Elly van Gelderen, ed. Cyclical Change Continued

References

1. Borer, H.
   1984 Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110808506
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808506 [Google Scholar]
2. Bybee, J. L., W. Pagliuca & R. D. Perkins
   1991 Back to the Future. Approaches to Grammaticalization (vol.2) ed. byE. C. Traugott, and B. Heine, 17–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb [Google Scholar]
3. Bybee, J. L., W. Pagliuca & R. D. Perkins
   1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chomsky, N.
   1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. von der Gabelentz, G.
   1901 Die Sprachwissenschaft Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.
   [Google Scholar]
6. van Gelderen, E.
   2008 Where did Late Merge go? Grammaticalization as Feature Economy. Studia Linguistica62:3.287–300. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.00150.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.00150.x [Google Scholar]
7. van Gelderen, E.
   2009 Cyclical Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146 [Google Scholar]
8. van Gelderen, E.
   2011 The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. van Gelderen, E.
   2015 Problems of Projection: The Role of Language Change in Labelling Paradoxes. Studia Linguistica72:1.113–127. doi:  10.1111/stul.12041
   https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12041 [Google Scholar]
10. van Gelderen, E.
    2016 Cyclical Change Continued. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227 [Google Scholar]
11. Greenberg, J.
    1960 A Quantitative Approach to the Morphological Typology of Language. International Journal of American Linguistics26.178–194. 10.1086/464575
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464575 [Google Scholar]
12. Hodge, C.
    1970 The Linguistic Cycle. Linguistic Sciences13.1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ledgeway, A.
    2012 From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Jespersen, O.
    1917 Negation in English and other Languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Host.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Matras, Y.
    2011 Grammaticalization and Language Contact. Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalizationed. byH. Narrog & B. Heine, 279–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Meillet, A.
    1921 L’evolution des forms grammaticales. Linguistique historique et linguistique generaleed. byE. Champion, 130–148. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honore Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pescarini, D.
    2014 The Evolution of Italo-Romance Clitic Clusters: Prosodic Restructuring and Morphological Opacity. Diachrony and Dialects: Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italyed. byP. Beninca, A. Ledgeway & N. Vincent, 155–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
18. Reintges, C. H.
    2012 Macroparametric Change and the Synthetic-Analytic Dimension: The Case of Ancient Egyptian. Parameter Theory and Linguistic Changeed. byC. Galves, S. Cyrino, R. Lopes, F. Sandalo, & J. Avelar, 133–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
19. Roberts, I.
    2007 Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Roberts, I.
    2010 Grammaticalization, the Clausal Hierarchy and Semantic Bleaching. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalizationed. byE. C. Traugott & G. Trousdale, 45–73. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.05rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.05rob [Google Scholar]
21. Roberts, I.
    2012 Macroparameters and Minimalism: A Programme for Comparative Research. Parameter Theory and Linguistic Changeed. byC. Galves, S. Cyrino, R. Lopes, F. Sandalo, & J. Avelar, 320–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
22. Roberts, I.
    2014 Subject clitics and macroparameters. Diachrony and Dialects: Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italyed. byP. Beninca, A. Ledgeway & N. Vincent, 177–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
23. Roberts, I.
    2016 Object Clitics. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languagesed. byM. Maiden & A. Ledgeway, 786–801. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0048 [Google Scholar]
24. Roberts, I. & A. Holmberg
    2010 Introduction. Null Subjects: the Structure of Parametric Variationed. byT. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Roberts, I. & A. Roussou
    2003 Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
26. von Schlegel, A. W.
    1818 Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris: Librairie grecque-latine-allemande.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Thomason, S. & T. Kaufman
    1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]