1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of editorial peer review is to maintain and improve academic journal quality while its execution depends on journal status and location in the global academic publishing system. Significant research on authors’ publishing experiences has been conducted in ERPP. However, empirical research on the perspectives of multilingual editors beyond the Anglophone center of scholarly publishing is an under-researched area. Therefore, to better understand editors’ challenges and roles and investigate pedagogical activity at journals in the “semi-periphery,” five English-medium national journals in Taiwan were investigated. Data from qualitative interviews with five editors were triangulated with journal and database data. A taxonomy of editor challenges and roles along journal development stages is presented. Results show that the type and intensity of editors’ challenges shift with publication development. Oversight entities imposing Anglophone center norms have standardized peer review practices enabling journal mobility. However, collisions between those mechanisms and journal conditions can frustrate editors and limit their ability to follow the standards, let alone execute explicit pedagogical activities. This study reveals the complicated terrain for editors beyond the Anglophone center and provides insights into the intersection of journal development and editor roles cultivated through movement along the global academic continuum toward mobility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25006.she
2025-12-04
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abusalim, A.
    (2021) ERPP practices in the Arab world: One language, different problems. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 2(1), 30–61. 10.1075/jerpp.20003.abu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.20003.abu [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson, J., & Fujimoto-Adamson, N.
    (2015) “I was in their shoes”: Shifting Perceptions of Editorial Roles and Responsibilities. English Scholarship Beyond Borders, 1(1), 109–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2016) Sustaining Reviewing Quality: Induction, Mentoring, and Community. English Scholarship Beyond Borders, 2(1), 29–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Adamson, J., & Muller, T.
    (2012) Editorial investigation of roles and responsibilities in academic journal editorial systems. InJ. L . Adamson & R. Nunn (Eds.), Editorial and authorial voices in EFL academic journal publishing (pp.123–169). Asian EFL Journal Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Adamson, J., Muller, T., Martins, C., Hann, N., & Nunn, R. C.
    (2021) Journal editors’ perceptions of academic publishing outside major publishing house. English Scholarship Beyond Borders, 7(2), 59–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bal, M.
    (2018) Let’s Abolish the Peer-Review System. Media Theory. RetrievedSeptember 12,2018, frommediatheoryjournal.org/mieke-bal-lets-abolish-the-peer-review-system/#comments
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Belcher, D. D.
    (2007) Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 161, 1–12. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett, K.
    (2014) Introduction: The political and economic infrastructure of academic practice: The ‘semiperiphery’ as a category for social and linguistic analysis. InK. Bennett (Ed.), The semiperiphery of academic writing: discourses, communities and practices (pp.1–9). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137351197_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351197_1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, J.
    (2010) The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  10. Braine, G.
    (2003) Negotiating the gatekeepers: The journey of an academic article. InC. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes in Language Education (pp.73–90). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Canagarajah, A. S.
    (2002) The geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c [Google Scholar]
  12. Chou, C. P.
    (Ed.) (2014a) The SSCI syndrome in higher education: A local or global phenomenon. Sense Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑6209‑407‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2014b) The SSCI Syndrome in Taiwan’s Academia. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(29), 1–18. 10.14507/epaa.v22n29.2014
    https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n29.2014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Consortium, P. R. [Google Scholar]
  15. Corcoran, J.
    (2019) Addressing the “Bias Gap”: A Research-Driven Argument for Critical Support of Plurilingual Scientists’ Research Writing. Written Communication, 36(4), 538–577. 10.1177/0741088319861648
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319861648 [Google Scholar]
  16. Deji, O. F.
    (2012) Gender and rural development (Vol. 2: Advanced studies). Lit verlag GmbH & Co. KG Wien.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Donovan, S. K.
    (2011) Big journals, small journals, and the two peer reviews. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(4), 534–538. search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=61309749&site=ehost-live. 10.3138/jsp.42.4.534
    https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.42.4.534 [Google Scholar]
  18. Englander, K., & Uzuner-Smith, S.
    (2013) The role of policy in constructing the peripheral scientist in the era of globalization. Language Policy, 121, 231–250. 10.1007/s10993‑012‑9268‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9268-1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Flowerdew, J., & Habibe, P.
    (2022) Introducing English for research and publication purposes. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibbs, W. W.
    (1995) Lost science in the Third World [Article]. Scientific American, 273(2), 92. 10.1038/scientificamerican0895‑92
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0895-92 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonzales, L. D., & Núñez, A.-M.
    (2014) The Ranking Regime and the Production of Knowledge: Implications for Academia [Article]. Regime de Classificação e produção de conhecimento: implicações para a Universidade, 22(26/34), 1–20. 10.14507/epaa.v22n31.2014
    https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n31.2014 [Google Scholar]
  22. Habibe, P.
    (2019) To be Native or Not to be Native: That is Not the Question. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp.39–52). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Habibe, P., & Hultgren, A. K.
    (Eds.) (2022) The inner world of gatkeeping in scholarly publishing. Palgrave Macmillan. 978‑3‑031‑06519‑4 (eBook).
    https://doi.org/978-3-031-06519-4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanauer, D. I., & Englander, K.
    (2013) Scientific writing in a second language. Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hochschild, A. R.
    (1979) Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. 10.1086/227049
    https://doi.org/10.1086/227049 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyland, K.
    (2022) The scholarly publishing landscape. InM. Z. C. Hanganu-Bresch, G. Cutrufello, & S. Maci (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication (pp.15–25). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003043782‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043782-10 [Google Scholar]
  27. Josephs, K. B.
    (2016) Handling with care: On editing, invisibility, and affective labor. Small axe: a journal of criticism, 20(2), 98–105. 10.1215/07990537‑3626824
    https://doi.org/10.1215/07990537-3626824 [Google Scholar]
  28. Labassi, T.
    (2009) Periphery non-Anglophone scholarship in English-only journals: Conditions of a better visibility. Changing English, 16(2), 247–254. 10.1080/13586840902863236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13586840902863236 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lawless, B.
    (2018) Documenting a labor of love: emotional labor as academic labor. Review of Communication, 18(2), 85–97. 10.1080/15358593.2018.1438644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1438644 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, H., & Lee, K.
    (2013) Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 121, 215–230. 10.1007/s10993‑012‑9267‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lillis, T.
    (2012) Economies of signs in writing for academic publication: The case of English medium “national” journals. Journal of Advanced Composition, 32(3–4), 695–722.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
    (2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lillis, T., Magyar, A., & Robinson-Pant, A.
    (2013) Putting ‘wordface’ work at the centre of academic text production: working with an international journal to develop an authors’ mentoring programme. InV. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting Research Writing (pp.237–255). Chandos Publishing. 10.1016/B978‑1‑84334‑666‑1.50015‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-666-1.50015-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lundin, R. A., Jönsson, S., Kreiner, K., & Tienari, J.
    (2010) The changing face of academic publishing: On the past, present and future of the Scandinavian Journal of Management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(3), 309–317. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522110000576. 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  35. MacGregor, K.
    (2022, March12). Higher education report charts rise of the Global South. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20220311151815827
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Marušić, A.
    (2013) First foreword. InV. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting Research Writing (pp.xv–xvii). Chandos Publishing. 10.1016/B978‑1‑84334‑666‑1.50019‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-666-1.50019-9 [Google Scholar]
  37. Marušić, A., Lukić, I. K., Marušić, M., McNamee, D., Sharp, D., & Horton, R.
    (2002) Peer Review in a Small and a Big Medical Journal: Case Study of the Croatian Medical Journal and The Lancet. Croatian Medical Journal, 431, 286–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Marušić, A., & Marušić, M.
    (1999) Small Scientific Journals from Small Countries: Breaking from a Vicious Circle of Inadequacy. Croatian Medical Journal, 40(4), 508–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Marušić, M., & Marušić, A.
    (2014) The Croatian Medical Journal: Success and consequences. InK. Bennett (Ed.), The semiperiphery of academic writing: discourses, communities and practices (pp.210–220). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137351197_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351197_12 [Google Scholar]
  40. Marušić, M., Misak, A., Kljakovic-Gaspic, M., Fister, K., Hren, D., & Marušić, A.
    (2004) Producing a scientific journal in a small scientific community: An author-helpful policy. International Microbiology, 71, 143–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. McKay, S. L.
    (2003) Reflections on being a gatekeeper. InC. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes in Language Education (pp.91–102). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mišak, A., Marušić, M., & Marušić, A.
    (2005) Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(2), 122–131. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mok, K.-H.
    (2014) Promoting the global university in Taiwan: University governance reforms and academic reflections. InC. P. Chou (Ed.), The SSCI syndrome in higher education: A local or global phenomenon (pp.1–24). Sense Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑6209‑407‑9_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-407-9_1 [Google Scholar]
  44. OECD
    OECD (2023) Main Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI database)https://data-explorer.oecd.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pemberton, M. A.
    (2022) Gatekeeper, guardian, or guide? Negotiating the dynamics of power as an editor. InG. Giberson, M. Schoen, & C. Weisser (Eds.), Behind the curtain of scholarly publishing: Editors in writing studies (pp.139–152). Utah State University Press. 10.7330/9781646422173.c010
    https://doi.org/10.7330/9781646422173.c010 [Google Scholar]
  46. Petrić, B.
    (2014) English-medium journals in Serbia: Editors’ perspectives. InK. Bennett (Ed.), The semiperiphery of academic writing: discourses, communities and practices (pp.189–209). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137351197_11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351197_11 [Google Scholar]
  47. Salager-Meyer, F.
    (2008) Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121–132. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X3M-4SDFS78-1/2/eda5a243113a88ff2e35d2c599342d5b. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2015) Peripheral scholarly journals: From locality to globality. Iberica, 301, 15–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Scanlan, S.
    (2013) A Brief Introduction on Peer Review: New Possibilities. NANO: New American Notes Online (3). https://search.proquest.com/docview/2326860312?accountid=10067
    [Google Scholar]
  50. SCImago
    SCImago. (n.d.). SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]. RetrievedOctober, 19fromwww.scimagojr.com
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Shaw, O.
    (2022) Mediation and uptake in manuscript revision. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 3(1), 6–28. 10.1075/jerpp.21006.sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21006.sha [Google Scholar]
  52. Sheridan, C. L.
    (2015) National journals and centering institutions: A historiography of an English language teaching journal in Taiwan. English for Specific Purposes, 381, 70–84. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2017) English Medium “National” Journals Beyond the Anglophone Center: A Qualitative Study of Multilingual Scholars and their Publishing Decisions in Taiwan [Indiana University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (2022) Editorial Peer Review at Basic and Applied Science Journals in the Semiperiphery Context of Taiwan. InM. Z. C. Hanganu-Bresch, G. Cutrufello, & S. Maci (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication (pp.90–101). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003043782‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043782-10 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2025) Languages of publication among multilingual researchers: Locality to mobility in the Taiwan context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 751, 101501. 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101501
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101501 [Google Scholar]
  56. Spooner, M.
    (2022) The shape of editorial work. InG. Giberson, M. Schoen, & C. Weisser (Eds.), Behind the curtain of scholarly publishing: Editors in writing studies (pp.vii–xiii). Utah State University Press. 10.7330/9781646422173.c000a
    https://doi.org/10.7330/9781646422173.c000a [Google Scholar]
  57. Stake, R. E.
    (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B.
    (2019) Journal Editors: Gatekeepers or custodians. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp.253–270). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_14 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tardy, C. M.
    (2019) We are all reviewer #2: A window into the secret world of peer review. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication: Authors, mentors, gatemkeepers (pp.271–289). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5_15
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_15 [Google Scholar]
  60. Vanderstraeten, R.
    (2011) Scholarly Communication in Education Journals [Article]. Social Science History, 35(1), 109–130. 10.1017/S014555320001419X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014555320001419X [Google Scholar]
  61. Wallerstein, I.
    (1991) Geopolitics and geoculture: Essays on the changing world-system. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. (2004) World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang, F.-N.
    (2006) Measures to shorten publication lags for journals in China. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 38(1), 41–46. search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=23181024&site=ehost-live. 10.1353/scp.2007.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/scp.2007.0001 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2008) Problems and solutions for social science journals at Chinese universities. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(4), 410–416. 10.3138/jsp.39.4.410search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=33004630&site=ehost-live
    https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.39.4.410 [Google Scholar]
  65. Weller, A. C.
    (2002) Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. American Society for Information Science and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Yancey, K. B.
    (2022) Greater than the sum of its parts: Enacting an editorial philosophy at College Composition and Communication. InG. Giberson, M. Schoen, & C. Weisser (Eds.), Behind the curtain of scholarly publishing: Editors in writing studies (pp.92–102). Utah State University Press. 10.7330/9781646422173.c007
    https://doi.org/10.7330/9781646422173.c007 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25006.she
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25006.she
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error