Writing a book proposal

References

1. Bazerman, C.
   (1994) Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. InA. Freadman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp.79–101). Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Belcher, D.
   (2007) Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 161, 1–22. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001 [Google Scholar]
3. Belcher, D., Casanave, C. P., Hirvela, A., Sippell, K., & Vandrick, S.
   (2010, March23–28). Compiling and publishing an edited TESOL collection. TESOL 2010, Boston, MA.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Davidoff, F.
   (2004) Improving peer reviews: Who’s responsible?BMJ, 3281, 658–659. 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.657
   https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7441.657 [Google Scholar]
5. Demeter, M.
   (2020) Academic knowledge production and the Global South: Questioning inequality and under-representation. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52701‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52701-3 [Google Scholar]
6. Flowerdew, J.
   (2023) John Flowerdew’s essential bookshelf: English for research publication purposes (ERPP). Language Teaching, 1–11. 10.1017/S0261444823000071
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000071 [Google Scholar]
7. Flowerdew, J., & Habibie, P.
   (2022) Introducing English for research publication purposes. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gentil, G.
   (2022) On becoming a bilingual gatekeeper: The journey of a Francophone editor for an English language journal. InP. Habibie & A. K. Hultgren (Eds.), The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication (pp.63–81). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4_5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_5 [Google Scholar]
9. Germano, W.
   (2016) Getting it published: A guide for scholars and anyone else serious about serious books (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226281544.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226281544.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Habibie, P., & Burgess, S.
    (Eds.) (2021) Scholarly publication trajectories of early-career scholars: Insider perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑85784‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4 [Google Scholar]
11. Habibie, P., & Hultgren, A. K.
    (Eds.) (2022a) The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4 [Google Scholar]
12. Habibie, P., & A. K Hultgren, A. K.
    (2022b) Different faces of gatekeeping and gatekeepers. InP. Habibie & A. K. Hultgren (Eds.), The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication (pp.9–24). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_2 [Google Scholar]
13. Habibie, P., & Hyland, K.
    (Eds.) (2019) Novice writers and scholarly publication. Authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5 [Google Scholar]
14. Hartley, J.
    (2008) Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203927984
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927984 [Google Scholar]
15. Haynes, A.
    (2010) Writing successful academic books. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712081 [Google Scholar]
16. Hultgren, A. K.
    (2022) Certifying knowledge under neoliberalism: Global inequality and academic wellbeing. InP. Habibie & A. K. Hultgren (Eds.), The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication (pp.163–182). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_10 [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, K.
    (2015) Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hyland, K.
    (2022) Preface: Gatekeepers or facilitators?InP. Habibie & A. K. Hultgren (Eds.), The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication (pp.1–7). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_1 [Google Scholar]
19. Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M.
    (2018) The STM report. An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (5th ed). STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kwan, B.
    (2010) An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 38(1), 207–225. 10.1007/s10734‑009‑9233‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G. & Cronin, B.
    (2013) Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 641. 2–17. 10.1002/asi.22784
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784 [Google Scholar]
22. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J.
    (2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J.
    (2015) The politics of English, language and uptake. The case of international academic journal article reviews. AILA Review, 281, 127–150. 10.1075/aila.28.06lil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil [Google Scholar]
24. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J.
    (2022) The dynamics of academic knowledge production. Special issue: Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 3(1), 1–163.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Luey, B.
    (1995) Handbook for academic authors (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Luey, B.
    (2022) Handbook for academic authors (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009063876
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009063876 [Google Scholar]
27. Mrva-Montoya, A., Luca, E. J., & Boateng, H.
    (2019) Understanding Australian academic authors in the humanities and social sciences: Their publishing experiences, values, and perspectives. Journal of Scholarly Publishing51(1), 38–62. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/739130. 10.3138/jsp.51.1.03
    https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.1.03 [Google Scholar]
28. Mulligan, A., Hall, L. & Raphael, E.
    (2013) Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 641, 132–161. 10.1002/asi.22798
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798 [Google Scholar]
29. Paltridge, B.
    (1993) A challenge to the current concept of genre: Writing up research. PhD thesis, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Paltridge, B.
    (1997) Genre, frames and writing in research settings. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.45 [Google Scholar]
31. Paltridge, B.
    (2001) Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23749
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23749 [Google Scholar]
32. Paltridge, B.
    (2015) Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion?Studies in Higher Education, 401, 106–122. 10.1080/03075079.2013.818641
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818641 [Google Scholar]
33. Paltridge, B.
    (2017) The discourse of peer review: Reviewing submissions to academic journals. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑48736‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48736-0 [Google Scholar]
34. Paltridge, B., Harbon, L., Hirsh, D., Phakiti, A., Shen, H., Stevenson, M., & Woodrow, L.
    (2009) Teaching academic writing: An introduction for teachers of second language writers. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.300562
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.300562 [Google Scholar]
35. Paltridge, B., & Prior, M. T.
    (Eds.) (2024) The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and discourse. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
    (2007) Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. A handbook for supervisors. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203960813
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960813 [Google Scholar]
37. Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
    (2020) Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. A handbook for students and their supervisors (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
    (2024) Change and stability in thesis and dissertation writing: The evolution of an academic genre. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S. & Tardy, C. M.
    (2016) Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Portwood-Stacer, L.
    (2021) The book proposal book: A guide for scholarly authors. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sense about Science
    Sense about Science (2009) Peer review survey 2009: Full report. Available at: https://senseaboutscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Peer_Review_Survey.pdf (accessed4 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
42. Shaw, P., Phillips, A., & Gutiérrez, M. B.
    (2022) The death of the monograph?Publishing Research Quarterly, 381, 382–395. 10.1007/s12109‑022‑09885‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09885-2 [Google Scholar]
43. Swales, J. M.
    (1996) Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. InE. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp.45–58). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.41.06swa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.41.06swa [Google Scholar]
44. Swales, J. M.
    (2004) Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
45. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B.
    (2011) Navigating academia: Writing support genres. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.3073304
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.3073304 [Google Scholar]
46. Weller, A. C.
    (2001) Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. American Society for Information Science and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wellington, J.
    (2003) Getting published. A guide for lecturers and researchers. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]