1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2666-8882
  • E-ISSN: 2666-8890
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

English as a medium of instruction (EMI) has been adopted as an official education policy in Taiwan, leading to a significant expansion of EMI programs across universities in recent years. Substantial resources have been allocated to enhance teachers’ professional development in EMI. The purpose of this study is twofold. First, it uses a questionnaire to examine EMI teachers’ self-reported assessment practices in their classrooms and their perceived levels of skillfulness in assessment techniques. Second, it explores the challenges and assessment training needs of EMI teachers through interviews. The findings indicate a growing awareness among EMI teachers of the effect of instructional medium on learning, leading them to employ supportive strategies in assessment. However, additional guidance on assessment is needed to reduce excessive reliance on personal experiences. The results of this study underscore the need for institute-level guidelines, institutional support, and targeted professional development in assessment to ensure effective practices that align with the goals of EMI. These findings have significant implications for improving EMI teacher assessment literacy and advancing EMI professional development courses within an EFL context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24019.li
2025-04-30
2025-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Airey, J.
    (2012) “I don’t teach language”: The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 251, 64–79. 10.1075/aila.25.05air
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.05air [Google Scholar]
  2. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association
    American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association (1990) Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30–32. 10.1111/j.1745‑3992.1990.tb00391.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1990.tb00391.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
    (2010) Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D.
    (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74. 10.1080/0969595980050102
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  6. Carless, D.
    (2015) Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 691, 963–976. 10.1007/s10734‑014‑9816‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z [Google Scholar]
  7. Chin, J. S., & Li, N.
    (2021) Exploring the language and pedagogical models suitable for EMI in Chinese-speaking higher education contexts. InL. I-W. Su, H. Cheung & J. R. W. Wu (Eds.), Rethinking EMI: Multidisciplinary perspectives from Chinese-speaking regions (pp. 1–20). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429352362‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429352362-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L.
    (2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Executive Yuan, Taiwan
    (2002) The challenge 2008: National development plan. https://shorturl.at/9ITnT
  10. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C.
    (2005) Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 3–31. eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/3609
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu, G., & Li, X.
    (2017) Asking and answering questions in English-medium instruction classrooms: What is the cognitive and syntactic complexity level?InJ. Zhao & L. Q. Dixon (Eds.), English-medium instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse and evaluation (pp. 184–203). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315618623‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618623-10 [Google Scholar]
  12. Inbar-Lourie, O.
    (2022) EMI programs and formative assessment: Implications for the assessment literacy of content lecturers. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(2), 204–231. 10.1075/jemi.21014.inb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.21014.inb [Google Scholar]
  13. Kane, M.
    (2010) Validity and fairness. Language Testing, 27(2), 177–182. 10.1177/0265532209349467
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349467 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kao, Y-T., & Tsou, W.
    (2017) EMI course assessment: A survey study of the issues. InW. Tsou & S-M. Kao (Eds.), English as a medium of instruction in higher education: Implementations and classroom practices in Taiwan (pp. 183–205). Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4645‑2_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4645-2_11 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kunnan, A. J.
    (2018) Evaluating language assessments. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, N., & Wu, J.
    (2018) Exploring assessment for learning practices in the EMI classroom in the context of Taiwanese higher education. Language Education & Assessment, 11, 28–44. 10.29140/lea.v1n1.46
    https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v1n1.46 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2021) Researching assessment in EMI. InJ. K. H. Pun & S. M. Curle (Eds.), Research methods in English medium instruction (pp. 61–74). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003025115‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025115-5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Migiro, S. O., & Magangi, B. A.
    (2011) Mixed methods: A review of literature and the future of the new research paradigm. African Journal of Business Management, 5(10), 3757–3764. 10.5897/AJBM09.082
    https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM09.082 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ministry of Education, Taiwan
    Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2021a) The program on bilingual education for students in college. https://shorturl.at/vdtFu
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ministry of Education, Taiwan
    Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2021b) (Institution name) The program on bilingual education for students in college. https://shorturl.at/vAtja
    [Google Scholar]
  21. National Development Council, Taiwan
    National Development Council, Taiwan (2018) Blueprint for developing Taiwan into a bilingual nation by 2030. https://shorturl.at/ZHU8W
  22. Popham, W. J.
    (2009) Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental?Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. 10.1080/00405840802577536
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536 [Google Scholar]
  23. Reierstam, H.
    (2024) Assessment of content and language: The case of CLIL, EMI, and multilingual contexts. InM. D. Ramírez-Verdugo (Ed.), Transnational approaches to bilingual and second language teacher education (pp. 197–218). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003348580‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003348580-14 [Google Scholar]
  24. Stiggins, R. J.
    (1991) Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C.
    (2010) SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE. 10.4135/9781506335193
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193 [Google Scholar]
  26. Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E.
    (2016) Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. InD. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 255–274). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614513827‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-018 [Google Scholar]
  27. Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C.
    (2017) Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach’s alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163–173. 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189 [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L.
    (2016) Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 581, 149–162. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Yorke, M.
    (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501. 10.1023/A:1023967026413
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24019.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jemi.24019.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error