1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2666-8882
  • E-ISSN: 2666-8890
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated to what extent the complexity of EMI university reading materials matches EMI students’ reading proficiency. Text complexity and student proficiency were compared utilizing the Lexile® Framework for Reading text measures, reading test results, student questionnaire responses, and interviews with EMI lecturers. The results of the study indicate that, on average, Lexile text measures of EMI reading materials match students’ Lexile reading scores well. However, the analyses also show that there are wide disparities between texts in terms of difficulty and students in terms of proficiency. The questionnaire and interview data show that factors such as students’ topical knowledge, text length, and text structure and organization are relevant aspects of perceived text complexity beyond word frequency and sentence length. In terms of assessment practices in EMI contexts, the findings of the study suggest that (1) EMI language admission tests should consider reading ability separately; (2) integrated reading/speaking and reading/writing tasks should be authentic; (3) language tests for admission in EMI settings should also consider text length; and (4) texts in language tests for admission should vary in terms of Lexile scores to reflect real-world EMI contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.21006.hol
2022-08-25
2023-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. C.
    (2000) Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511732935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldridge, D.
    (2019) Reading, engagement and higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 38–50. 10.1080/07294360.2018.1534804
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1534804 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
    (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. British Council
    British Council (2020) Aptis. https://www.britishcouncil.ge/en/exam/aptis/what
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman, J. A.
    (2006) English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14. 10.1017/S026144480600320X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X [Google Scholar]
  6. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2018) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crossley, S. A., Allen, D. A., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2011) Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 84–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2008) Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 475–493. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00142.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00142.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M., McCarthy, P., & McNamara, D.
    (2007) A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 15–30. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00507.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Kyle, K.
    (2017) Predicting text comprehension, processing, and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 340–359. 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1296264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1296264 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dearden, J.
    (2014) English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.es/sites/default/files/british_council_english_as_a_medium_of_instruction.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dimova, S.
    (2020) English language requirements for enrolment in EMI programmes in higher education: A European case. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 100896. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100896
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100896 [Google Scholar]
  13. DuBay, W.
    (2004) Principles of readability. Impact Information. www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. European Commission
    European Commission (2008) Multilingualism: An asset for Europe and a shared commitment. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0566&from=EN
    [Google Scholar]
  15. European Ministers of Education
    European Ministers of Education (1999) The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999 (IssueJune). The European Higher Education Area. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20877‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferencz, I., Maiworm, F., & Mitic, M.
    (2014) Part II: Traits and daily operation of ETPs. InB. Wächter & F. Maiworm (Eds.), English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014 (pp. 63–97). Lemmens. https://www.lemmens.de/dateien/medien/buecher-ebooks/aca/2014_english_taught.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Galloway, N., Kriukow, J., & Numajiri, T.
    (2017) Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/H035_ELTRA_Internationalisation_HE_and_the_growing_demand_for_English_A4_FINAL_WEB.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Grabe, W., & Zhang, C.
    (2013) Reading and writing together: A critical component of English for academic purposes teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 9–24. 10.1002/tesj.65
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.65 [Google Scholar]
  19. Green, A., Ünaldi, A., & Weir, C.
    (2010) Empiricism versus connoisseurship: Establishing the appropriacy of texts in tests of academic reading. Language Testing, 27(2), 191–211. 10.1177/0265532209349471
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349471 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hellekjær, G. O.
    (2009) Academic English reading proficiency at the university level: A Norwegian case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(2). https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/66829/1/21_2_10125_66829_hellekjaer.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hermida, J.
    (2009) The importance of teaching academic reading skills in first-year university courses. The International Journal of Research and Review, 3, 20–30. 10.2139/ssrn.1419247
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1419247 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holliday, A.
    (2015) Qualitative research and analysis. InB. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 49–62). Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J.
    (2014) English-medium instruction at a Chinese university: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13(1), 21–40. 10.1007/s10993‑013‑9298‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9298-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Koons, H., Bush, L., & Sanford-Moore, E. E.
    (2016) Primary and secondary textbook complexity in England. MetaMetrics. https://metametricsinc.com/research-publications/primary-secondary-textbook-complexity-england/
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lam, Q. K. H., & Maiworm, F.
    (2014) Part III: English in the classroom and beyond. InB. Wächter & F. Maiworm (Eds.), English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014 (pp. 99–118). Lemmens. https://www.lemmens.de/dateien/medien/buecher-ebooks/aca/2014_english_taught.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J.
    (2018) A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. 10.1017/S0261444817000350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mesmer, H. A. E.
    (2008) Tools for matching readers to texts: Research-based practices. Guildford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MetaMetrics
    MetaMetrics (2022, April12). About Lexile® Measures for Reading. https://metametricsinc.com/parents-and-students/lexile-for-parents-and-students/lexile-for-reading/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mežek, Š.
    (2013) Advanced second-language reading and vocabulary learning in the parallel-language university [Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University].
  30. Owen, N., Shrestha, P. N., & Hultgren, A. K.
    (2021) Researching academic reading in two contrasting English as a medium of instruction contexts at a university level (No. RR-91). Educational Testing Service. 10.1002/ets2.12317
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12317 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., Irvine, A., Malmström, H., & Mežek, Š.
    (2012) Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes. Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), 235–256. 10.1080/13538322.2012.706464
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.706464 [Google Scholar]
  32. Riazi, A. M.
    (2016) The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315656762
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656762 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmeiser, C. B.
    (2009) Impact of literacy on college and career readiness and STEM success. https://all4ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ACTPPT041009.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E.
    (2001) Second language research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shaw, P., & McMillion, A.
    (2008) Proficiency effects and compensation in advanced second-language reading. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(3), 123–143. 10.35360/njes.104
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.104 [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith, M., & Williamson, G. L.
    (2016) Aligning the K-12 academic journey with a postsecondary destination. The State Education Standard, 16(1), 14–18. https://nasbe.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/2016/01/Smith-Williamson.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Stenner, A. J.
    (2002) Matching students to text: The targeted reader. samresources.scholastic.com/ResourceManager/previewresource.spr?_page=0&objectId=3218
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Stenner, A. J., Sanford-Moore, E. E., & Burdick, D.
    (2007) The Lexile Framework ® for Reading: Technical report (IssueApril). https://metametricsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Stenner_Burdick_Sanford__Burdick-_The_LFR_Technical_Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stenner, A. J., & Stone, M. H.
    (2004) Does the reader comprehend the text because the reader is able or because the text is easy?International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Uys, M., Walt, J. Van Der, Berg, R. Van Den, & Botha, S.
    (2007) English medium of instruction: A situation analysis. South African Journal of Education, 27(1), 69–82. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150096.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Lanen, R. J., Lockie, N. M., & McGannon, T.
    (2000) Predictors of nursing students’ performance in a one-semester organic and biochemistry course. Chemical Education Research, 77(6), 767–770. 10.1021/ed077p767
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p767 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F.
    (Eds.) (2014) English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens. https://www.lemmens.de/dateien/medien/buecher-ebooks/aca/2014_english_taught.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wilkins, C., Hartman, J., Howland, N., & Sharma, N.
    (2010) How prepared are students for college level reading? Applying a Lexile®-based approach (No.94). REL Southwest. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/REL_2010094.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Williamson, G. L.
    (2004) 1350L Lexile: Matching readers to texts: Student readiness for postsecondary options. The Lexile Framework for Reading, 1–30. https://metametricsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/StudentReadinessforPostsecondaryOptionsv4_1_MetaMetricsWhitepaper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Williamson, G. L., Koons, H., Sandvik, T., & Sanford-Moore, E. E.
    (2012) The text complexity continuum in grades 1–12. MetaMetrics. https://metametricsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Research_Brief-Text_Continuum_Grades_1-12_1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Williamson, G. L., Sandvik, T., Stenner, A. J., & Johnson, A.
    (2016) Complexity of university texts in the United Kingdom. MetaMetrics. https://metametricsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/MM_UK_University_Research_Digital.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.21006.hol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.21006.hol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Aptis test; assessing reading; EMI reading; Lexile framework
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error