1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2666-8882
  • E-ISSN: 2666-8890
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

EMI assessment research designed to compare academic achievement in EMI and L1-medium courses aims to examine language and content learning outcomes (Dafouz & Camacho-Miñano, 2016Hernández-Nanclares & Jiménez-Munoz, 2015Yang, 2015). However, these studies provide little insight into learning processes. A genre analysis perspective, in contrast, can offer a deeper understanding of the development of student disciplinary literacy. Based on genre analysis studies on student writing (Nesi & Gardner, 2012Parkinson, 2017Swales, 1990), we aim to describe the written genre in student laboratory reports from an EMI course on a Mechanical Engineering degree programme. Seven students’ laboratory reports as well as the lecturer’s instructions, the assessment rubric, and written feedback were examined using genre analysis. This case study contributes to the emerging literature on assessment in EMI by foregrounding the advantages of genre analysis as an analytical methodology and shedding light on students’ development of literacy in disciplinary writing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.21008.man
2022-08-25
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aguilar, M., & Muñoz, C.
    (2014) The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in Engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–18. 10.1111/ijal.12006
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Airey, J.
    (2011) The disciplinary literacy discussion matrix: A heuristic tool for initiating collaboration in higher education. Across the Disciplines, 8(3), 1–9. 10.37514/ATD‑J.2011.8.3.18
    https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2011.8.3.18 [Google Scholar]
  3. Airey, J., & Linder, C.
    (2009) A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49. 10.1002/tea.20265
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20265 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aizawa, I., Rose, H., Thompson, G., & Curle, S.
    (2020) Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency and linguistic challenges experienced by Japanese students in an English Medium Instruction programme. Language Teaching Research, 1–25. 10.1177/1362168820965510
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820965510 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A.
    (2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boud, D., & Molloy, E.
    (2013) What is the problem with feedback?InD. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Breeze, R., & Dafouz, E.
    (2017) Constructing complex cognitive discourse functions in higher education: An exploratory study of exam answers in Spanish- and English-medium instruction settings. System, 70, 81–91. 10.1016/j.system.2017.09.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.024 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chell, G., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Iiskala, T. & Dillon, A.
    (2021) A comparative study of academic literacy in English medium instruction programs in UAE and Finland. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 56–75. www.iier.org.au/iier31/2021conts.html
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Costa, F., & Mariotti, C.
    (2017) Students’ outcomes in English-medium instruction: Is there any difference related to discipline?L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria, 25, 361–371. https://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/index.php/ojs/article/view/143
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dafouz, E., & Camacho-Miñano, M. M.
    (2016) Exploring the impact of English-medium instruction on university student academic achievement: The case of accounting. English for Specific Purposes, 44, 57–67. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardner, S., & Holmes, J.
    (2010) From section headings to assignment macrostructures in undergraduate student writing. InE. Swain (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 268–290). EUT.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrington, K.
    (2011) The roles of assessment in ‘Writing in the Disciplines’. InM. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 48–62). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑34451‑8_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34451-8_4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hernández-Nanclares, N., & Jiménez-Munoz, A.
    (2015) English as a medium of instruction: Evidence for language and content targets in bilingual education in economics. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(7), 883–896. 10.1080/13670050.2015.1125847
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1125847 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyland, K.
    (2013) ESP and writing. In. B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), Handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 95–114). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Johns, A.
    (2008) Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(2), 237–252. 10.1017/S0261444807004892
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004892 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lei, J., & Hu, G.
    (2014) Is English-medium instruction effective in improving Chinese undergraduate students’ English competence?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 99–126. 10.1515/iral‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, N., & Wu, J.
    (2018) Exploring assessment for learning practices in the EMI classroom in the context of Taiwanese higher education. Language Education & Assessment, 1(1), 28–44. 10.29140/lea.v1n1.46
    https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v1n1.46 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2021) Researching assessment in EMI. In. J. K. H. Pun & S. M. Curle (Eds.), Research methods in English medium instruction (pp. 61–74). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003025115‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025115-5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J.
    (2018) A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. 10.1017/S0261444817000350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350 [Google Scholar]
  21. Malmström, H., & Pecorari, D.
    (2021) Disciplinary literacies as a nexus for content and language teacher practice. InD. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university (pp. 213–221). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003134534‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134534-11 [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2008) Genre relations: Mapping cultures. Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
    (2012) Genres across the disciplines. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009030199
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199 [Google Scholar]
  24. Parkinson, J.
    (2017) The student laboratory report genre: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 1–13. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G.
    (2020) What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149–2161. 10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sánchez-Pérez, M.
    (2021) Predicting content proficiency through disciplinary-literacy variables in English-medium writing. System, 97, 1–12. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102463
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102463 [Google Scholar]
  27. Swales, J.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B.
    (2004) Academic writing for graduate students. University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tardy, C., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J.
    (2020) Teaching and researching genre knowledge: Toward an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication, 37(3), 287–321. 10.1177/0741088320916554
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916554 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wingate, U.
    (2015) Academic literacy and student diversity. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783093496
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093496 [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, W.
    (2015) Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 361–382. 10.1080/13670050.2014.904840
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.904840 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.21008.man
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.21008.man
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): disciplinary literacy; EMI assessment; genre analysis; laboratory report
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error