Nature of disciplinarity

References

1. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R.
   (2001) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Society for Research into Higher Education Research and Open Press University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bernstein, B.
   (1999) Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. 10.1080/01425699995380
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380 [Google Scholar]
3. Bernstein, B.
   (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowan & Littlefield.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biglan, A.
   (1973a) The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. 10.1037/h0034701
   https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701 [Google Scholar]
5. Biglan, A.
   (1973b) Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure of output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213. 10.1037/h0034699
   https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034699 [Google Scholar]
6. Bolton, K., & Lam, A. S. L.
   (2006) Applied linguistics in China. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp.350–356). Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00603‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00603-9 [Google Scholar]
7. Cheng, A.
   (2018) Genre and graduate-level research writing. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.9558175
   https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9558175 [Google Scholar]
8. Cheng, A.
   (2019) Examining the “applied aspirations” in the ESP genre analysis of published journal articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 36–47. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.005 [Google Scholar]
9. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S.
   (2017) A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90–106. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
10. de Bot, K.
    (2006) Applied in Europe. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp.356–362). Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00604‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00604-0 [Google Scholar]
11. Dogan, M., & Pahre, R.
    (1990) Fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences. Studies in Comparative International Development, 24(2), 56–73. 10.1007/BF02687172
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687172 [Google Scholar]
12. Donald, J.
    (2002) Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Getz, D.
    (2002) Event studies and event management: On becoming an academic discipline. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 9, 12–23.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gao, Y., Li, L., & Lü, J.
    (2001) Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 1–4. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00015‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00015-0 [Google Scholar]
15. Goes, P. B.
    (2014) Editor’s comments: Design science research in top information systems journals. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), iii–viii.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grabe, W.
    (2010) Applied linguistics: A twenty-first-century discipline. InR. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics and linguistics (2nd ed., pp.34–44). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195384253.013.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195384253.013.0002 [Google Scholar]
17. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B.
    (2006) Applied linguistics in North America. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp.363–369). Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00605‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00605-2 [Google Scholar]
18. Graves, H., Moghaddasi, S., & Hashim, A.
    (2014) “Let G ¼ (V, E) be a graph”: Turning the abstract into the tangible in introductions in mathematics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 1–11. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.03.004 [Google Scholar]
19. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A.
    (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37, 337–355. 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01
    https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01 [Google Scholar]
20. Harland, C. M., Lamming, R. C. H., & Walker,
    (2006) Supply management: Is it a discipline?International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 730–753. 10.1108/01443570610672211
    https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672211 [Google Scholar]
21. Hatherell, W., & Bartlett, J.
    (2005) Positioning public relations as an academic discipline in Australia. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(2), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Higgins, S.
    (2001) Digital curation: The emergence of a new discipline. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 78–88. 10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
    https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191 [Google Scholar]
23. Hu, G., & Cao, F.
    (2015) Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12–25. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002 [Google Scholar]
24. Hyland, K.
    (2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hyland, K.
    (2002) Specificity revisited: How far should we go now?English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385–395. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(01)00028‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X [Google Scholar]
26. Hyland, K.
    (2004) Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23927
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927 [Google Scholar]
27. Hyon, S.
    (2018) Introducing genre and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Junghans, A., & Olsson, N. O. E.
    (2014) Discussion of facilities management as an academic discipline. Facilities, 32, 67–79. 10.1108/F‑10‑2012‑0078
    https://doi.org/10.1108/F-10-2012-0078 [Google Scholar]
29. King, J. L., & Lyytinen, K.
    (Eds.) (2006) Information systems: The state of the field. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Krishnan, A.
    (2009) What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. NCRM Working Paper Series 03/09. University of Southampton.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kuhn, T. S.
    (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
32. Kuteeva, M., & Negretti, R.
    (2016) Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 41, 36–49. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.004 [Google Scholar]
33. Kuteeva, M., & McGrath, L.
    (2015) The theoretical research article as a reflection of disciplinary practices: The case of pure mathematics. Applied Linguistics, 36, 215–235. 10.1093/applin/amt042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt042 [Google Scholar]
34. Kwan, B. S. C.
    (2017) A cross-paradigm macro-structural analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 14–30. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.002 [Google Scholar]
35. Kwan, B. S. C., & Chan, H.
    (2014) An investigation of source use in the Results and the closing sections of empirical articles in Information Systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 29–47. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.004 [Google Scholar]
36. Kwan, B. S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C. K. C.
    (2012) Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 188–201. 10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
37. Lewis, J., & Bartlett, N.
    (2013) Inscribing a discipline: Tensions in the field of bioinformatics. New Genetics and Society, 32, 243–263. 10.1080/14636778.2013.773172
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.773172 [Google Scholar]
38. Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I.
    (2013) Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94, 589–593. 10.1007/s11192‑012‑0784‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0784-8 [Google Scholar]
39. Louçã, F.
    (2007) The years of high econometrics: A short history of the generation that reinvented economics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lowenstein, A.
    (2004) Gerontology coming of age: The transformation of social gerontology into a distinct academic discipline. Educational Gerontology, 30, 129–141. 10.1080/03601270490266293
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270490266293 [Google Scholar]
41. Matusall, S., Kaufmann, I. M., & Christen, M.
    (2015) The emergence of social neuroscience. InJ. Decety & J. T. Caciopo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp.9–27). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F., & Budgell, B.
    (2019) “It is important to reinforce the importance of ”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 139–151. 10.1016/j.esp.2019.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.02.004 [Google Scholar]
43. Moghadassi, S., & Graves, H. A. B.
    (2017) “Since Hadwiger’s conjection…is still open”: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 69–85. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.003 [Google Scholar]
44. Moghaddasi, S., Graves, H. A. B., Graves, R., & Gutierrez, X.
    (2019) “See Figure 1”: Visual moves in discrete mathematics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 56, 50–67. 10.1016/j.esp.2019.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.08.001 [Google Scholar]
45. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I.
    (2003) Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research Areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1237–1249. 10.1002/asi.10326
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326 [Google Scholar]
46. Österle, H., Becker, U., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A., & Sinz, E. J.
    (2011) Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 7–10. 10.1057/ejis.2010.55
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.55 [Google Scholar]
47. Posteguillo, S.
    (1999) The schematic structure of Computer Science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 139–160. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00001‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5 [Google Scholar]
48. Siemens, G.
    (2013) Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1380–1400. 10.1177/0002764213498851
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851 [Google Scholar]
49. Stichweh, R.
    (1992) The sociology of scientific disciplines: On the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science. Science in Context, 5(1), 3–15. 10.1017/S0269889700001071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700001071 [Google Scholar]
50. Stichweh, R.
    (2001) History of scientific disciplines. InJ. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 20 (pp.13727–13731). Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/03187‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03187-9 [Google Scholar]
51. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Trowler, P. R.
    (2012) Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: Conceptual groundwork. InP. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and territories in the 21st century (pp.5–29). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Trowler, P. R.
    (2014) Depicting and researching disciplines: Strong and moderate essentialist approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1720–1731. 10.1080/03075079.2013.801431
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801431 [Google Scholar]
54. Weingart, P.
    (2003) Growth, differentiation, expansion and change of identity – The future of science. InB. Joerges & H. Nowotny (Eds.), Social studies of science and technology: Looking back, ahead (pp.183–200). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0185‑4_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_9 [Google Scholar]
55. Weingart, P., & Stehr, N.
    (2000) Practising interdisciplinarity. University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Westin, S., Matthew, R., & Kim, C. K.
    (1994) Cross-fertilization of knowledge: The case of MIS and its reference disciplines. Information Resources Management Journal, 7, 24–34. 10.4018/irmj.1994040103
    https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.1994040103 [Google Scholar]