1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of English-Medium Instruction
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Importance marking in EMI and L1 lectures
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study compares how lecturers signal important points with metadiscursive importance markers (e.g., ; ) when they lecture in English as their first language (L1) as opposed to English as an additional language (English-medium instruction, EMI). Importance marking is a feature of discourse structuring, which is widely advocated for inclusion in listening and lecturing training. We analysed a corpus of 46 engineering lectures from Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand and the UK. Comparing the EMI with the L1 corpus revealed that importance marking happened to the same extent. However, this belies substantial frequency differences between the two components that make up each of these corpora. We further found that both L1 and EMI lecturers used a large variety of markers and lexis. Overwhelmingly, differences could not be attributed to the different lecture contexts. Instead, they were typically due to idiolect. This suggests the specificity of language use in lectures and the dangers in lumping together varieties as representing EMI or L1 lecture discourse. We conclude with pedagogical implications for lecturer training.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
2025-04-08
2025-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, A.
    (2010) Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, (), –. 10.35360/njes.218
     https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Khan, S.
    (2022) Metadiscourse use when shifting from L1 to EMI lecturing: implications for teacher training. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/17501229.2022.2057503
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2057503 [Google Scholar]
  3. Airey, J., & Linder, C.
    (2006) Language and the experience of learning university physics in Sweden. European Journal of Physics, , –. 10.1088/0143‑0807/27/3/009
     https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/27/3/009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Akincioğlu, M.
    (2023) Rethinking of EMI in higher education: A critical view on its scope, definition and quality. Language Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2023.2251519
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2023.2251519 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allison, D., & Tauroza, S.
    (1995) The effect of discourse organisation on lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/0889‑4906(95)00007‑E
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(95)00007-E [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernad-Mechó, E.
    (2024) Building successful communication in EMI contexts: A multimodal approach to organizational metadiscourse in intercultural lectures. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/CJAL‑2024‑0206
     https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2024-0206 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernad-Mechó, E., & Fortanet-Gómez, I.
    (2019) Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles: Metadiscourse beyond language. InI. C. Sancho-Guinda (Ed.), Engagement in professional genres: Deference and disclosure (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.301.17ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.17ber [Google Scholar]
  8. Björkman, B.
    (2010) So you think you can ELF: English as a lingua franca as the medium of instruction. Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication Studies, , –. 10.7146/hjlcb.v23i45.97348
     https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v23i45.97348 [Google Scholar]
  9. Broggini, S., & Murphy, A. C.
    (2017) Metadiscourse in EMI lectures: Reflections on a small corpus of spoken academic discourse. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria XXV, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng, S. W.
    (2012) “That’s it for today”: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clerehan, R.
    (1995) Taking it down: Notetaking practices of L1 and L2 students. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/0889‑4906(95)00003‑A
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(95)00003-A [Google Scholar]
  12. Costa, F., & Mariotti, C.
    (2017) Differences in content presentation and learning outcomes in English-medium instruction (EMI) vs. Italian-medium instruction (IMI) contexts. InR. Wilkinson & M. L. Walsh (Eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education: From theory to practice: Selected papers from the 2013 ICLHE conference (pp.–). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. (2023) Input in English-medium instruction. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003258407
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003258407 [Google Scholar]
  14. Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
    (2004) Audience-oriented relevance markers in business studies lectures. InG. Del Lungo Camiciotti & E. Tognini Bonelli (Eds.), Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation (pp.–). Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0784‑5/7
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0784-5/7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dafouz Milne, E., & Núñez Perucha, B.
    (2010) Metadiscursive devices in university lectures: A contrastive analysis of L1 and L2 teacher performance. InT. N. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Ed.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.7.11daf
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.11daf [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng, L., & Wannaruk, A.
    (2021) A contrastive study of rhetorical move structure of English medium instruction lectures given by native English and Chinese lecturers. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Deroey, K. L. B.
    (2014a, 19–21June). Importance marking in lectures by native and non-native speakers [Conference presentation]. IVACS International Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2014b) “Anyway, the point I’m making is”: Lexicogrammatical relevance marking in lectures. InL. Vandelanotte, D. Kristin, G. Caroline & K. Ditte (Eds.), Recent advances in corpus linguistics: Developing and exploiting corpora (pp.–). Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401211130_013
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211130_013 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2015) Marking importance in lectures: Interactive and textual orientation. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt029
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt029 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2018) The representativeness of lecture listening coursebooks: Language, lectures, research-informedness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2023) English medium instruction lecturer training programmes: Content, delivery, ways forward. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , Article 101223. 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101223
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101223 [Google Scholar]
  22. Deroey, K. L. B., & Taverniers, M.
    (2012a) “Ignore that ‘cause it’s totally irrelevant”: Marking lesser relevance in lectures. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2012b) Just remember this: Lexicogrammatical relevance markers in lectures. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. deWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, R. A.
    (2002) Successful lecturing: Presenting information in ways that engage effective processing. New directions for teaching and learning, , –. 10.1002/tl.44
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.44 [Google Scholar]
  25. Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2022) Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: An ELF perspective. System, , Article 102730. 10.1016/j.system.2022.102730
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102730 [Google Scholar]
  26. Duszak, A.
    (1997) Culture and styles of academic discourse. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110821048
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernández Polo, F. J.
    (2024) If you look at the table...: Directives in conference presentations and university lectures. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12504
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12504 [Google Scholar]
  28. Field, J.
    (2012) The cognitive validity of the lecture-based question in the IELTS listening paper. IELTS collected papers, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L.
    (1996) Lecturer perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lectures. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/003368829602700102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829602700102 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fortanet, I.
    (2004) The use of “we” in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(03)00018‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00018-8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gray, B., & Biber, D.
    (2013) Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.18.1.08gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.08gra [Google Scholar]
  32. Hultgren, A. K., Owen, N., Shrestha, P., Kuteeva, M., & Mežek, Š.
    (2022) Assessment and English as a medium of instruction: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, (), –. 10.1075/jemi.21019.hul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.21019.hul [Google Scholar]
  33. Ibrahim, N. M., & Ahmad, U. K.
    (2014) “… so it is very important...”: Evaluative adjectives in engineering lectures. Kajian Malaysia, (Supp. 1), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnson, J. H.
    (2024) “This is for sure a question at your exams”: Assessment references in EMI and L1 engineering lectures. ESP Today, (), –. 10.18485/esptoday.2024.12.1.8
     https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2024.12.1.8 [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnson, J. H., & Picciuolo, M.
    (2022) The EMIBO corpus: A resource for investigating lecture discourse across disciplines and lecture modes in an EMI context. Lingue e Linguaggi, , –. 10.1285/i22390359v53p253
     https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v53p253 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jung, E. H. S.
    (2003) The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00208
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00208 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kiewra, K. A.
    (2002) How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, (), –. 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrž, P., Tugwell, D.
    (2004) The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress. pp. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, J. J.
    (2009) Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K.
    (2016) Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, (), –. 10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0162
     https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0162 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin, C. Y.
    (2012) Modifiers in BASE and MICASE: A matter of academic cultures or lecturing styles?English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, C. -Y., & Chen, H. -J. H.
    (2022) A phraseological exploration of university lectures through phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , Article 101135. 10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101135
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101135 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lynch, T.
    (1994) Training lecturers for international audiences. InJ. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524612.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524612.020 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mauranen, A.
    (2023) Reflexively speaking: Metadiscourse in English as a Lingua Franca. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110295498
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295498 [Google Scholar]
  45. Molino, A.
    (2018) “What I’m speaking is almost English. . . “: A corpus-based study of metadiscourse in English-medium lectures at an Italian university. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, , –. 10.12738/estp.2018.4.0330
     https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0330 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2019) Lexical bundles in EMI lectures: An exploratory study. Textus, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Morell, T.
    (2000) EFL content lectures: A discourse analysis of an interactive and a non-interactive style. Working papers. Alicante, Spain: Departamento de Filologi’a Inglesa, Universidad de Alicante.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mulligan, D., & Kirkpatrick, A.
    (2000) How much do they understand? Lectures, students and comprehension. Higher Education Research and Development, (), –. 10.1080/758484352
     https://doi.org/10.1080/758484352 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nesi, H.
    (2001) A corpus-based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines. InJ. Cotterill & A. Ife (Eds.), Language across boundaries: BAAL. (pp.–). Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Olsen, L. A., & Huckin, T. H.
    (1990) Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/0889‑4906(90)90027‑A
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(90)90027-A [Google Scholar]
  51. Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H.
    (2018) At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.470
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.470 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rowley-Jolivet, E.
    (2002) Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00024‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00024-7 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sánchez-García, D.
    (2019) “I can’t find the words now...”: Teacher Discourse Strategies and their Communicative Potential in Spanish-and English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education. CLIL: Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, (), –. 10.5565/rev/clil.28
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.28 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schleef, E.
    (2009) A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  55. Seidlhofer, B.
    (2009) Accommodation and the idiom principle in English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics(), –. 10.1515/IPRG.2009.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.011 [Google Scholar]
  56. Siegel, J.
    (2020) Comprehension in English medium instruction (EMI) lectures: On the impact of lecturer L2 English use. Language Learning in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1515/cercles‑2020‑2005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2020-2005 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2022) Factors affecting notetaking performance. International Journal of Listening, (), –. 10.1080/10904018.2022.2059484
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2022.2059484 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sinclair, J. M. H.
    (2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203594070
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203594070 [Google Scholar]
  59. SketchEngine
    SketchEngine: www.sketchengine.eu/
  60. Tao, H.
    (2001) Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. InR. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America (pp.–). University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Titsworth, B. S., & Kiewra, K. A.
    (2004) Spoken organizational lecture cues and student notetaking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  62. Titsworth, B. S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A.
    (2015) Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, , –. 10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang, Y.
    (2018) Formulaic sequences signalling discourse organisation in ELF academic lectures: A disciplinary perspective. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, (), –. 10.1515/jelf‑2018‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2018-0017 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wardaugh, R. & Fuller, J. M.
    (2021) An introduction to sociolinguistics. Wiley Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Wegener, R., Schüller, B., & Cassens, J.
    (2017) Needing and wanting in academic lectures: Profiling the academic lecture across contexts. InP. Chappell & J. S. Knox (Eds.), Transforming contexts: Papers from the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress (pp.). Organising Committee of the44th International Systemic Functional Congress.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C.
    (2002) Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, (), –. 10.1353/jge.2003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  67. Yeager, R., Park, G., & Liao, R. J.
    (2024) Notetaking as validity evidence: A mixed-methods investigation of question preview in EAP listening assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , Article 101346. 10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101346
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101346 [Google Scholar]
  68. Yeo, J. -Y., & Ting, S. -H.
    (2014) Personal pronouns for student engagement in arts and science lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  69. Young, L.
    (1994) University lectures: Macro-structure and micro-features. InJ. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524612.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524612.013 [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, L., & Lo, Y. Y.
    (2021) EMI teachers’ use of interactive metadiscourse in lecture organisation and knowledge construction. InD. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university: International perspectives on teacher practice (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003134534‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134534-4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
Loading
Importance marking in EMI and L1 lectures
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: English-medium instruction (EMI) ; English for academic purposes (EAP) ; lecture ; discourse structure ; metadiscourse ; importance marker

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error