individuals, and “I” versus “they” or “you” (other sexual orientations). The findings have implications that are relevant to mitigation of LGBTQ identities in contexts which have strong heteronormative norms due to legal, religion and traditional values.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00103.tin
2023-07-25
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asian-Pacific Resources & Research Centre for Women (ARROW)
    Asian-Pacific Resources & Research Centre for Women (ARROW) (2020) Monitoring Report: LGBTIQ+ Rights in Malaysia. https://arrow.org.my/wpcontent/uploads/2021/01/LGBTIQ-Rights-in-Malaysia-.pdf
  2. Asyraf Zulkffli, M., & Rashid, R. A.
    (2019) Discursive strategies employed by homosexual Malaysian Muslim men in talking about homosexuality in Islam. Discourse & Society, 30(3), 307–320. 10.1177/09579265198280
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265198280 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheah, W. H., & Singaravelu, H.
    (2017) The coming-out process of gay and lesbian individuals from Islamic Malaysia: Communication strategies and motivation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(5), 401–423. 10.1080/17475759.2017.1362460
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2017.1362460 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chodron, V. T.
    (2008) Dealing with life’s issues: A Buddhist perspective. Kong Meng San Phor Kark See Monastery.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman, J. W.
    (2002) The new Buddhism: The Western transformation of an ancient tradition. Oxford University Press. 10.1080/13676261.2014.992306
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.992306 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Ridder, S., & Van Bauwel, S.
    (2015) The discursive construction of gay teenagers in times of mediatization: youth’s reflections on intimate storytelling, queer shame and realness in popular social media places. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(6), 777–793. 10.1080/13676261.2014.992306
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.992306 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I.
    (2015) Textual analysis. InM. Bevir & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpretive political science (pp.186–198). London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Felix, M. S.
    (2016) Gay identity construction of ten Muslim male undergrduates in Penang, Malaysia: A phenomenological qualitative study. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 16(2), 1–1.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Foong, A. L., Liow, J. W., Nalliah, S., Low, W. Y., Samy, A. L., & Khalaf, Z. F.
    (2020) Attitudes of future doctors towards LGBT patients in conservative Malaysian society. Sexuality & Culture, 241, 1358–1375.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goh, J. N.
    (2020) Becoming a Malaysian trans man: Gender, society, body and faith. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑4534‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4534-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goh, J. N., & Kananatu, T.
    (2019) Mak nyahs and the dismantling of dehumanisation: Framing empowerment strategies of Malaysian male-to-female transsexuals in the 2000s. Sexualities, 22(1–2), 114–130. 10.1177/1363460717740256
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717740256 [Google Scholar]
  12. Jerome, C.
    (2013) The complexity of Malay Muslim identity in Dina Zaman’s “I am Muslim”. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 13(2), 169–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2019) The right to be me, queerly, cyberly: Cybercrime and queer individuals in Malaysia. InY. H. Khoo & D. Simandjuntak (Eds.), Exploring the nexus between technologies and human rights: Opportunities and challenges in Southeast Asia (pp.150–184). Bangkok, Thailand: SHAPE-SEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2020) A place I could call my own: Queer Malays and the meanings of ‘home’. Indonesia and the Malay World, 48(141), 247–260. 10.1080/13639811.2020.1751948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2020.1751948 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jerome, C., Ting, S. H., Yeo, J. Y., & Ling, H. N.
    (2021) Examining discrepant views of LGBT and non-LGBT individuals on societal receptivity towards the LGBT phenomenon in present-day Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science Research, 3(1), 55–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jerome, C., Ting, S. H., & Yeo, J. Y.
    (2021) Examining the human dignity factor and the public’s attitudes towards LGBT in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 3(2), 12–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mokhtar, M. F., Wan Sukeri, W. A. E. D., & Abd Latiff, Z.
    (2019) Social media roles in spreading LGBT movement in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 3(2), 77–82. 10.20885/asjmc.vol3.iss2.art4
    https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol3.iss2.art4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nartey, M.
    (2022) Marginality and otherness: The discursive construction of LGBT issues/people in the Ghanaian news media. Media, Culture & Society44(4), 785–801. 10.1177/01634437211045552
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211045552 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pak, V.
    (2023) Lighting, signing, showing: The circulability of Pink Dot’s counterpublic discourse in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 27(1), 24–41. 10.1111/josl.12568
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12568 [Google Scholar]
  20. Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia (PROHAM)
    Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia (PROHAM) (2020, August5). Letter: LGBTQ-related government policies -stop intimidation of human rights defenders. Malaysiakini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/537446
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ramlan, Y.
    (2019, November21). PM slams West for erosion of values, same-sex marriage. MalaysiaKini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/500763
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
    (2017) The discourse-historical approach. InJ. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp.87–121). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-4 [Google Scholar]
  23. Reuters
    Reuters (2022, October31). Malaysia questions 18 people arrested at LGBT Halloween party. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/malaysia-questions-18-people-arrested-lgbt-halloween-party-2022-10-31/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Saviniemi, J. M.
    (2019) Diversity without legitimacy: Gender, discourse, and recognition of transwomen in Malaysia. [Masters Thesis, University of Helsinki Faculty of Social Sciences Social and Cultural Anthropology].
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shamsudin, Z., & Ghazali, K.
    (2011) A discursive construction of homosexual males in a Muslim-dominant community. Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 30(3–4), 279–304. 10.1515/mult.2011.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2011.013 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sheldon, J. P., Pfeffer, C. A., Jayaratne, T. E., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M.
    (2007) Beliefs about the etiology of homosexuality and about the ramifications of discovering its possible genetic origin. Journal of Homosexuality, 521, 111–150. 10.1300/J082v52n03_06
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v52n03_06 [Google Scholar]
  27. Singaravelu, H., & Cheah, W. H.
    (2020) Being gay and lesbian in Malaysia. InN. Nakamura & C. H. Logie (Eds.), LGBTQ mental health: International perspectives and experience (pp.121–135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/0000159‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000159-000 [Google Scholar]
  28. Slamah, K.
    (2005) The struggle to be ourselves, neither men nor women: Mak Nyahs in Malaysia.” InG. Misra & R. Chandiramani (Eds.), Sexuality, gender, and rights: Exploring theory and practice in South and Southeast Asia (pp.98–112). London, UK: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smietana, M., Thompson, C., & Twine, F. W.
    (2018) Making and breaking families: Reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online71: 112–130. 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Subir, S. Z.
    (2019) Analysing news coverage on homosexuality in Malay language newspapers in Malaysia, 1998–2012. Jurnal Komunkasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 83–100. 10.17576/JKMJC‑2019‑3504‑06
    https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3504-06 [Google Scholar]
  31. Summers, C. J.
    (2005) The Queer Encyclopedia of film & television. The United States: Cleis Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
    Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) (2019) Study on discrimination against transgender persons based in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor: Right to education, employment, healthcare, housing and dignity. Kuala Lumpur: SUHAKAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tan, K. K. H.
    (2022) It’s time to consider LGBTQ-affirmative psychology in Malaysia. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 4(1), 43–48. 10.1177/26318318211060484
    https://doi.org/10.1177/26318318211060484 [Google Scholar]
  34. The Trevor Project
    The Trevor Project (2020, July29). Pronouns usages among LGBTQ youth. www.the.trevorproject.org/research-briefs/pronouns-usage-among-lgbtq-youth
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Teh, Y. K.
    (1998) Understanding the problems of mak nyahs (male transsexuals) in Malaysia. South East Asia Research, 6(2), 165–180. 10.1177/0967828X9800600204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X9800600204 [Google Scholar]
  36. United Nations. UN widens its same-sex marriage policy to include all legally-married staff
    United Nations. UN widens its same-sex marriage policy to include all legally-married staff 2014, July8. https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/07/472572-un-widens-its-same-sex-marriage-policy-include-all-legally-married-staff
  37. United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner
    United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner. LGBT Rights. Non-dated. https://cambodia.ohchr.org/en/issues/lgbt-rights-0
  38. United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner
    United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner. (n.d.). About LGBTI people and human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/about-lgbti-people-and-human-rights
  39. Wong, D. J.
    (2022) Malaysia’s JAKIM creates app to help gay people become straight. https://sea.mashable.com/life/19646/malaysias-jakim-creates-app-to-help-gay-people-become-straight (accessed2 September 2022).
  40. Yeo, J. J. Y., Ting, S. H., & Jerome, C.
    (2021, May29). Religion and attitudes towards LGBT in Malaysia. Proceedings of 2nd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Business, Education, Social Sciences and Technology 2021 (KLIBEST 2021), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yulius, H., Tang, S., & Offord, B.
    (2018) The globalization of LGBT identity and same-sex marriage as a catalyst of neo-institutional values: Singapore and Indonesia in focus. InB. Winter, M. Forest, & R. Sénac (Eds.), Global perspectives on same-sex marriage: A neo-institutional approach (pp.171–196). London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑62764‑9_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zainon, S., Mohd Faizal, S. Z., & Shahirah, S.
    (2018) The discursive strategies used by young homosexual males in the construction of their identity. InA. M. Lokman, T. Yamanaka, P. Lévy, K. Chen & S. Koyama (eds.), 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research (pp.712–720). Singapore: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑8612‑0_74
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_74 [Google Scholar]
  43. Zulkffli, A. M., & Ab Rashid, R.
    (2019) Discursive strategies employed by homosexual Malaysian Muslim men in talking about homosexuality in Islam. Discourse & Society, 30(3), 307–320. 10.1177/0957926519828032
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519828032 [Google Scholar]
  44. Zotzmann, K., & O’Regan, J. P.
    (2016) Critical discourse analysis and identity. InS. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp.113–128). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00103.tin
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/japc.00103.tin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discursive construction; heteronormative; LGBTQ; Malaysia; mitigation; self-representation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error