1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax

 
978-1-107-04960-4

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.00009.san
2020-05-25
2020-07-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. von der Gabelentz, G.
    1891 [1901]Die Sprachwissenshaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. 2nd ed.Leipzig: Weigel.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Keenan, E.
    2002 Explaining the Creation of Reflexive Pronouns in English. Studies in the History of English: A Millennial Perspectiveed. byD. Minkova and R. Stockwell, 325–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197143.3.325
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197143.3.325 [Google Scholar]
  3. Lightfoot, D. W.
    1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Timberlake, A.
    1977 Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change. Mechanisms of Syntactic Changeed. byC. Li, 141–177. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Weinreich, U., W. Labov & M. Herzog
    1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Directions for Historical Linguisticsed. byW. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel, 95–189. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.00009.san
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error