Reply to Kassian et al. (2023). Calibrated weighted permutation test detects ancient language connections in the Circumpolar area (Chukotian-Nivkh and Yukaghir-Samoyedic)

References

1. Baxter, William H. & Alexis Manaster Ramer
   2006 Beyond lumping and splitting: Probabilistic issues in historical linguistics. InColin Renfrew, April McMahon & Larry Trask (eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics, vol., –. Cambridge, England: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ceolin, Andrea
   2019 Significance testing of the Altaic family. Diachronica, (). –. 10.1075/dia.17007.ceo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17007.ceo [Google Scholar]
3. Ceolin, Andrea, Cristina Guardiano, Monica Alexandrina Irimia & Giuseppe Longobardi
   2020 Formal syntax and deep history. Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.488871
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.488871 [Google Scholar]
4. Ceolin, Andrea, Cristina Guardiano, Giuseppe Longobardi, Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Luca Bortolussi & Andrea Sgarro
   2021 At the boundaries of syntactic prehistory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, , . 10.1098/rstb.2020.0197
   https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0197 [Google Scholar]
5. Dellert, Johannes & Armin Buch
   2018 A new approach to concept basicness and stability as a window to the robustness of concept list rankings. Language Dynamics and Change. –. 10.1163/22105832‑00802001
   https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00802001 [Google Scholar]
6. Dolgopolsky, Aaron B.
   1986 A probabilistic hypothesis concerning the oldest relationships among the language families in Northern Eurasia. InVitalij V. Shevoroshkin & Thomas L. Markey (eds.), Typology, relationship and time, –. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Heggarty, Paul, Cormac Anderson, Matthew Scarborough, Benedict King, Remco Bouckaert, Lechosław Jocz & Martin Joachim Kümmel
   2023 Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages. Science. . 10.1126/science.abg0818
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0818 [Google Scholar]
8. Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller & Dik Bakker
   2008 Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica(). –. 10.1515/FLIN.2008.331
   https://doi.org/10.1515/FLIN.2008.331 [Google Scholar]
9. Kassian, Alexei, George Starostin, Anna Dybo & Vasiliy Chernov
   2010 The Swadesh wordlist. An attempt at semantic specification. Вопросы языкового родства(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kassian, Alexei, Mikhail Zhivlov & George Starostin
    2015 Proto-Indo-European-Uralic com-parison from the probabilistic point of view. Journal of Indo-European Studies (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kassian, Alexei S., George Starostin, Ilya M. Egorov, Ekaterina S. Logunova & Anna V. Dybo
    2021 Permutation test applied to lexical reconstructions partially supports the Altaic linguistic macrofamily. Evolutionary Human Sciences. . 10.1017/ehs.2021.28
    https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.28 [Google Scholar]
12. Kassian, Alexei S., George Starostin, Mikhail Zhivlov & Sergey A. Spirin
    2023 Calibrated weighted permutation test detects ancient language connections in the Circumpolar area (Chukotian-Nivkh and Yukaghir-Samoyedic). Journal of Historical Linguistics. 10.1075/jhl.00014.kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.00014.kas [Google Scholar]
13. Kessler, Brett
    2001 The significance of word lists. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kessler, Brett
    2007 Word similarity metrics and multilateral comparison. InProceedings of Ninth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Morphology and Phonology, –. Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1626516.1626518
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1626516.1626518 [Google Scholar]
15. Kessler, Brett
    2015 Response to Kassian et al. 2015. Proto-Indo-European-Uralic comparison from the probabilistic point of view. Journal of Indo-European Studies(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kessler, Brett & Annukka Lehtonen
    2006 Multilateral comparison and significance testing of the Indo-Uralic question. InPeter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages, –. Cambridge, England: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nichols, Johanna
    1995 The comparative method as heuristic. InMark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, –. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Oswalt, Robert L.
    1970 The detection of remote linguistic relationships. Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ringe, Donald A.
    1992 On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society(). –. 10.2307/1006563
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1006563 [Google Scholar]
20. Ringe, Donald A.
    1998 Probabilistic evidence for Indo-Uralic. InJoseph Salmons & Brian Joseph (eds.), Nostratic: Sifting the evidence, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.142.10rin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.142.10rin [Google Scholar]
21. Tadmor, Uri, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
    2010 Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.27.2.04tad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.2.04tad [Google Scholar]