Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0957-6851
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9838
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The relationship between Japan and South Korea has been particularly tumultuous in recent years. One of the major sources of unrest is the unresolved Dokdo (. Takeshima) issue. This study examines the framing of the issue by four international news agencies. It explores whether international news agencies from different countries would frame the issue differently. Results suggest that the news agencies frame the issue differently depending on the agencies’ country of origin.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Akhavan-Majid, R. , & Ramaprasad, J.
    (1998) Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Women and the NGO forum. Mass Communication & Society, 1(2/3), 131–152. doi: 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677853
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677853 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2000) Framing Beijing: Dominant ideological influences on the American press coverage of the Fourth UN conference on Women and the NGO forum. Gazette, the International Journal for Communication Studies, 62(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1177/0016549200062001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549200062001004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardhan, N.
    (2001) Transnational AIDS-HIV news narratives: A critical exploration of overarching frames. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 283–309. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_03 [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker, S.
    (1984) Marxist approaches to media studies: The British experience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(1), 66–80. doi: 10.1080/15295038409360014
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360014 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brewer, P. R.
    (2006) National interest frames and public opinion about world affairs. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(4), 89–102. doi: 10.1177/1081180X06293725
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06293725 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridges, B.
    (1993) Japan and Korea in the 1990s: From antagonism to adjustment, Aldershot, England: Bookfield, Vermont, Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Camaj, L.
    (2010) Media framing through stages of a political discourse: International news agencies’ coverage of Kosovo’s status negotiations. International Communication Gazette, 72(7), 635–653. doi: 10.1177/1748048510378147
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510378147 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, K. & Lee, T.
    (2010) International news determinants in the US media. In G. Golan , T. Johnson and W. Wanta (Eds.), International Media Communication in a Global Age (pp.71–88). Florence, USA: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, T. & Lin, F.
    (2014) From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China’s international practice and its image, 1950–2009. Public Relations Review, 40, 450–458. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  10. Choi, S.
    (2005) The politics of the Dokdo issue. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5, 465–494. doi: 10.1017/S1598240800002071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800002071 [Google Scholar]
  11. Edelman, M.
    (1993) Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10(3), 231–242. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962981
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962981 [Google Scholar]
  12. Entman, R. M.
    (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1991.tb02328.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x [Google Scholar]
  13. (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  14. (2008) Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102. doi: 10.1177/1940161208314657
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657 [Google Scholar]
  15. Furukawa, K.
    (2011) Bordering Japan: Towards a comprehensive perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 26(3), 297–314. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2011.686968
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2011.686968 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gamson, W. A.
    (1989) News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157–161. doi: 10.1177/0002764289033002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033002006 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2003) Bystanders, public opinion, and the media. In D. A. Snow , S. A. Soule and H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp.242–261). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gamson, W. A. , & Lasch, K. E.
    (1983) The political culture of social welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro and E. Yuchman-Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives (pp.397–415). NY: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑657980‑2.50032‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-657980-2.50032-2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gamson, W. A. , & Modigliani, A.
    (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. Political Sociology, 3, 137–177
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1086/229213
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229213 [Google Scholar]
  21. Giffard, C. A. , & Leuven, N. V.
    (2008) Five views on development: How news agencies cover the UN millennium development goals. Journal of Global Mass Communication, 1(1/2), 22–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Goffman, E.
    (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gunaratne, S. A. , & Kim, S.
    (2000) North Korea. In S. A. Gunaratne (Eds.), Handbook of the Media in Asia (pp.586–610). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall, S.
    (1977) Culture, the media, and the ideological effects. In J. Curran , M. Gurevitch and J. Wollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp.315–48). Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Han, G.
    (2007) Mainland China frames Taiwan: How China’s news websites covered Taiwan’s 2004 presidential election. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(1), 40–57. doi: 10.1080/01292980601114547
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980601114547 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hara, K.
    (2006) Cold War frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided territories in the San Francisco System. Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hawdon, J. , Agnich, L. E. , & Ryan, J.
    (2014) Media framing of a tragedy: A content analysis of print media coverage of the Virginia Tech tragedy. Traumatology, 20(3), 199–208. doi: 10.1037/h0099400
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099400 [Google Scholar]
  28. Herman, E. , & Chomsky, N.
    (1988) Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Holt, L. F. , & Major, L. H.
    (2010) Frame and blame: An analysis of how national and local newspapers framed the Jena 6 controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3/4), 582–597. doi: 10.1177/107769901008700309
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700309 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hong, J.
    (2011) From the world’s largest propaganda machine to a multi-functional news service: The transformation of Xinhua News Service since 1978. Journal of Political Communication, 28(3), 377–393. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.572487
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.572487 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hyun, D.
    (Ed.) (2008) The historical perceptions of Korea and Japan: Its origins and points of the issues concerning Dokdo/Takeshima, Yasukuni Shrine, Comfort Women, and Textbooks. Seoul: Nanam.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Iyengar, S.
    (1991) Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issue. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1992) Framing responsibility for political issue: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00992330
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992330 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jang, W.
    (2013) News as propaganda: A comparative analysis of US and Korean press coverage of the Six-Party Talks, 2003–2007. International Communication Gazette, 75(2), 188–204. doi: 10.1177/1748048512465555
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512465555 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jang, W. , Hong, J. , & Frederick, E.
    (2015) The framing of the North Korean Six-Party Talks by Chinese and North Korean news agencies: Communist propaganda and national interests. Media International Australia, 154, 42–52. doi: 10.1177/1329878X1515400107
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1515400107 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jowett, G. S. , & O’Donnell, V.
    (1992) Propaganda and Persuasion. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, C. , & Yang, J.
    (1996) Foreign news and national interest: Comparing U.S. and Japanese coverage of a Chinese student movement. International Communication Gazette, 56(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1177/001654929605600101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001654929605600101 [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, X. , & Liu, X.
    (2010) Framing and coverage of the same-sex marriage in U.S. newspapers. The Howard Journal of Communication, 21, 72–91. doi: 10.1080/10646170903501161
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170903501161 [Google Scholar]
  39. Massey, B. L.
    (2000) How three Southeast-Asian newspapers framed ‘the Haze’ of 1997–98. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(1): 72–94. doi: 10.1080/01292980009364776
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980009364776 [Google Scholar]
  40. McGinty, E. E. , Webster, D. W. , Jarlenski, M. , & Barry, C. L.
    (2014) News media framing of serious mental illness and gun violence in the United States, 1997–2012. American Journal of Public Health, 104(3), 406–413. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301557
    https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301557 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mohr, J. W.
    (1998) Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 345–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345 [Google Scholar]
  42. Murphy, P.
    (2001) Affiliation bias and expert disagreement in framing the nicotine addition debate. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(3), 278–299. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600302 [Google Scholar]
  43. Nohrstedt, S. A. , Kaitatzi-Whitlock, S. , Ottosen, R. , & Riegert, K.
    (2000) From the Persian Gulf to Kosovo: War journalism and propaganda. European Journal of Communication, 15(3), 383–404. doi: 10.1177/0267323100015003007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323100015003007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ostini, J. , & Fung, A. H.
    (2002) Beyond the four theories of the press: A new model of national media systems. Mass Communication & Society, 5(1), 41–56. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0501_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0501_4 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pan, Z. , & Kosicki, G. M.
    (1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 [Google Scholar]
  46. Popping, R.
    (2000) Computer-assisted text analysis. London: Sage Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781849208741
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208741 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rantanen, T.
    (1995) News agencies in Post-Communist Russia: From state monopoly to state dominance. European Journal of Communication, 10(2), 207–220. doi: 10.1177/0267323195010002003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323195010002003 [Google Scholar]
  48. Shoemaker, P. J. , Eichholz, M. , Kim, E. , & Wrigley, B.
    (2001) Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233–246. doi: 10.1177/107769900107800202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800202 [Google Scholar]
  49. Simmons, G.
    (2014) Russian public diplomacy in the 21st Century: Structure, means and message. Public Relations Review, 40, 440–449. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Semetko, H. A. , & Valkenburg, P. M.
    (2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2000.tb02843.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Snow, N. , & Taylor, P. M.
    (2006) The revival of the propaganda state: US propaganda at home and abroad since 9/11. The International Communication Gazette, 68(5–6), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/1748048506068718
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048506068718 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tuchman, G.
    (1978) Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Verschueren, J.
    (1985) International news reporting: Metapragmatic metaphors and the U-2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pb.vi.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vi.5 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, M.
    (1991) Who is dominating whose ideology? New York Times reporting on China. Asian Journal of Communication, 2(1), 51–69. doi: 10.1080/01292989109359540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292989109359540 [Google Scholar]
  55. Woelfel, J.
    (1998) Catpac user’s manual (Catpac II, Version 2.0). New York: Rah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Yoon, Y. , & Yi, G.
    (2002) Media management of international conflict: A comparative analysis of news coverage of Dokdo Island. Korea Journal, 42(4), 264–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Youm, K.
    (1991) Press laws in North Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 2(1), 70–86. doi: 10.1080/01292989109359541
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292989109359541 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dokdo; news agencies; news framing; propaganda; Takeshima; territorial disputes
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error