Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
Preview this article:

This work was made publicly available by the publisher.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B.
    (2011) Language and superdiversity: A position paper. Working papers in urban language and literacies, 701. Retrieved on1 February 2022fromwww.kcl.ac.uk/ldc
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Canagarajah, A. S.
    (1996) “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 131, 435–472. 10.1177/0741088396013004001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013004001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T.
    (2010) Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 291, 281–295. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Flowerdew, J.
    (2000) Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127–150. 10.2307/3588099
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588099 [Google Scholar]
  5. Lillis, T.
    (2012) Economies of signs in writing for academic publication: The case of English Medium “National” Journals. Journal of Advanced Composition, 32(3–4), 695–722.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J.
    (2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. 10.1177/0741088305283754
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305283754 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lillis, T., & Maybin, J.
    (2017) Introduction: The dynamics of textual trajectories in professional and workplace practice. Text & Talk, 37(4), 409–414. 10.1515/text‑2017‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0017 [Google Scholar]
  8. Maybin, J.
    (2017) Textual trajectories: Theoretical roots and institutional consequences, Text & Talk, 37(4), 415–435. 10.1515/text‑2017‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0011 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Editorial
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error