1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how expert writers achieve textuality in 740 research articles (RAs) in Applied Linguistics. The study first examined the writers’ currently-used links between ideas across paragraphs in the introductory sections of 240 research articles. Then, in the second phase, 500 RAs over three decades were compiled to trace the emergent trends of global cohesion in RA introductions. Content analysis explored patterns of cohesive devices and the extent to which professional RA authors create textuality. Results of the first phase demonstrated that cohesion across paragraphs was achieved through both single and multi-unit constructions, along with explicit and implicit ties. Subsequent to as the single dominant explicit device, over 30 percent of cohesion was established through the use of phrasal patterns. Moreover, the study revealed an increase in the use of implicit devices over the three decades. While adapting and refining Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) cohesion framework, this study offers pedagogical implications for early-career academic writers and writing instructors.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
2025-12-04
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S.
    (2020) The creative use of cohesive devices: Exploring new roles. Journal for Researching Education Practice and Theory, 3(1), 4–51. https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/1599
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ary, D. J., Jacobs, L., Irvine, L. C. S., & Walker, D.
    (2019) Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, V. K.
    (1997) Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (3), 181–195. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00039‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7 [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  5. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2011) Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence. InL. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1236–1241). Cognitive Science Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (2014) Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 261, 66–79. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2016) The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 481, 1227–1237. 10.3758/s13428‑015‑0651‑7
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W.
    (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
  9. Duggleby, S. J., Tang, W., & Kuo-Newhouse, A.
    (2015) Does the use of connective words in written assessments predict high school students’ reading and writing achievement?Reading Psychology, 37(4), 511–532. 10.1080/02702711.2015.1066910
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1066910 [Google Scholar]
  10. Férez Mora, P. A., Coyle, Y., & Solís Becerra, J. A.
    (2021) Cohesion in the Narrative Writing of Young EFL Learners: Correct and Incorrect Use of Local Cohesive Ties. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 431, 11, 154–17710.28914/Atlantis‑2021‑43.1.09
     https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.1.09 [Google Scholar]
  11. Foltz, P. W.
    (2007) Discourse coherence and LSA. InT. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp.167–184). Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao, X.
    (2016) A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of linking adverbials in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 241, 14–28. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R.
    (2023) Research questions in applied linguistics research: A microscopic analysis of their distributional and syntactical aspects. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 156–167. 10.22055/rals.2023.18074
     https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.18074 [Google Scholar]
  14. Golparvar, S. E., Crosthwaite, P., & Ziaeian, E.
    (2024) Mapping cohesion in research articles of applied linguistics: A close look at rhetorical sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 671, 101316. 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101316
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101316 [Google Scholar]
  15. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M.
    (2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 361, 193–202. 10.3758/BF03195564
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gray, B.
    (2010) On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167–183. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E.
    (2012) Applied thematic analysis. Sage. 10.4135/9781483384436
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436 [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2013) Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Writing Assessment, 181, 218–238. 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Han, Y., & Gardner, S.
    (2024) Cohesion in research article abstracts and introductions: A corpus-based analysis of expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 661, 101276. 10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101276
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101276 [Google Scholar]
  21. Heller, M.
    (1999) Reading-writing connections: From theory to practice. (2nd ed.). Longman. 10.4324/9781410601650
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601650 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyland, K.
    (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin, H.
    (2019) On the anaphoric use of demonstratives this/these in L2 academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 381, 62–74. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanoksilapatham, B.
    (2015) Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 371, 74–86. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  25. Krippendorff, K.
    (2018) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Laksana, T. P.
    (2024) The analysis of cohesive devices used in Scopus-Indexed Journal. Jolly Journal of English Education, 2(1), 15–26. Retrieved fromhttps://ejournal.staihwduri.ac.id/index.php/jjee/article/view/81
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
    (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, J., Park, H., & Kim, S.
    (2021) Grammatical cohesion in research articles: A study of reference and substitution in academic writing. Linguistics and Education, 631, 100918. 10.1016/j.linged.2021.100918
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100918 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lei, L.
    (2012) Exploring how EAP writers establish authorial identity and stance through cohesive devices in applied linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 135–144. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. MacMillan, F.
    (2007) The role of lexical cohesion in the assessment of EFL reading proficiency. Arizona Working Papers in SLA and Teaching, 141, 75–93. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/AZSLAT/article/download/21265/20845
     [Google Scholar]
  31. McCulley, G. A.
    (1985) Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 191, 269–280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171050. 10.58680/rte198515640
     https://doi.org/10.58680/rte198515640 [Google Scholar]
  32. McGee, I.
    (2009) Traversing the lexical cohesion minefield. ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal, 63(3), 212–220. 10.1093/elt/ccn040
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn040 [Google Scholar]
  33. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Butler-Songer, N., & Kintsch, W.
    (1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 141, 1–43. 10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1 [Google Scholar]
  34. McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M.
    (2010) Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 271, 57–86. 10.1177/0741088309351547
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547 [Google Scholar]
  35. McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & Roscoe, R.
    (2013) Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Behavior Research Methods, 451, 499–515. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0258‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1 [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2007) Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 431, 121–152. 10.1080/01638530709336895
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336895 [Google Scholar]
  37. Padula, M., Panza, C., & Muñoz, V. L.
    (2020) The pronoun this as a cohesive encapsulator in engineering semi-popularization articles written in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 441, 100828. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100828
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100828 [Google Scholar]
  38. Poudel, A. P.
    (2018) Academic writing: Coherence and cohesion in paragraph (Research Project). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322537095_Academic_Writing_Coherence_and_Cohesion_in_Paragraph (accessed on3 November 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramilevna Kayumova, A., Eduardovna Nigmatullina, L., KharisovnaTarasova, F., & Mikhailovich Tarasov, A.
    (2023) The Phenomenon of shared interference to develop the collective competence of students in learning English. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 461–465. 10.22055/rals.2023.19588
     https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.19588 [Google Scholar]
  40. Riadi, A., Nathania, N., Valentino, Y. B.
    (2023) Types and appropriateness: 165 Students usage of conjunctions in academic writing). Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 9(2), 165–177. 10.29300/ling.v9i2.2590
     https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v9i2.2590 [Google Scholar]
  41. Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R.
    (2010) Pivot grammar. InDictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed., p.440). Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C.
    (2018) Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. 10.1007/s11135‑017‑0574‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shokri, A.
    (2016) Peripheral themes in Applied Linguistics articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 138–157. 10.22055/rals.2016.11781
     https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2016.11781 [Google Scholar]
  44. Trisnaningrum, Y., Alek, A., & Hidayat, D. N.
    (2019) Discourse analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in college students’ academic writing essay. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 6(1), 79–90. 10.15408/ijee.v6i1.12502
     https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v6i1.12502 [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, W. & Sun, Y.
    (2012) The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23 (1), 31–48. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
Loading
Uncovering global cohesion patterns in the introductory sections of Applied Linguistics research articles
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 6, 37 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cohesion; cohesive devices; cohesive patterns; global cohesion; research articles.

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error