1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2666-8882
  • E-ISSN: 2666-8890

Abstract

Abstract

Although the efficacy levels of interdisciplinary teacher collaboration attained at pre-university level are well documented, research in higher education contexts is still scarce. Macaro et al. (2016) earlier reported on a quasi-experimental intervention project conducted in Türkiye with an objective to promote collaboration between nine pairs of English language specialists and content teachers from four universities, and the analyses of the pre- and post-intervention interviews suggested that this sort of collaboration can be highly beneficial. This paper, however, puts the research tool, the Collaborative Planning Tool (CPT), into perspective by describing a learning-centred approach to research design as a way to better understand interdisciplinary teacher collaboration. By re-examining the extant research data (audio-recorded discussions of 72 collaborative planning sessions), this paper presents new findings (clustered under three emerging themes: use of the CPT; interplay between language and content; and the role of feedback in lesson planning), suggesting that the CPT can provide an effective framework for interdisciplinary teacher collaboration in EMI university settings. A discussion of the concept of quality in EMI is also presented.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.23004.aki
2024-03-19
2024-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemi.23004.aki.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.23004.aki&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aguilar, M., & Muñoz, C.
    (2013) The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–18. 10.1111/ijal.12006
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akıncıoğlu, M.
    (2023) Rethinking of EMI in higher education: a critical view on its scope, definition and quality. Language, Culture and Curriculum, advance online publication. 10.1080/07908318.2023.2251519
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2023.2251519 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2012) A critical approach to textbook analysis: Critical discourse analysis (CDA) of two EAP textbooks (Unpublished MLitt. dissertation). University of St Andrews, Scotland.
  4. British Council/ Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı
    British Council/ Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı (2015) The state of English in higher education in Turkey: A baseline study. British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brookfield, S. D.
    (2017) Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chopey, M.
    (2015) Investigating teacher partnerships for CLIL: Developing a model for subject-content and language teacher pedagogic collaboration towards integration, [Doctoral dissertation, University of Aberdeen]. Open Access Thesis and Dissertations.
  7. Coleman, J. A.
    (2006) English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14. 10.1017/S026144480600320X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X [Google Scholar]
  8. Contero, C., Zayas, F., & Arco, J. I.
    (2018) Addressing CLIL lecturers’ needs: Reflections on specific methodological training. Porta linguarum (special issue 3), 121–135. 10.30827/Digibug.54305
    https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54305 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dafouz, E., & Smit, U.
    (2020) Road-mapping English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23463‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23463-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davison, C.
    (2006) Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475. 10.2167/beb339.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb339.0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dimova, S., & Kling, J.
    (2018) Assessing English-medium instruction lecturer language proficiency across disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 634–56. 10.1002/tesq.454
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.454 [Google Scholar]
  12. Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2021) Analysing EMI teachers’ and students’ talk about language and language use. InD. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university: International perspectives on teacher practice (pp.34–55). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003134534‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134534-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2013) Globalisation, internationalisation, multilingualism and linguistic strains in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1407–1421. 10.1080/03075079.2011.642349
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.642349 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dubow, G., Gundermann, S., & Northover, L.
    (2021) Establishing quality criteria and an EMI certification procedure. InJ. K. H. Pun & S. M. Curle (Eds.). Research methods in English medium instruction. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003025115‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025115-6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dudley-Evans, T.
    (2001) Team-teaching in EAP. InJ. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.). Research perspectives in English for academic purposes (pp.225–238). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524766.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R.
    (2020) The provision of student support on English medium instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 451, Article 100846. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100846
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100846 [Google Scholar]
  17. Godínez, J. M.
    (2018) How effective is collaborative reflective practice in enabling cognitive transformation in English language teachers?Reflective Practice Journal, 19(4), 427–446. 10.1080/14623943.2018.1479688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1479688 [Google Scholar]
  18. Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. G.
    (2019) Preparing teachers for co-teaching and collaboration. InL. C. de Olivera (Ed.), The handbook of TESOL in K-12 (pp.405–422). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119421702.ch26
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421702.ch26 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J.
    (2014) English-medium instruction at a Chinese university: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13(1), 21–40. 10.1007/s10993‑013‑9298‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9298-3 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobs, C.
    (2010) Collaboration as pedagogy: Consequences and implications for partnerships between communication and disciplinary specialists. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 28(3), 227–237. 10.2989/16073614.2010.545025
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2010.545025 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R.
    (2016) Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315641447
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641447 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kırkgöz, Y.
    (2014) Students’ perceptions of English language versus Turkish language used as the medium of instruction in higher education in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 9(12), 443–459. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.7596
    https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7596 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirkpatrick, A., & Liddicote, A. J.
    (2017) Language education policy and practice in East Asia and Southeast Asia. Language Teaching, 50(2), 155–188. 10.1017/S0261444817000027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000027 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kortmann, B.
    (2019) Language policies at the LERU member institutions (Briefing Paper No 4). League of European Research Universities.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuteeva, M., & Airey, J.
    (2014) Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent policy developments, Higher Education, 67(5), 533–549. 10.1007/s10734‑013‑9660‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lantolf, J. P.
    (2007) Socio-cultural theory: A unified approach to L2 learning and teaching. InJ. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of language teaching: Part 1 (pp.693–701). Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑46301‑8_45
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_45 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2018) Fostering team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level. Language Teaching, 51(3), 400–416. 10.1017/S0261444818000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000113 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2015) A glimpse into the effectiveness of L2-content cross-curricular collaboration in content-based instruction programs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 443–462. 10.1080/13670050.2014.916654
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.916654 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyster, R.
    (2017) Preface. InJ. Valcke & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education: Perspectives and professional practice (pp.7–14). Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑07263‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-07263-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Macaro, E., & Aizawa, I.
    (2022) Who owns English medium instruction?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. 10.1080/01434632.2022.2136187
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2136187 [Google Scholar]
  31. Macaro, E., & Akıncıoğlu, M.
    (2018) Turkish university students’ perceptions about English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256–270. 10.1080/01434632.2017.1367398
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1367398 [Google Scholar]
  32. Macaro, E., Akıncıoğlu, M., & Dearden, J.
    (2016) English medium instruction in universities: A collaborative experiment in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 51–76. 10.22158/selt.v4n1p51
    https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v4n1p51 [Google Scholar]
  33. Macaro, E., Akıncıoğlu, M., & Han, S.
    (2020) English medium instruction in higher education: Teacher perspectives on professional development and certification. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 301, 144–157. 10.1111/ijal.12272
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12272 [Google Scholar]
  34. Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J.
    (2018) A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. 10.1017/S0261444817000350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350 [Google Scholar]
  35. Marrongelle, K., Sztajn, P., & Smith, M.
    (2013) Scaling up professional development in an era of common state standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 202–211. 10.1177/0022487112473838
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473838 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez, R.
    (2016) English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in Brazilian higher education: Challenges and opportunities. InK. R. Finardi (Ed.), English in Brazil: Views, policies and programs (pp.191–228). EDUEL.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McKinley, J., & Rose, H.
    (2022) English language teaching and English-medium instruction: Putting research into practice. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(1), 85–104. 10.1075/jemi.21026.mck
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.21026.mck [Google Scholar]
  38. McKinley, J., Sahan, K., Zhou, S. & Rose, H.
    (2023) Researching EMI policy and practice multilingually: Reflections from China and Turkey. Language and Education, 10.1080/09500782.2023.2246954
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2246954 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mercer, N.
    (2010) The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. 10.1348/000709909X479853
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853 [Google Scholar]
  40. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M.
    (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Murray, N.
    (2022) A model to support the equitable development of academic literacy in institutions of higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(8), 1054–1065. 10.1080/0309877X.2022.2044019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2044019 [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Dowd, R.
    (2018) The training and accreditation of teachers for English medium instruction: An overview of practice in European universities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), 553–63. 10.1080/13670050.2018.1491945
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1491945 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pavón, V., Avila, J., Gallego, A., & Espejo, R.
    (2015) Strategic and organisational considerations in planning content and language integrated learning: A study on the coordination between content and language teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 409–425. 10.1080/13670050.2014.909774
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.909774 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H.
    (2018) At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497–515. 10.1002/tesq.470
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.470 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pérez-Cañado, M. L.
    (2020) Addressing the research gap in teacher training for EMI: An evidence-based teacher education proposal in monolingual contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 481, 1–22. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100927
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100927 [Google Scholar]
  46. Saarinen, T., & Taalas, P.
    (2017) Nordic language policies for higher education and their multi-layered motivations. Higher Education, 73(4), 597–612. 10.1007/s10734‑015‑9981‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9981-8 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sánchez-Pérez, M. M.
    (2020) Teacher training for English-medium instruction in higher education. IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑7998‑2318‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2318-6 [Google Scholar]
  48. Senn, G., McMurtrie, D., & Coleman, B.
    (2019) Collaboration in the middle: Teachers in interdisciplinary planning. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 24(1), 25–31. 10.20429/cimle.2019.240106
    https://doi.org/10.20429/cimle.2019.240106 [Google Scholar]
  49. Spolsky, B.
    (Ed.) (2012) The Cambridge handbook of language policy. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511979026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026 [Google Scholar]
  50. Taguchi, N.
    (2014) English-medium education in the global society: Introduction to the special issue. International Review of Applied Linguistics for Language Teaching, 52(2), 89–98. 10.1515/iral‑2014‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Valcke, J., & Wilkinson, R.
    (2017) Introduction: ICLHE, professional practice, disruption, and quality. InJ. Valcke & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education: Perspectives and professional practice (pp.15–24). Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑07263‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-07263-1 [Google Scholar]
  52. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1986) Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed.). MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Yuan, R.
    (2021) Promoting English-as-a-medium-of-instruction (EMI) teacher development in higher education: What can language specialists do and become?RELC Journal. Advance online publication. 10.1177/0033688220980173
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220980173 [Google Scholar]
  54. Yüksel, D., Soruç, A., Altay, M., & Curle, S.
    (2023) A longitudinal study at an English medium instruction university in Turkey: The interplay between English language improvement and academic success. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(3), 533–552. 10.1515/applirev‑2020‑0097
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0097 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.23004.aki
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.23004.aki
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error