1887
Volume 5, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Becoming a researcher not only involves the acts of contributing to the body of knowledge in a field but also constructing the image or identity of a researcher. Doctoral students who aim for positions within academia upon graduation see doctoral education as a phase in which they develop their research and publication skills. An existing body of literature in the field of writing has explored doctoral students’ experiences in research and publication focusing on the role of the external factors, such as mentoring, resource accessibility, issue of authority, and so on. Other studies have explored how various experiences facilitate or inhibit the development of research skills. However, less attention has been paid to the role of internal motivators or intrinsic factors in doctoral writing and how these factors relate to research work and research productivity. Using a narrative approach, this study explores the experiences of four doctoral students in developing a researcher identity, focusing on the challenges that they face, and the role of the doctoral program in shaping their researcher identity. This study offers insights into doctoral students’ training and advising by illustrating how research productivity can be enhanced at the doctoral level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00018.nou
2025-01-17
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, C., & Pare, A.
    (2012) Writing as craft and practice in the doctoral curriculum. InA. Lee, & S. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education (pp.12–25). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamberg, M.
    (2011) Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3–24. 10.1177/0959354309355852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309355852 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barkhuizen, G.
    (2015) Narrative knowledging in second language teaching and learning contexts. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of narrative analysis (pp.97–115). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Belcher, D.
    (1994) The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 23–34. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90022‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90022-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke, P. J.
    (2003) Relationships among multiple identities. InP. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoit (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp.195–214). Kluwer Academic/Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑9188‑1_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9188-1_14 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A.
    (2007) Understanding the science experiences of women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. 10.1002/tea.20237
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237 [Google Scholar]
  7. Casanave, C. P.
    (2019) Performing expertise in doctoral dissertations: Thoughts on a fundamental dilemma facing doctoral students and their supervisors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 271, 57–62. 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caskey, M. M., Stevens, D. D., & Yeo, M.
    (2020) Examining doctoral student development of a researcher identity: Using the draw a researcher test. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 5(1), 16–26. 10.5195/ie.2020.92
    https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.92 [Google Scholar]
  9. Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Corcelles, M.
    (2013) Learning to write a research article: Ph. D. students’ transitions toward disciplinary writing regulation. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(4), 442-477. 10.58680/rte201323634
    https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201323634 [Google Scholar]
  10. Castelló, M., Kobayashi, S., McGinn, M. K., Pechar, H., Vekkaila, J., & Wisker, G.
    (2015) Researcher identity in transition: Signals to identify and manage spheres of activity in a risk-career. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 39–54. 10.14786/flr.v3i3.149
    https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.149 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, S.
    (2014) Balancing knowing and not-knowing: An exploration of doctoral candidate’s performance of researcher selves in the dissertation defence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 364–379. 10.1080/02602938.2013.834876
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.834876 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.
    (2004) Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cotterall, S.
    (2011) Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy?. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413–425. 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560381 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2015) The rich get richer: International doctoral candidates and scholarly identity. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 360–370. 10.1080/14703297.2013.839124
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.839124 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crusan, D. J.
    (2017) Fake it ’til you make it: The imposter syndrome -The dilemma of (women) academics. InP. K. Matsuda, S. E. Snyder, & K. D. O’Meara (Eds.), Professionalizing second language writing (pp.90–110). Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T.
    (2004) Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663–688. 10.2307/3588284
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588284 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dunlap, J. C.
    (2006) The effect of a problem-centered, enculturating experience on doctoral students’ self-efficacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2), 19–48. 10.7771/1541‑5015.1025
    https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1025 [Google Scholar]
  18. Englander, K.
    (2009) Transformation of the identities of nonnative English-speaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8(1), 35–53. 10.1080/15348450802619979
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450802619979 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ennals, P., Fortune, T., Williams, A., & D’Cruz, K.
    (2016) Shifting occupational identity: Doing, being, becoming and belonging in the academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 433–446. 10.1080/07294360.2015.1107884
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1107884 [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission
    European Commission (2011) Toward a European framework for research careers. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation. ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communication_en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fazel, I.
    (2021) Socialization into scholarly publication as a multilingual, early-career scholar. InP. Habibie & S. Burgess (Eds.), Scholarly publication trajectories of early-career scholars (pp.189–205). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gardner, S. K., & Holley, K. A.
    (2011) “Those invisible barriers are real”: The progression of first-generation students through doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education44(1), 77–92. 10.1080/10665684.2011.529791
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.529791 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibson, W., & Brown, A.
    (2009) Working with qualitative data. Sage. 10.4135/9780857029041
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029041 [Google Scholar]
  24. Golde, C. M.
    (1998) Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. New Directions for Higher Education, 1998(101), 55–64. 10.1002/he.10105
    https://doi.org/10.1002/he.10105 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2005) The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700. 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304 [Google Scholar]
  26. Habibie, P.
    (2016) Writing for scholarly publication in a Canadian higher education context: A case study. InC. M. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp.51–67). Brill Publishing. 10.1163/9789004304338_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_004 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2019) To be native or not to be native: That is not the question. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp.35–52). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Habibie, P., & Kohls, R.
    (Eds.) (2024) Narratives and practices of mentorship in scholarly publication. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003274131
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003274131 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hall, L. A., & Burns, L. D.
    (2009) Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49–70. 10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345 [Google Scholar]
  30. Harrison, J. E.
    (2009) Developing a doctoral identity: A narrative study in an autoethnographic frame (Doctoral dissertation). University of KwaZulu. Research Space. hdl.handle.net/10413/767
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jazvac-Martek, M.
    (2009) Oscillating role identities: The academic experiences of education doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 253–264. 10.1080/14703290903068862
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903068862 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jazvac-Martek, M., Chen, S., & McAlpine, L.
    (2011) Tracking doctoral student experience over time: Cultivating agency in diverse spaces. InL. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp.17–36). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kehm, B. M.
    (2004) Developing doctoral degrees and qualifications in Europe: Good practice and issues of concern–A comparative analysis. InJ. Sadlek (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and prospects (pp.279–298). CEPES-UNESCO.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kennedy, L. M.
    (2020) Confessions of a novice researcher: An autoethnography of inherent vulnerabilities. The Qualitative Report, 25(6), 1526–1539. 10.46743/2160‑3715/2020.4263
    https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4263 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim, K., & Karau, S. J.
    (2009) Working environment and the research productivity of doctoral students in management. Journal of Education for Business, 85(2), 101–106. 10.1080/08832320903258535
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903258535 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kobayashi, M., Zappa-Hollman, S., & Duff, P. A.
    (2017) Academic discourse socialization. InP. Duff & S. May (Eds.), Language socialization, encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed.) (pp.239–254). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lopes, B., & Lourenço, M.
    (2019) Unveiling ‘European’ and ‘International’ researcher identities: A case study with doctoral students in the humanities and social sciences. Social Sciences, 8(11), 303. 10.3390/socsci8110303
    https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110303 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mantai, L.
    (2017) Feeling like a researcher: Experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 636–650. 10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603 [Google Scholar]
  40. Matsuda, P. K.
    (2016) The will to build: Mentoring doctoral students in second language writing. InK. McIntosh, C. Pelaez-Morales, & T. Silva (Eds). Graduate studies in second language writing (pp.93–110). Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. McAlpine, L.
    (2012) Identity trajectories: Doctoral journeys from past to present to future. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 38–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N.
    (2009) Doctoral student experience in Education: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1), 97–110. 10.1108/1759751X201100007
    https://doi.org/10.1108/1759751X201100007 [Google Scholar]
  43. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M.
    (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mur-Dueñas, P.
    (2019) The experience of a NNES outer circle novice scholar in scholarly publication. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication. Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp.97–115). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Paré, A., McAlpine, L., & Starke-Meyerring, D.
    (2006, April). Entering the text: Learning doctoral rhetoric. Inannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Prior, P. A.
    (1998) Writing/Disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Riessman, C. K.
    (2008) Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S.
    (2012) Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Saldaña, J.
    (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A.
    (2005) Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. 10.3102/0013189X034004014
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014 [Google Scholar]
  51. Shvidko, E., & Atkinson, D.
    (2019) From student to scholar: Making the leap to writing for publication. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication. Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp.155–177). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_9 [Google Scholar]
  52. Simpson, S.
    (2012) The problem of graduate-level writing support: Building a cross-campus graduate writing initiative. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 95–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sinclair, J., Barnacle, R., & Cuthbert, D.
    (2014) How the doctorate contributes to the formation of active researchers: What the research tells us. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1972–1986. 10.1080/03075079.2013.806460
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806460 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tardy, C.
    (2004) The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 247–269. 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tonso, K. L.
    (2006) Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 273–307. 10.1007/s11422‑005‑9009‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2 [Google Scholar]
  56. Turner, G., & McAlpine, L.
    (2011) Doctoral experience as researcher preparation: Activities, passion, status. International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(1), 46–60. 10.1108/17597511111178014
    https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511111178014 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wenger, E.
    (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00018.nou
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error