1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This case study tracks a multilingual writer’s academic writing, in particular her engagement in the research article (RA) genre, over the course of four years as she moved along a trajectory from a novice graduate student to a confident disciplinary writer. The theoretical framework draws from academic literacies (Barton & Hamilton, 1998), highlighting practice and disposition (Bourdieu, 1990) as a way of understanding engagement with the RA genre. The findings, based on an analysis of interviews conducted with the participant, reveal three stages of the participant’s development in her disposition toward the RA genre, all interspersed with affect. Each stage is illustrated through examples from the interviews. The study’s longitudinal design provides a novel perspective that brings out a dynamic picture of the of a graduate student writer. The findings are discussed in light of previous research and pedagogical implications are set out.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00015.sha
2023-12-19
2024-10-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, C., Kamler, B., & Lee, A.
    (Eds.) (2010) Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203860960
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203860960 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M.
    (1998) Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2000) Literacy Practices. InD. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context (pp.7–15). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazerman, C.
    (2004) Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. InC. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp.309–339). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Belcher, D. D.
    (2009) How research space is created in a diverse research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 221–234. 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, P.
    (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Trans.Richard Nice. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1990) In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Trans.Matthew Adamson. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503621558
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558 [Google Scholar]
  8. Canagarajah, A. S.
    (1996) “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13(4), 435–472. 10.1177/0741088396013004001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013004001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cargill, M., & Burgess, S.
    (Eds.) (2017) Publishing research in English as an additional language: Practices, pathways and potentials. University of Adelaide Press. 10.20851/english‑pathways
    https://doi.org/10.20851/english-pathways [Google Scholar]
  10. Casanave, C. P.
    (2005) Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Routledge. 10.4324/9781410612366
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612366 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2010) Dovetailing under impossible circumstances. InC. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp.47–63). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Casanave, C. P., & Li, X.
    (2008) Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.231189
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.231189 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cho, S.
    (2004) Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of nonnative-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3(1), 47–72. 10.1207/s15327701jlie0301_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0301_3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M.
    (2010) Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 29(4), 281–295. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahl, T.
    (2004) Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807–1825. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Duff, P.
    (2007) Case study research in applied linguistics. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferenz, O.
    (2005) EFL writers’ social networks: Impact on advanced academic literacy development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 339–351. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Flowerdew, J.
    (2019) The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52(2), 249–260. 10.1017/S0261444819000041
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041 [Google Scholar]
  19. González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M.
    (2019) How do doctoral students experience supervision?Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 293–307. 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520208
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520208 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gosden, H.
    (1995) Success in research article writing and revision: A social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 141, 37–57. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)00022‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)00022-6 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1996) Verbal reports of Japanese novices’ research writing practices in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 51, 109–128. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(96)90021‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90021-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Habibie, P.
    (2016) Writing for scholarly publication in a Canadian higher education context: A case study. InC. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp.51–67) (Vol.311). Brill. 10.1163/9789004304338_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Habibie, P. & Hyland, K.
    (Eds.) (2019) Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Horta, H., & Li, H.
    (2023) Nothing but publishing: The overriding goal of PhD students in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. Studies in Higher Education, 48(2), 263–282. 10.1080/03075079.2022.2131764
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2131764 [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang, J. C.
    (2010) Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES PhD students in science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 33–44. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyland, K. & Jiang, F. K.
    (2018) “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 511, 18–30. 10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyland, K. & Tse, P.
    (2005) Evaluative that constructions: Signaling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12 (1), 39–64. 10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl [Google Scholar]
  28. Hyland, K.
    (2004) Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23927
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927 [Google Scholar]
  29. (1996) Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17 (4): 433–454. 10.1093/applin/17.4.433
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V.
    (2006) The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into practice, 45(4), 368–377. 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, E. & Canagarajah, S.
    (2018) The connection between transcultural dispositions and translingual practices in academic writing. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 14(1), 14–28. 10.1080/17447143.2018.1501375
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2018.1501375 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lei, J., & Hu, G.
    (2019) Doctoral candidates’ dual role as student and expert scholarly writer: An activity theory perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 541, 62–74. 10.1016/j.esp.2018.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Leonard, R. L.
    (2014) Multilingual writing as rhetorical attunement. College English, 76(3), 227–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lei, S. A., & Chuang, N.
    (2009) Research collaboration and publication during graduate studies: Evaluating benefits and costs from students’ perspectives. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1163–1168.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Y.
    (2006) A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes, 251, 456–478. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2007) Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An intraview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 55–79. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00040.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00040.x [Google Scholar]
  37. (2016) “Publish SCI papers or no degree”: Practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 545–558. 10.1080/02188791.2015.1005050
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1005050 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
    (2006) Reframing notions of competence in scholarly writing: From individual to networked activity. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 531, 63–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lillis, T.
    (2008) Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”: Closing the Gap Between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research. Written Communication, 251, 353–388. 10.1177/0741088308319229
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lillis, T. & Curry, M. J.
    (2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lillis, T. & Scott, M.
    (2007) Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), pp.5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Linell, P.
    (2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, N. A., & Hyland, K.
    (2021) International publishing as a networked activity: Collegial support for Chinese scientists. Applied Linguistics, 42(1), 164–185. 10.1093/applin/amz071
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz071 [Google Scholar]
  44. Luzón, M. J.
    (2018) Constructing academic identities online: Identity performance in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 331, 24–39. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Merga, M. K., Mason, S., & Morris, J. E.
    (2020) ‘What do I even call this?’ Challenges and possibilities of undertaking a thesis by publication. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1245–1261. 10.1080/0309877X.2019.1671964
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1671964 [Google Scholar]
  46. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J.
    (2018) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Newton, D. P.
    (2011) Teaching for understanding: What it is and how to do it. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203805411
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805411 [Google Scholar]
  48. Prior, P.
    (2003) Tracing process: How texts come into being. InC. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it (pp.173–206). Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (1998) Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203810651
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810651 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rabbi, S., & Canagarajah, A. S.
    (2017) Socialization in the neoliberal academy of STEM scholars: A case study of negotiating dispositions in an international graduate student in entomology. Humanities, 6(2), 39. 10.3390/h6020039
    https://doi.org/10.3390/h6020039 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ren, J.
    (2021) Variability and functions of lexical bundles in research articles of applied linguistics and pharmaceutical sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 501. 100968-. 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968 [Google Scholar]
  52. Samraj, B.
    (2002) Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 211, 1–17. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00023‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2005) An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for specific purposes, 24(2), 141–156. 10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sheldon, E.
    (2018) Dialogic spaces of knowledge construction in research article conclusion sections written by English L1, English L2, and Spanish L1 writers. Ibérica, 351, 13–40. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/133
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Simpson, S.
    (2013) Systems of writing response: A Brazilian student’s experiences writing for publication in an environmental sciences doctoral program. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(2), 228–249.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Street, B.
    (2003) What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Swales, J.
    (2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tardy, C. M.
    (2005) “It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 325–338. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2009) Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tardy, C. M., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J.
    (2020) Teaching and researching genre knowledge: Toward an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication, 37(3), 287–32. 10.1177/0741088320916554
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916554 [Google Scholar]
  62. Thompson, S.
    (1994) Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analysing lecture introductions. English for specific purposes, 13(2), 171–186. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90014‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90014-0 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00015.sha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00015.sha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): development; dispositions; practice; research article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error