f Editorial

References

1. Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B.
   (2011) Language and superdiversity: A position paper. Working papers in urban language and literacies, 701. Retrieved on1 February 2022fromwww.kcl.ac.uk/ldc
   [Google Scholar]
2. Canagarajah, A. S.
   (1996) “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 131, 435–472. 10.1177/0741088396013004001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013004001 [Google Scholar]
3. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T.
   (2010) Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 291, 281–295. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002 [Google Scholar]
4. Flowerdew, J.
   (2000) Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127–150. 10.2307/3588099
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3588099 [Google Scholar]
5. Lillis, T.
   (2012) Economies of signs in writing for academic publication: The case of English Medium “National” Journals. Journal of Advanced Composition, 32(3–4), 695–722.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J.
   (2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. 10.1177/0741088305283754
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305283754 [Google Scholar]
7. Lillis, T., & Maybin, J.
   (2017) Introduction: The dynamics of textual trajectories in professional and workplace practice. Text & Talk, 37(4), 409–414. 10.1515/text‑2017‑0017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0017 [Google Scholar]
8. Maybin, J.
   (2017) Textual trajectories: Theoretical roots and institutional consequences, Text & Talk, 37(4), 415–435. 10.1515/text‑2017‑0011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0011 [Google Scholar]