1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Over the past three decades, a growing body of ethnographic case studies has sought to describe the teaching and learning of writing for research publication in STEM disciplines, combining interviews and observations of writing-focused supervision meetings with the collection of research article drafts into thick descriptions of the practices and challenges faced by doctoral students and their supervisor (sometimes called ‘advisor’ in North American settings). While these existing studies share a similar interest in student-supervisor co-authoring practices as a site for disciplinary apprenticeship and enculturation, they differ considerably in their disciplinary and geographic context, focal points of analysis and conclusions. Taking an interpretive approach to qualitative synthesis, the present review brings together twenty-one such ethnographic accounts in order to tease out shared findings as well as to critically explore differences between studies. To this end, the studies are articulated along two complementary dimensions: firstly, the studies trace how doctoral students in STEM disciplines struggle to adapt their existing reading and writing practices to the new purposes and audiences of a research article. Secondly, the studies portray varied facets of the evolving and often complex student-supervisor relationship, characterized by unfolding changes in the roles these participants assign to themselves and each other. In light of the described practices and challenges, the review then turns to the ongoing debate on whether situated learning to write for publication in STEM disciplines can be considered a writing pedagogy. Finally, some remaining gaps in our knowledge base are suggested as fertile ground for further ethnographic studies of doctoral writing in STEM disciplines.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25013.mat
2025-12-04
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25013.mat
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, C., Catterall, J., Ross, P., & Burgin, S.
    (2012) ‘Tough love and tears’: Learning doctoral writing in the sciences. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 435–447. 10.1080/07294360.2011.559195
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559195 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J.
    (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59. 10.1186/1471‑2288‑9‑59
     https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazerman, C.
    (1992) From cultural criticism to disciplinary participation: Living with powerful words. InA. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp.61–68). MLA.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Belcher, D.
    (1994) The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 23–34. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90022‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90022-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blakeslee, A. M.
    (1997) Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(2), 125–169. 10.1177/1050651997011002001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651997011002001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrasco, A., Kent, R., & Keranen, N.
    (2012) Learning careers and enculturation: Production of scientific papers by PhD students in a Mexican physiology laboratory: An exploratory case study. InC. Bazerman, C. Dean, J. Early, K. Lunsford, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), International advances in writing research: Cultures, places, measures (pp.335–351). WAC Clearinghouse. 10.37514/PER‑B.2012.0452.2.19
     https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2012.0452.2.19 [Google Scholar]
  7. Catterall, J., Ross, P., Aitchison, C., & Burgin, S.
    (2011) Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(2), 7. 10.53761/1.8.2.7
     https://doi.org/10.53761/1.8.2.7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. K.
    (2017) Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 461, 107–123. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cumming, J.
    (2009) The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 877–890. 10.1080/01411920902834191
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902834191 [Google Scholar]
  10. Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P.
    (2001) Doctoring Uncertainty: Mastering Craft Knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 87–107. 10.1177/030631201031001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031001005 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fazel, I., & Habibie, P.
    (2024) An Analysis of Writing for Publication Research on Novice Anglophone (L1) Academics: A Scientometric Perspective. InH. Meihami & R. Esfandiari (Eds.), A Scientometrics Research Perspective in Applied Linguistics (pp.163–196). Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Feldon, D. F., Litson, K., Jeong, S., Blaney, J. M., Kang, J., Miller, C., Griffin, K., & Roksa, J.
    (2019) Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 20910–20916. 10.1073/pnas.1912488116
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912488116 [Google Scholar]
  13. Florence, M. K., & Yore, L. D.
    (2004) Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 637–668. 10.1002/tea.20015
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20015 [Google Scholar]
  14. Flowerdew, J., & Habibie, P.
    (2022) Introducing English for research publication purposes. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429317798
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429317798 [Google Scholar]
  15. Golde, C., Bueschel, A., Jones, L., & Walker, G. E.
    (2006) Apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate. InConference proceedings of the National Conference on Doctoral Education and the Faculty of the Future. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Vol.91).
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K.
    (2018) Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), e12931. 10.1111/eci.12931
     https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Lonka, K., & Makkonen, J.
    (2014) How does collaborative authoring in doctoral programs socially shape practices of academic excellence?Talent Development & Excellence, 6(1).
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, Y., Zhao, X., & van Veen, K.
    (2020) Unraveling the implicit challenges in fostering independence: Supervision of Chinese doctoral students at Dutch universities. Instructional Science, 481, 205–221. 10.1007/s11251‑020‑09505‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6 [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, J. C.
    (2010) Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES PhD students in science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 33–44. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P.
    (1991) The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2(2). 10.5070/L422005141
     https://doi.org/10.5070/L422005141 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jowsey, T., Corter, A., & Thompson, A.
    (2020) Are doctoral theses with articles more popular than monographs? Supervisors and students in biological and health sciences weigh up risks and benefits. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 719–732. 10.1080/07294360.2019.1693517
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1693517 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kamler, B.
    (2008) Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. 10.1080/03075070802049236
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049236 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kobayashi, S., Grout, B. W., & Rump, C. Ø.
    (2015) Opportunities to learn scientific thinking in joint doctoral supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 41–51. 10.1080/14703297.2014.981837
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981837 [Google Scholar]
  24. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
    (1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  26. Leander, K., & Prior, P.
    (2004) Speaking and writing: How talk and text interact in situated practices. InC. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp.201–237). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lei, J., & Hu, G.
    (2015) Apprenticeship in scholarly publishing: A student perspective on doctoral supervisors’ roles. Publications, 3(1), 27–42. 10.3390/publications3010027
     https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3010027 [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Y.
    (2006) A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 456–478. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2007) Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An intraview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 55–79. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00040.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00040.x [Google Scholar]
  30. (2012) “I have no time to find out where the sentences came from; I just rebuild them”: A biochemistry professor eliminating novices’ textual borrowing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 59–70. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2019) Mentoring junior scientists for research publication. InP. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication (pp.233–250). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95333‑5_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_13 [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Y., Ma, X., Zhao, J., & Hu, J.
    (2020) Graduate-level research writing instruction: Two Chinese EAP teachers’ localized ESP genre-based pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 431, 100813. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100813
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100813 [Google Scholar]
  33. Liardét, C. L., & Thompson, L.
    (2022) Monograph v. Manuscript: Exploring the factors that influence English L1 and EAL candidates’ thesis-writing approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 436–449. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1852394
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1852394 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
    (2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. 10.1177/0741088305283754
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305283754 [Google Scholar]
  35. Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. E., & Chao, J.
    (2014) Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 699–711. 10.1080/07294360.2013.863850
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863850 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez, R., & Graf, K.
    (2016) Thesis supervisors as literacy brokers in Brazil. Publications, 4(3), 26.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Matzler, P.
    (2021) Mentoring and Co-Writing for Research Publication Purposes: Interaction and Text Development in Doctoral Supervision. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003152637
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003152637 [Google Scholar]
  38. Myers, G.
    (1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Negretti, R.
    (2021) Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167–207. 10.1177/0741088320984796
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796 [Google Scholar]
  40. Negretti, R., & McGrath, L.
    (2020) English for specific playfulness? How doctoral students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics manipulate genre. English for Specific Purposes, 601, 26–39. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  41. Noblit, G. W.
    (2018) Meta-ethnography: Adaptation and return. InL. Urrieta & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Cultural constructions of identity: Meta-ethnography and theory (pp.34–50). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D.
    (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781412985000
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985000 [Google Scholar]
  43. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M.
    (2016) Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Paré, A.
    (2011) Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. Doctoral Education: Research-Based Strategies for Doctoral Students, Supervisors and Administrators, 59–74. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑0507‑4_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  45. Simpson, S.
    (2013) Systems of Writing Response: A Brazilian Student’s Experiences Writing for Publication in an Environmental Sciences Doctoral Program. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(2), 228–249. 10.58680/rte201324326
     https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201324326 [Google Scholar]
  46. Starfield, S.
    (2019) Supervisory feedback: Building writing scaffolds with doctoral students. InK. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed., pp.206–225). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108635547.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.013 [Google Scholar]
  47. Swales, J.
    (2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tardy, C. M.
    (2006) Appropriation, ownership, and agency: Negotiating teacher feedback in academic settings. InK. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.60–78). Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.006 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2021) What is (and could be) thick description in academic writing research?InI. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle (Eds.), Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research (pp.21–38). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/rmal.1.02tar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.02tar [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu, B., & Paltridge, B.
    (2021) Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses. Lingua, 2531, 103071. 10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25013.mat
Loading
Learning to write for publication in STEM doctorates
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 6, 6 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.25013.mat
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25013.mat
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25013.mat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): apprenticeship; co-authoring; doctoral writing; postgraduate research writing; STEM; supervision

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error