1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Internationally, most prestigious and influential academic journals are published in English, and therefore a mastery of the language is necessary to ensure engagement with the international scientific community. There is debate in the literature as to whether the dominance of English might lead to the marginalization of contributions from academics for whom English is a second language. The present study explores through interviews the insights of 11 humanities and social sciences academics working at two Japanese universities ranked in the top 50 globally. The findings indicate that most of the participants view English as the logical vehicle for reaching a wider audience for their research. Despite an acknowledgement that publishing in English presents problems from both linguistic and pragmatic perspectives, these academics do not, on the whole, believe that current standards need to be revisited. These issues are discussed in light of the changing realities of academic environments, and the need to ensure accessible pathways for those who can and should be contributing to knowledge construction in the global academy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.22009.str
2023-07-20
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arimoto, A., Daizen, T., & Huang, F.
    (2021) Changing policies of research, development and innovation and the characteristics of academics in Japan. InT. Aarrevaara (Ed.), Universities in the knowledge society, (pp.123–143). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑76579‑8_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76579-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M.
    (2000) Literacy practices. InD. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič, (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp.7–15). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Belcher, D., & Yang, H. S.
    (2020) Global perspectives on linguacultural variation in academic publishing. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 1(1), 28–50. 10.1075/jerpp.19009.bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.19009.bel [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S.
    (2015) InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Canagarajah, S., & Lee, E.
    (2014) Negotiating alternative discourses in academic writing and publishing: Risks with hybridity. InL. Thesen & L. Cooper (Eds.), Risk in academic writing: Postgraduate students, their teachers and the making of knowledge (pp.59–99). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Corcoran, J.
    (2019) Addressing the “bias gap”: A research driven argument for critical support of plurilingual scientists research writing. Written Communication, 36(4), 538–577. 10.1177/0741088319861648
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319861648 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crystal, D.
    (2003) English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486999
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999 [Google Scholar]
  8. Curry, M., & Lillis, T.
    (2014) Strategies and tactics in academic knowledge production by multilingual scholars. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22 (32), 1–23. 10.14507/epaa.v22n32.2014
    https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n32.2014 [Google Scholar]
  9. Education First [Google Scholar]
  10. Flowerdew, J.
    (2019) The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 521, 249–260. 10.1017/S0261444819000041
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041 [Google Scholar]
  11. Garfield, E.
    (1996) What is the primordial reference for the phrase “publish or perish”?The Scientist, 10(12), 11–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gee, J.
    (1989) Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education171(1), 5–17. 10.1177/002205748917100101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748917100101 [Google Scholar]
  13. Habibie, P., & Starfield, S.
    (2020) Editorial. Visions and direction. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 1 (1), 1–3. 10.1075/jerpp.00001.edi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.00001.edi [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanauer, D., Sheridan, C., & Englander, K.
    (2019) Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican researchers. Written Communication, 36(1), 136–154. 10.1177/0741088318804821
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804821 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyland, K.
    (2009) English for professional academic purposes: Writing for scholarly publication. InD. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice (pp.83–105). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2013) Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching46(1), 53–70. 10.1017/S0261444811000036
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 311, 58–69. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hynninen, N. & Kuteeva, M.
    (2017) “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 301, 53 – 65. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ishikawa, M.
    (2014) Ranking regime and the future of vernacular scholarship. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22 (30), 1 – 27. 10.14507/epaa.v22n30.2014
    https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n30.2014 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ishikawa, M., & Sun, C.
    (2016) The paradox of autonomy: Japan’s vernacular scholarship and the policy pursuit of “super global”. Higher Education Policy, 291, 451 – 472. 10.1057/s41307‑016‑0014‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0014-8 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jenkins, J.
    (2015) Global Englishes. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kachru, B. B.
    (1985) Standard, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. InR. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.) English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, (pp.11–30). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. King, N., & Horrocks, C.
    (2010) Interviews in qualitative research. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lea, M., & Street, B.
    (1998) Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. 10.1080/03075079812331380364
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2006) The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications, Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lillis, T., & Curry, M.
    (2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. 10.1177/0741088305283754
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305283754 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2015) The politics of English, language and uptake: The case of international academic journal article reviews. AILA Review, 281, 127–150. 10.1075/aila.28.06lil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil [Google Scholar]
  29. Luo, N. & Hyland, K.
    (2021) International publishing is a networked activity: Collegial support for Chinese scientists. Applied Linguistics, 42 (1), 164 – 185. 10.1093/applin/amz071
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz071 [Google Scholar]
  30. Manalo, E.
    (2022) Conducting international collaborative research: How to overcome common hurdles and set up for success. Information and Technology in Education and Learning, 2 (1), Inv-p002. 10.12937/itel.2.1.Inv.p002
    https://doi.org/10.12937/itel.2.1.Inv.p002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mauranen, A., & Ranta, E.
    (Eds.) (2009) English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N., & Ranta, E.
    (2016) English as the academic lingua franca. InK. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, (pp.44–55). Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McDowell, L., & Liardét, C.
    (2019) Japanese materials scientists' experiences with English for research publication purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes371, 141-153. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.011 [Google Scholar]
  34. McFarlane, B.
    (2017) The paradox of collaboration: A moral continuum. Higher Education Research & Development, 36 (3), 472–485. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1288707
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1288707 [Google Scholar]
  35. McGrail, M., Rickard, C., & Jones, R.
    (2006) Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates, Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19–35. 10.1080/07294360500453053
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053 [Google Scholar]
  36. McKinley, J., & Rose, H.
    (2018) Conceptualisations of language errors, standards, norms and nativeness in English for research publication purposes: An analysis of journal submission guidelines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 421, 1 – 11. 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Merriam, S.
    (2009) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Paltridge, B.
    (2017) The discourse of peer review: Reviewing submissions to academic journals. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑48736‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48736-0 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pienimäki, H.
    (2021) Language professionals as regulators of academic discourse [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M., & Berkson, K.
    (2016) Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 341, 3–8. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rozycki, W., & Johnson, N.
    (2013) Non-canonical grammar in best paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 321, 157–169. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Salō, L.
    (2017) The sociolinguistics of academic publishing: Language and the practices of homo academicus: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑58940‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58940-4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Seargeant, P.
    (2020) English in Japan. InK. Bolton, W. Botha, & A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), The Handbook of Asian Englishes (pp.569 – 584). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118791882.ch24
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791882.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sheridan, C.
    (2015) National journals and centering institutions: A historiography of an English language teaching journal in Taiwan. English for Specific Purposes, 70–84. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Shiroza, S.
    (2021) Where does WE fit? Theoretical and practical considerations in integrating the world Englishes paradigm into Japanese higher education. English Literature & Language, 571, 59 – 84.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Soler, J.
    (2022) Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English: Limitations and ways forward in the debate. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 2 (2), 160 – 171. 10.1075/jerpp.21002.sol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21002.sol [Google Scholar]
  47. Solin, A., & Hynninen, N.
    (2018) Regulating the language of research writing: Disciplinary and institutional mechanisms. Language and Education, 32(6), 494–510. 10.1080/09500782.2018.1511727
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1511727 [Google Scholar]
  48. Strauss, P.
    (2019) Shakespeare and the English poets: The influence of native speaking English reviewers on the acceptance of journal articles. Publications, 71, 201. 10.3390/publications7010020
    https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010020 [Google Scholar]
  49. Street, B.
    (2006) Autonomous and ideological models of literacy: Approaches from new literacy studies. EASA Media Anthropology Network E-Seminar91. www.philbu.net/mediaanthropology/street_newliteracy.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sutton, P.
    (2017) Lost souls? The demoralisation of academic labour in the measured university. Higher Education Research & Development, 36 (3), 625–636. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1289365
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1289365 [Google Scholar]
  51. Teichler, U.
    (2019) The academics and their institutional environment in Japan – A view from outside, Contemporary Japan, 31(2), 234–263. 10.1080/18692729.2019.1586295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2019.1586295 [Google Scholar]
  52. Yano, Y.
    (2011) English as an international language and ‘Japanese English’. InP. Seargeant (Ed.), English in Japan in the era of globalisation, (pp.125 – 142). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230306196_7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306196_7 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.22009.str
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.22009.str
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error