1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2590-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2590-1001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this conceptual article I aim to advance our understanding of digital genre networks in online science communication. Specifically, I develop genre theory by drawing on the meta-theory of complexity, which involves two highly influential interpretive frameworks, complexity theory and complex systems theory, and their related subfields, complex network theory and complex dynamic systems theory. I conceptualise digital genre networks as analogous to complex, dynamic systems, with their constituent genres acting as interconnected nodes that achieve specific social actions. I explain the theoretical and practical rationales behind this conceptual model and outline how to empirically demonstrate the structured heterogeneity and holistic behaviour of digital genre networks using several constructs from the meta-theory of complexity — non-linearity, adaptability, coevolution, self-organisation and dynamic interactions. The conceptual model also involves methodological developments, which I illustrate using case study research designs. Finally, I suggest some future directions for expanding the field of English for Research Publication Purposes and broader fields, and propose ways of training researchers who need or want to compose digital genre networks to increase the visibility and impact of their work.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25019.per
2025-12-04
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25019.per
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, J., Bazerman, C., & Schneider, J.
    (2014) Beyond single genres: Pattern mapping in global communication. InE.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp.305–322). Mouton de Gruyter, 10.1515/9783110220674.305
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220674.305 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnstein, S. R.
    (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224. 10.1080/01944366908977225
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 [Google Scholar]
  3. Askehave, I., & Nielsen, A. E.
    (2005) Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 120–141. 10.1108/09593840510601504
     https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510601504 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazerman, C.
    (1994) Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. InA. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp.79–101). Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. (2004) Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organise activity and people. InC. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analysing texts and textual practices (pp.309–339). Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berkenkotter, C.
    (2001) Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualisation in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication, 18(3), 326–349. 10.1177/0741088301018003004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018003004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatia, V. K.
    (2004) Worlds of written discourse. Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2016) The competing demands of popularisation vs. economy: Written language in the age of mass literacy. InT. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English (pp.314–328). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E.
    (2017) Open science notebooks: New insights, new affordances. Journal of Pragmatics, 1161, 64–76. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Bot, K.
    (2017) Complexity theory and dynamic systems theory. Language Learning & Language Teaching, 481, 51–58. 10.1075/lllt.48.03deb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.03deb [Google Scholar]
  11. Devitt, A.
    (2009) Re-fusing form in genre study. InJ. Giltrow & D. Stein (Eds.), Genres in the Internet: Issues in the theory of genre (pp.27–48). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.188.02dev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.188.02dev [Google Scholar]
  12. Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2022) Designing and evaluating language corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316584880
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584880 [Google Scholar]
  13. Engberg, J.
    (2020) Institutional dissemination of legal knowledge — an instance of knowledge communication. InM. Gotti, S. Maci & M. Sala (Eds.), Scholarly pathways: Knowledge transfer and knowledge exchange in academia (pp.175–205). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. (2023) Dissemination of science and communicative efficiency of texts: Is level of explanatory ambition a relevant diagnostic tool?TransKom — e-journal, 16(1). https://www.trans-kom.eu/bd16nr01/trans-kom_16_01_02_Engberg_Efficiency.20230706.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fecher, B., & Friesike, S.
    (2014) Open science: One term, five schools of thought. InS. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp.17–47). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑00026‑8_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Finnemann, N. O.
    (2016) Hypertext configurations: Genres in networked digital media. JASIST, 1–10, online. 10.1002/asi.23709
     https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23709 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., & Riedlinger, M.
    (2022) A Escada do Poder: Comunicação de Ciência e Ciência Cidadã. Revista Lusófona De Estudos Culturais, 9(2), 15–27. 10.21814/rlec.4059
     https://doi.org/10.21814/rlec.4059 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gear, C., Eppel, E., & Koziol-McLain, J.
    (2022) If we can imagine it, we can build it: Developing complexity theory-informed methodologies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 211. 10.1177/16094069211070936
     https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211070936 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gimenez, J., Baldwin, M., Breen, P., Green, J., Roque Gutierrez, E., Paterson, R., Pearson, J., Percy, M., Specht, D., & Waddell, G.
    (2020) Reproduced, reinterpreted, lost: Trajectories of scientific knowledge across contexts. Text & Talk, 40(3), 293–324. 10.1515/text‑2020‑2059
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2059 [Google Scholar]
  20. Graham, S. S., & Whalen, B.
    (2008) Mode, medium, and genre: A case study of decisions in new-media design. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(1), 65–91. Retrieved fromhttps://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/mode-medium-genre-case-study-decisions-new-media/docview/196459807/se-2. 10.1177/1050651907307709
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907307709 [Google Scholar]
  21. Greene, A. C., & Greene, C. S.
    (2025) Science under threat in the United States: Research turns hope into reality. eLife 2025;131:e106706. 10.7554/eLife.106706
     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.106706 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hafner, C.
    (2018) Genre innovation and multimodal expression in scholarly communication: Video methods articles in experimental biology. Ibérica, 361, 15–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyland, K.
    (2023) Academic publishing and the attention economy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 641, 101253. 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101253
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101253 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Valenzuela-Manzanares, J.
    (2010) InG. Bel-Enguix, & M. D. Jiménez-López (Eds.), Language as a complex dynamic system: A view from cognitive linguistics (pp.3–38). Cambridge Scholars Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kang, M., Jin, T., Lu, X., & Zhang, H.
    (2024) Exploring the differences in syntactic complexity between lay summaries and abstracts: A case study of The New England Journal of Medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 721, 101444. 10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101444
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101444 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kauffman, S. A.
    (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195121049.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195121049.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelly, A. R., & Maddalena, K.
    (2016) Networks, genres, and complex wholes: Citizen science and how we act together through typified text. Canadian Journal of Communication, 41(2), 287–303. 10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3043
     https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3043 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kostoulas, A., & Stelma, J.
    (2024) Complex dynamic systems theory and language education. Reference Module in Social Sciences, Elsevier, online. 10.1016/B978‑0‑323‑95504‑1.00168‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95504-1.00168-X [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuteeva, M.
    (2023) Knowledge flows and languages of publication: English as a bridge and a fence in international knowledge exchanges. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 4(1), 80–93. 10.1075/jerpp.22008.kut
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.22008.kut [Google Scholar]
  30. Kwok, R.
    (2018) Lab notebooks go digital. Nature, 560(7717), 269–270. 10.1038/d41586‑018‑05895‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05895-3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2018) Second Language Acquisition, WE, and language as a complex adaptive system. World Englishes, 37(1), 80–92. 10.1111/weng.12304
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12304 [Google Scholar]
  33. Larsson, T., Kaatari, H., Dixon, T., & Egbert, J.
    (2023) Examining novice writers’ perceptions of formality. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 4(1), 29–55. 10.1075/jerpp.22010.lar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.22010.lar [Google Scholar]
  34. Lemke, J. L.
    (2005) Multimedia genres and traversals. Folia Linguistica, 39(1), 45–56. 10.1515/flin.2005.39.1‑2.45
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2005.39.1-2.45 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lindenman, H.
    (2015) Inventing metagenres: How four college seniors connect writing across domains. Composition Forum, 311. https://compositionforum.com/issue/31/inventing-metagenres.php
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Linell, P.
    (1998) Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualisations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text & Talk, 18(2), 143–158. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mauranen, A.
    (2013) Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 7–36. 10.35360/njes.274
     https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.274 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2018) Second Language Acquisition, World Englishes, and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF). World Englishes, 37(1), 106–119. 10.1111/weng.12306
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12306 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mehlenbacher, A. R.
    (2019) Registered reports: An emerging scientific research article genre. Written Communication, 36(1), 38–67. 10.1177/0741088318804534
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804534 [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller, C. R.
    (1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. 10.1080/00335638409383686
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2016) Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence or something else?Journal of Media Innovations, 3(2), 4–19. 10.5617/jmi.v3i2.2432
     https://doi.org/10.5617/jmi.v3i2.2432 [Google Scholar]
  42. Miller, C. R., & Kelly, A. R.
    (Eds.) (2017) Emerging genres in new media environments. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑40295‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6 [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller, C. R., & Shepherd, D.
    (2004) Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. Retrieved from theUniversity Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/172818
  44. Pauwels, L.
    (Ed.) (2006) Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication. Dartmouth College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Pérez-Llantada, C.
    (2021) Research genres across languages. Multilingual science communication online. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108870528
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870528 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2022) Online data articles: The language of intersubjective stance in a rhetorical hybrid. Written Communication, 39(3), 400–425. 10.1177/07410883221087486
     https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221087486 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2023) ‘Help us better understand our changing climate’: Exploring the discourse of Citizen Science. Discourse & Communication, 0(0). (online first) 10.1177/17504813231158927
     https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231158927 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pérez-Llantada, C. & M.-J. Luzón
    (2023) Genre networks. Intersemiotic relations in digital science communication. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Prokopenko, M.
    (2019) Systems. InB. Fath (Ed.), Elsevier encyclopaedia of ecology (Second Edition), (pp.546–552). 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑409548‑9.10620‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10620-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ross-Hellauer, T.
    (2017) What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 61, 588. 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
     https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Spinuzzi, C.
    (2004) Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. The 22nd annual international conference on design of communication: The engineering of quality documentation (pp.110–116). Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/1026533.1026560
     https://doi.org/10.1145/1026533.1026560 [Google Scholar]
  52. (9July 2009) What if I had called them “genre networks”?Retrieved fromhttps://spinuzzi.blogspot.com/2009/07/what-if-i-had-called-them-genre.html
  53. Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M.
    (2000) Genre ecologies: An open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 169–181. 10.1145/344599.344646
     https://doi.org/10.1145/344599.344646 [Google Scholar]
  54. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. (2017) The concept of discourse community: Some recent personal history. Composition Forum, 371. Retrieved fromhttps://compositionforum.com/issue/37/swales-retrospective.php
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Tardy, C. M.
    (2023) How epidemiologists exploit the emerging genres of twitter for public engagement. English for Specific Purposes, 701, 4–16. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.10.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  57. Vivas-Peraza, A. C.
    (2022) Engaging the public in science crowdfunding: Scientists calling to action through visual and verbal strategies. Visual Review, 91, 1–15. 10.37467/revvisual.v9.3534
     https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3534 [Google Scholar]
  58. Welbourne, D. J., & Grant, W. J.
    (2015) Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public Understanding of Science, 25(6), 706–718. 10.1177/0963662515572068
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wickman, C.
    (2023) Genre and metagenre in biomedical research writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 37(2), 140–173. 10.1177/10506519221143113
     https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519221143113 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zou, H., & Hyland, K.
    (2019) Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs. Discourse Studies, 21(6), 713–733. 10.1177/1461445619866983
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619866983 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25019.per
Loading
Tackling complexity
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 6, 146 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.25019.per
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25019.per
/content/journals/10.1075/jerpp.25019.per
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): complexity theory; digital genres; genre systems; hypertextuality; intertextuality; open science; recontextualisation; resemiotisation

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error