1887
Volume 7, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Using quantitative corpus evidence from different periods, the present article analyzes the emergence and diachronic development of the Spanish time constructions (clausal and adverbial) involving contemporary ‘make’ and earlier ‘have’. The obtained data, as well as cross-linguistic evidence, suggest that the clausal construction must have been the source of the adverbial one. A proposal is presented that could explain that development. The data show, in addition, that the grammatical properties and usage patterns of the clausal and adverbial constructions were very similar until the 16th century but have been diverging ever since. This divergence coincides with an exponential increase in the textual raw frequency of the adverbial construction, where word order fixation, erosion of the inflectional morphology and a change in the possibilities for time adjunction among others are found to occur at around the same time. This points towards a desentencialization, loss of inner structure and grammaticalization of the adverbial construction in those periods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.15018.her
2018-01-26
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bourdin, Philippe
    2011 Ten Years Ago and Ten Years Since: Competition and Standardization in Early Modern English. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik53:2.45–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boye, Kasper
    2010 Raising Verbs and Auxiliaries in a Functional Theory of Grammatical Status. Language Usage and Language Structureed. by Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen , 73–104. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219180.1.73
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219180.1.73 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
    2012 A Usage-Based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization. Language88:1.1–44. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinton, Laurel J.
    2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brucart, José M.
    2015 Un análisis derivacional de las construcciones temporales con “hacer”. Studium Gramaticae: Homenaje al profesor José A. Martínez, 165–180. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan
    2003 Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency. The Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda , 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2006 From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language82:4.711–733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cano-Aguilar, Rafael
    2004Historia de la Lengua Española. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cervera Rodríguez, Ángel
    2007 Variedad gramatical y polivalencia pragmática de que. Ex admiratione et amicitia. Homenaje a Ramón Santiagoed. by Alicia Puigvert Ocal & Inmaculada Delgado Cobos , 205–242. Madrid: Ediciones del Orto.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Culicover, Peter W.
    1999Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Smet, Hendrik
    2009 Analysing Reanalysis. Lingua119:11.1728–1755. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deutscher, Guy
    2000Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Diessel, Holger
    2008 Iconicity of Sequence: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Positioning of Temporal Adverbial Clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics19:3.457–482. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  14. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald , eds., 103–120.
  15. Díez Itza, Eliseo
    1992Ha, hay, hace temporales en el siglo de oro. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española (Vol. 1)ed. by M. Ariza Viguera , 373–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Díez Itza, Eliseo & Marta Pérez Toral
    1991Las formas verbales de ciertas expresiones temporales en las lenguas románicas: un estudio de morfosintaxis histórica comparada. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Elerick, Charles
    1989 Latin *abhinc annos (cum): Spanish hace anos (que) . Hispanic Linguistics3:1–2.89–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fábregas, Antonio
    2016 On the Structure and Variation of ‘hace’ as a Temporal Expression. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics45.77–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, Olga
    2007Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Franco, Ludovico
    2012 Movement Triggers and the Etiology of Grammaticalization: The Case of Italian Postposition fa . Sintagma: Revista De Lingüística24.65–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. García-Castillero, Carlos
    2014 De-Adjectival Preverbs in the Old Irish Verbal Complex: A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie61:1.89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagège, Claude
    2010Adpositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575008.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575008.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1998 Does Grammaticalization Need Reanalysis?Studies in Language22:2.315–351. doi: 10.1075/sl.22.2.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.22.2.03has [Google Scholar]
  25. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald , eds., 83–102.
  26. 2006Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2009 From Nominal to Clausal Morphosyntax: Complexity Via Expansion. Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-Cognition, Evolutioned. by Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani , 23–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.85.02fro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.02fro [Google Scholar]
  28. Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh
    1984Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
    2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Herce, Borja
    2017a Past-Future Asymmetries in Time Adverbials and Adpositions: A Cross-Linguistic and Diachronic Perspective. Linguistic Typology21:1.101–132. doi: 10.1515/lingty‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2017b Spanish Time Constructions With hacer: Gradient Judgments and Corpus Data to Solve a Syntactic Conundrum. Belgian Journal of Linguistics31.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hilpert, Martin & Stephan T. Gries
    2016 Quantitative Approaches to Diachronic Corpus Linguistics. The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguisticsed. by Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta , 36–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139600231.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600231.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On Some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalizationed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine , 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  34. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  35. Howe, Chad
    2011 Structural Autonomy in Grammaticalization: Leveling and Retention with Spanish hacer + time . Probus23:2.247–282. doi: 10.1515/prbs.2011.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2011.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Howe, Chad & Diane L. Ranson
    2010 The Evolution of Clausal Temporal Modifiers in Spanish and French. Romance Philology64:2.197–207. doi: 10.1484/J.RPH.3.38
    https://doi.org/10.1484/J.RPH.3.38 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kurzon, Denis
    2008 “Ago” and Its Grammatical Status in English and Other Languages. Adpositions, Pragmatic, Semantic and Syntactic Perspectivesed. by Denis Kurzon & Silvia Adler , 209–227. (= Typological Studies in Language, 74.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.74.11kur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.74.11kur [Google Scholar]
  38. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2004 Possession, Location and Existence. Linguagem, Cultura e Cognição. Estudos de Linguïstica Cognitiva, Vol 1ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva , Amadeu Torres & Miguel Gonçalves , 85–120. Coimbra: Almedina.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lehmann, Christian
    1988 Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourseed. by John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson , 181–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  41. 1992 Word Order Change by Grammaticalization. Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Changeed. by Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein , 395–416. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110886047.395
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886047.395 [Google Scholar]
  42. 1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Munaro, Nicola
    2015 Complementizer Doubling and the Structure of the Topic Field in Italo-Romance. Paper presented atFormal Approaches to Morpho-Syntactic Variation, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 24–25 June 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pérez Toral, Marta
    1992Sintaxis Histórica Funcional del Español: el verbo ‘hacer’ como impersonal. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Panhuis, Dirk
    1984 Prolepsis in Greek as a Discourse Strategy. Glotta62:1/2.26–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Plank, Frans
    2011 Where’s Diachrony?. Linguistic Typology15:2.455–471. doi: 10.1515/lity.2011.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.030 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pusch, Claus D.
    2001Morphosyntax, Informationsstruktur und Pragmatik: Präverbale Marker im gaskognischen Okzitanish und in anderen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. RAE-ASALE
    RAE-ASALE 2009Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. (= Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española .) Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rasmussen, Poul
    1981El verbo hacer en expresiones temporales: Estudio sintáctico y semántico. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española. RDE: Corpus diacrónico del español. Available atcorpus.rae.es/cordenet.html. AccessedJanuary–August 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española. CREA: Corpus de referencia del español actual. Available atcorpus.rae.es/creanet.html. AccessedJune–August 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rigau, Gemma
    1999 Temporal Existential Constructions in Romance. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theoryed. by Yves d’Hulst , Johan Rooryck & Jan Schroten , 307–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan T. Gries
    2003 Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8:2.209–243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  54. Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac
    1991 A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markersed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine , 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho [Google Scholar]
  55. Villa-García, Julio
    2015The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wanner, Dieter
    2005 The Corpus as a Key to Diachronic Explanation. Romanistiche Korpuslinguistik, Vol. 2: Corpora and Diachronic Linguisticsed. by Claus D. Pusch & Wolfgang Raible , 31–44. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wischer, Ilse & Gabriele Diewald
    eds. 2002New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.15018.her
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.15018.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error