1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Unequal access to resources for publication for Global South scholars is decidedly real when we consider issues of epistemic injustice encountered by them (Higgins, 2024). The emergence of Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) may seem like a panacea for addressing this social injustice. However, ongoing material challenges (e.g., limited access to digital media and AI tools) prevent Global South scholars from fully exploiting AI-generated writing (Dobinson et al., 2024; Warschauer et al., 2023). Against this fraught backdrop, we situate our Indonesia-based case study within a decolonial perspective, centering two Indonesian scholars who have attended GenAI workshops on writing for publication. Through thematic analysis, triangulating data from interviews, artifacts, member checking, and peer debriefing, we explore how they negotiated the learning and application of GenAI tools. Our findings reveal that while workshops were generally helpful, the participants faced challenges such as structural inequities in research resources and accessibility, English and discursive challenges, and written voices and academic integrity. From an English for research publication purposes (ERPP) perspective, these findings suggest that GenAI alone will not be able to level the proverbial publication playing field; instead, Global South scholars require mentorship and guidance in navigating the complex publishing process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00036.hen
2026-03-12
2026-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnawi, O. Z., & R’boul, H.
    (2023) Colonizability and hermeneutical injustice in applied linguistics research:(Im) possibilities for epistemological delinking. Applied Linguistics, 44(5), 865–881. 10.1093/applin/amad047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad047 [Google Scholar]
  2. Belcher, D.
    (2024) The promising and problematic potential of generative AI as a leveler of the publishing playing field. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 5(1–2), 93–105. 10.1075/jerpp.00025.bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.00025.bel [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 31, 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  4. Darvin, R.
    (2021) The tools we choose: A critical perspective of technologies that mediate scholarly practices. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 2(1). 10.1075/jerpp.21001.dar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21001.dar [Google Scholar]
  5. De Costa, P. I., Li, W., & Rawal, H.
    (2019) Qualitative classroom methods. InJ. W. Schweiter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp.111–136). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333603.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.006 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Fina, A., Oostendorp, M., & Ortega, L.
    (2023) Sketches toward a decolonial applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 44(5), 819–832. 10.1093/applin/amad059
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad059 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dobinson, T. J., Chen, J., & Steele, C.
    (2024) Decolonizing or recolonizing? AI through the eyes of applied linguists, language teachers, and language learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(3), 253–258. 10.1075/aral.24146.dob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24146.dob [Google Scholar]
  8. Duff, P.
    (2008) Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gentil, G.
    (2022) On becoming a bilingual gatekeeper: The journey of a Francophone editor for an English-language journal. InP. Habibie & A. K. Hultgren (Eds.), The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication (pp.63–81). Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Habibie, P.
    (2022) Writing for scholarly publication in an interconnected disjunctured world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 581, 100933. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100933
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100933 [Google Scholar]
  11. Habibie, P., & Starfield, S.
    (2023) AI-mediated English for research publication purposes: Are we there yet?. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 4(1), 1–4. 10.1075/jerpp.00013.hab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.00013.hab [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamid, M. O., Sultana, S., & Roshid, M. M.
    (2024) Transformation of applied linguistics in the Global South context of Bangladesh: Researcher agency, imagination, and North-South cooperation. Applied Linguistics, amae037. 10.1093/applin/amae037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae037 [Google Scholar]
  13. Higgins, C.
    (2024) Toward un-WEIRDing academic publishing about language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2024(289–290), 27–31. 10.1515/ijsl‑2024‑0073
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2024-0073 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hyland, K.
    (2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 311, 58–69. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia
    Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia (2024) Panduan penggunaan generative artificial intellegence pada pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi [Guidelines for using generative artificial intelligence in teaching and learning in higher education]. Retrieved fromhttps://kemdiktisaintek.go.id/epustaka/122191/
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, N., Cheung, M. M., Lee, V., & De Costa, P.
    (2025) Centering critical digital literacy in the lives of language teaching professionals: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration. System, 103930. 10.1016/j.system.2025.103930
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103930 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kubota, R.
    (2020) Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 712–732. 10.1093/applin/amz033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuteeva, M.
    (2023) Knowledge flows and languages of publication: English as a bridge and a fence in international knowledge exchanges. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 4(1), 80–96. 10.1075/jerpp.22008.kut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.22008.kut [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuteeva, M., & Andersson, M.
    (2024) Diversity and standards in writing for publication in the age of AI — Between a rock and a hard place. Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 561–567. 10.1093/applin/amae025
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae025 [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, W., & De Costa, P. I.
    (2021) Problematizing enterprise culture in global academic publishing: Linguistic entrepreneurship through the lens of two Chinese visiting scholars in a U.S. university. Multilingua, 40(2), 225–250. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0036 [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J.
    (2020) Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes, 591, 29–41. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R.
    (2006) Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19–35. 10.1080/07294360500453053
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mendoza, A., Oropeza, V., Rodríguez, D., Sobrevilla, Z., & Martínez, J.
    (2021) Challenges, feelings, and attitudes towards writing in ERPP in semi-periphery countries: The case of Mexican graduate students. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 2(2), 129–159. 10.1075/jerpp.21008.men
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21008.men [Google Scholar]
  24. Pack, A., & Maloney, J.
    (2023) Using generative artificial intelligence for language education research: Insights from using OpenAI’s ChatGPT. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1571–1582. 10.1002/tesq.3253
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3253 [Google Scholar]
  25. Patel, V., & Kim, Y. R.
    (2007) Contribution of low-and middle-income countries to research published in leading general psychiatry journals, 2002–2004. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(1), 77–78. 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025692
    https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025692 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rojo, L.
    (2021) Hegemonies and inequalities in academia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267–268), 169–192. 10.1515/ijsl‑2020‑0077
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0077 [Google Scholar]
  27. Saldana, J.
    (2021) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Soler, J.
    (2021) Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English: Limitations and ways forward in the debate. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 2(2), 160–171. 10.1075/jerpp.21002.sol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21002.sol [Google Scholar]
  29. Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T.
    (2023) The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 621, 101071. 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 [Google Scholar]
  30. Zheng, Y., & Guo, X.
    (2019) Publishing in and about English: Challenges and opportunities of Chinese multilingual scholars’ language practices in academic publishing. Language Policy, 18(1), 107–130. 10.1007/s10993‑018‑9464‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9464-8 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00036.hen
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.00036.hen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error