1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article proposes that the divergent pattern of verb argument marking found in object focus clauses in the Tuparian branch of the Tupian family comes from the reanalysis of an object nominalization in a cleft construction. Based on the distribution of free and bound person markers, the major alignment pattern can be characterized as nominative-absolutive in simple clauses, with free pronouns expressing the nominative, whereas bound person markers express the absolutive. However, object focus clauses show a distinct alignment pattern: the ergative, and not the absolutive, is indexed by the bound markers on the verb. We present arguments for identifying the object nominalization as the source of this grammar in the object focus clause, showing also how this reanalysis resulted in the nominalizer morpheme and the person markers gaining new functions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.16025.gal
2018-07-20
2019-09-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alves, Poliana M.
    2004O léxico do Tuparí: proposta de um dicionário bilíngüe. Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita”PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aragon, Carolina
    2014A Grammar of Akuntsú, a Tupían Language. University of Hawai‘i,, at MānoaPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008Fonologia e aspectos morfológicos e sintáticos da língua Akuntsú. Universidade de BrasíliaMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Birchall, Joshua
    2015 A Comparison of Verbal Person Marking Across Tupian Languages. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas10:2.487–518.10.1590/1981‑81222015000200007
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-81222015000200007 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2014Argument Marking Patterns in South American Languages. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Braga, Alzerinda
    2005Aspects Morphosyntaxiques de la Langue Makurap/Tupi. Université de ToulousePhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandon, F. R. , Luci Seki
    1984 Moving Interrogatives Without an Initial +wh Node in Tupi. The Syntax of Native American Languagesed. by Eung-Do Cook & Donna B. Gerdts , 72–102. (=Syntax and Semantics, 16.) New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Galucio, Ana Vilacy
    2001The Morphosyntax of Mekens (TUPI). The University of ChicagoPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2006 Relativização na Língua Sakurabiat (Mekens). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas1:1.49–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2011 Nominalization in the Mekens Language. Amerindia35.237–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2014 Estrutura argumental e alinhamento gramatical em Mekens. Sintaxe e Semântica do Verbo em Línguas Indígenas no Brasiled. by Bruna Franchetto , Luciana Storto & Suzi Lima , 167–196. Campinas: Mercado de Letras.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Galucio, Ana Vilacy & Antonia F. Nogueira
    2012 Comparative Study of the Tupari Branch of the Tupi Family: Contributions to Understanding its Historical Development and Internal Classification. Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America V. Austin: Center for Indigenous Languages of Latin America (CILLA).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2014 Causativização e alteração de valência em Mekens e Wayoro. Incremento de Valencia en las lenguas amazonicased. by Francesc Queixalós , Stella Telles & Ana Carla Bruno , 211–233. Bogotá: Instituto Caro Y Cuervo.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Galucio, Ana Vilacy , Sérgio Meira , Joshua Birchall , Denny Moore , Nilson Gabas Jr. , Sebastian Drude , Luciana Storto , Gessiane Picanço & Carmen Reis Rodrigues
    2015 Genealogical Relations and Lexical Distances Within the Tupí Linguistic Family: A Lexicostatistical and Phylogenetic Approach. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas10:2.229–274.10.1590/1981‑81222015000200004
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-81222015000200004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gijn, Rik van
    2014 Subordination Strategies in South America: Nominalization. The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typologyed. by Loretta O’Connor & Pieter Muysken , 274–297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107360105.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360105.015 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gijn, Rik van , Ana Vilacy Galucio & Antonia F. Nogueira
    2015 Subordination Strategies in Tupian Languages. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciencias Humanas10:2.297–324.10.1590/1981‑81222015000200006
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-81222015000200006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gildea, Spike
    1994 The Proto-Cariban and Tupí-Guaraní Object Nominalizing Prefix. Lingüística Tupí-Guaraní/Caribeed. by Ignacio Prado Pastor , 163–177. (= Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüísticos, 8.) Lima, Peru.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1998On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2000Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.43
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.43 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2008 Explaining Similarities Between Main Clauses and Nominalized Clauses. Amerindia32.57–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gildea, Spike & Flávia de Castro Alves
    2010 Nominative-Absolutive: Counter-Universal Split Ergativity in Jê and Cariban. Ergativity in Amazoniaed. by Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós , 159–199. (= Typological Studies in Language, 89.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.89.07gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.89.07gil [Google Scholar]
  22. . To appear. Reconstructing the Source of Nominative-Absolutive Alignment in Two Amazonian Language Families. Reconstructing Syntax: Cognates and Directionality ed. by Eugenio Luján , Jóhanna Barðdal & Spike Gildea . Leiden: Brill Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jensen, C.
    1990 Cross-referencing Changes in Some Tupi-Guarani languages. Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languagesed. by Doris Payne , 117–158. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Langacker, Ronald
    1977 Syntactic Reanalysis. Mechanisms of Syntactic Changeed. by Charles Li , 59–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Moore, Denny
    1994 A Few Aspects of Comparative Tupi Syntax. Revista latinoamericana de studios etnolingüísticos8.151–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Moore, Denny , Ana Vilacy Galucio & Nilson Gabas Jr.
    2008 O desafio de documentar e preservar as línguas amazônicas. Scientific American (Brasil)3.36–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nogueira, Antonia Fernanda
    2011Wayoro ẽmẽto: fonologia segmental e morfossintaxe verbal. Universidade de São PauloMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2017 The Morphosyntax of Nominalization in Wayoro (Tupí): A Preliminary Approach. Diadorim: revista de estudos linguísticos e literários19.250–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. . To appear. Formas verbais finitas e não finitas na língua Wayoro (Tupi). Universidade de São PauloPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nogueira, Antonia Fernanda , Ana V. Galucio , Nicole Soares-Pinto & Adam R. Singerman
    . To appear. Termos de parentesco na família Tupari (Tupi). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodrigues, Aryon. D.
    1984 Relações internas na família linguística Tupí-Guaraní. Antropologia27–28.33–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna & Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara Cabral
    2012 Tupían. The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guideed. by Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona , 495–574. (= The World of Linguistics, 2.) Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110258035.495
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110258035.495 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna , Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara Cabral & Beatriz Carretta Corrrêa da Silva
    2006 Evidências Lingüísticas para a Reconstrução de um Nominalizador de Objeto *-mi para o Proto-Tupí. Estudos da Língua(gem)4:2.21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Santos, Jarde
    2010Documentação da língua Wayoró: para a preservação das línguas indígenas amazônicas. Fundação Universidade de RondôniaMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Singerman, Adam
    2016 Nasal Harmony and Phonotactic Well-Formedness in Tupari. International Journal of American Linguistics82:4.453–485.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Voort, Hein van der
    2007 Proto-Jabutí: Um primeiro passo na reconstrução da língua ancestral dos Arikapú e Djeoromitxí. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas2:2.133–168.10.1590/S1981‑81222007000200007
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-81222007000200007 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.16025.gal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.16025.gal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error