1887
Volume 5, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication

 
€ 99.99€ 99.99€ 85.59978-3-031-06518-7

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00020.boc
2025-01-17
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Holman Jones, S.
    (2017) Autoethnography. InC. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp.1–11). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bocanegra-Valle, A.
    (2013) The perceived value of English for academic publishing among ESP multilingual scholars in Europe. ESP Today. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 1(1), 5–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2014) ‘English is my default academic language’: Voices from LSP scholars publishing in a multilingual journal. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13(1), 65–77. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis, C.
    (2007) Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. 10.1177/1077800406294947
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947 [Google Scholar]
  5. Guillén-Galve, I., & Bocanegra-Valle, A.
    (Eds.) (2021) Ethnographies of academic writing research: Theory, methods, and interpretation. John Benjamins. 10.1075/rmal.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Habibie, P., & Burgess, S.
    (Eds.) (2021) Scholarly publication trajectories of early-career scholars: Insider perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑85784‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
    (2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Méndez, M.
    (2013) Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279–287. 10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09
    https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09 [Google Scholar]
  9. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M.
    (2016) Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Starfield, S.
    (2013) Researcher reflexivity. InC. Chapelle (Ed.). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.4931–4937). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tullis, J. A.
    (2013) Self and others: Ethics in autoethnographic research. InS. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp.244–261). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315427812.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315427812.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  12. Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D.
    (2019) Academics writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429197994
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429197994 [Google Scholar]
  13. Wall, S.
    (2008) Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53. 10.1177/160940690800700103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00020.boc
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error