1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124

Abstract

Abstract

Historical Glottometry is a method, recently proposed by Kalyan and François (François 2014Kalyan & François 2018), for analyzing and representing the relationships among sister languages in a language family. We present a glottometric analysis of the Sogeram language family of Papua New Guinea and, in the process, provide an evaluation of the method. We focus on three topics that we regard as problematic: how to handle the higher incidence of cross-cutting isoglosses in the Sogeram data; how best to handle lexical innovations; and what to do when the data do not allow the analyst to be sure whether a given language underwent a given innovation or not. For each topic we compare different ways of coding and calculating the data and suggest the best way forward. We conclude by proposing changes to the way glottometric data are coded and calculated and the way glottometric results are visualized. We also discuss how to incorporate Historical Glottometry into an effective historical-linguistic research workflow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.17011.dan
2019-07-02
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bowern, Claire
    2013 Relatedness as a Factor in Language Contact. Journal of Language Contact6:2.411–432. doi:  10.1163/19552629‑00602010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00602010 [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell, Eric W.
    2017 Otomanguean Historical Linguistics: Exploring the Subgroups. Language and Linguistics Compass11:7.e12244. doi:  10.1111/lnc3.12244
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12244 [Google Scholar]
  3. Daniels, Don
    2010a A Preliminary Phonological History of the Sogeram Languages of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics49:1.163–193. 10.1353/ol.0.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0068 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010b The Position of Manat Within the Sogeram Family. Talk presented at theAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2014 Complex Coordination in Diachrony: Two Sogeram Case Studies. Diachronica31:3.379–406. 10.1075/dia.31.3.03dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.3.03dan [Google Scholar]
  6. 2015 A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, Lexicon, and Morphosyntax. University of California, Santa BarbaraPhD dissertation.
  7. 2016 Magɨ: An Undocumented Language of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics55:1.199–224. 10.1353/ol.2016.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0004 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017a A Method for Mitigating the Problem of Borrowing in Syntactic Reconstruction. Studies in Language41:3.577–614. 10.1075/sl.41.3.02dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.3.02dan [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017b Gants is a Sogeram Language. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia35.82–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DeLancey, Scott
    2015 The Historical Dynamics of Morphological Complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery13:2.60–79. doi:  10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.463
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.463 [Google Scholar]
  11. Epps, Patience
    2013 Inheritance, Calquing, or Independent Innovation? Reconstructing Morphological Complexity in Amazonian Numerals. Journal of Language Contact6:2.329–357. doi:  10.1163/19552629‑00602007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00602007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, Greville Corbett, Gary Holton, Marian Klamer, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
    2013 Conditions on Pronominal Marking in the Alor-Pantar Languages. Linguistics51:1.33–74. doi:  10.1515/ling‑2013‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Foley, William A.
    2017 The Languages of the Sepik-Ramu Basin and Environs. InBill Palmer, ed., 197–432.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. François, Alexandre
    2005 Unraveling the History of the Vowels of Seventeen Northern Vanuatu Languages. Oceanic Linguistics44:2.443–504. 10.1353/ol.2005.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0034 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2011 Social Ecology and Language History in the Northern Vanuatu Linkage: A Tale of Divergence and Convergence. Journal of Historical Linguistics1:2.175–246. doi:  10.1075/jhl.1.2.03fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.1.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012 The Dynamics of Linguistic Diversity: Egalitarian Multilingualism and Power Imbalance Among Northern Vanuatu Languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2012:214.85–110. doi:  10.1515/ijsl‑2012‑0022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0022 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 Shadows of Bygone Lives: The Histories of Spiritual Words in Northern Vanuatu. Lexical and Structural Etymology: Beyond Word Historiesed. byRobert Mailhammer, 185–244. (= Studies in Language Change, 11.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614510581.185
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510581.185 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014 Trees, Waves and Linkages: Models of Language Diversification. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. byClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans, 161–189. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Geraghty, Paul
    1983The History of the Fijian Languages. (= Oceanic Linguistics, Special Publication 19.) Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Harris, Kyle
    1990 Nend Grammar Essentials. Two Grammatical Studiesed. byJohn R. Roberts, 73–156. (= Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, 37.) Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heuvel, Wilco van den & Sebastian Fedden
    2014 Greater Awyu and Greater Ok: Inheritance or Contact?Oceanic Linguistics53:1.1–36. doi:  10.1353/ol.2014.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2014.0008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François
    2018 Freeing the Comparative Method from the tree model: A framework for Historical Glottometry. InRitsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence Reid (eds), Let’s talk about trees: Genetic Relationships of Languages and Their Phylogenic Representation (Senri Ethnological Studies, 98). Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology. 59–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Korn, Agnes
    2016 A Partial Tree of Central Iranian: A New Look at Iranian Subphyla. Indogermanische Forschungen121:1.401–434. doi:  10.1515/if‑2016‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2016-0021 [Google Scholar]
  24. Loughnane, Robyn & Sebastian Fedden
    2011 Is Oksapmin Ok? A Study of the Genetic Relationship Between Oksapmin and the Ok Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics31:1.1–42. 10.1080/07268602.2011.533635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2011.533635 [Google Scholar]
  25. Matisoff, James A.
    2002 Genetic Versus Contact Relationship: Prosodic Diffusibility in South-East Asian Languages. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguisticsed. byAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon, 291–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nichols, Johanna
    1996 The Comparative Method as Heuristic. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Changeed. byMark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 39–71. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Palmer, Bill
    ed. 2018The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pawley, Andrew
    1999 Chasing Rainbows: Implications of the Rapid Dispersal of Austronesian Languages for Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Selected Papers from the 8th International Conference in Austronesian Linguisticsed. byElizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li, 95–138. Taipei: Academica Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2005 The Chequered Career of the Trans New Guinea Hypothesis: Recent Research and Its Implications. InAndrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide, eds., 67–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2006 Madang Languages. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol.7ed. byKeith Brown, 429–432. Boston: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/04847‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04847-1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pawley, Andrew, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide
    eds. 2005Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-speaking Peoples. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström
    2017 The Trans New Guinea Family. InBill Palmer, ed., 21–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pelkey, Jamin
    2015 Reconstructing Phylogeny from Linkage Diffusion: Evidence for Cladistic Hinge Variation. Diachronica32:3.397–433. 10.1075/dia.32.3.04pel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.3.04pel [Google Scholar]
  34. Ross, Malcolm
    1988Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian Languages of Western Melanesia. (= Pacific Linguistics C, 98.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1997 Social Networks and Kinds of Speech-Community Event. Archaeology and Language I: Theoretical and Methodological Orientationsed. byRoger Blench & Matthew Spriggs, 209–261. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2005 Pronouns as a Preliminary Diagnostic for Grouping Papuan Languages. InAndrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide, eds., 15–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2015 The Argument Indexing of Early Austronesian Verbs: A Reconstructional Myth?Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5–9 August 2013ed. byDag T. T. Haug, 257–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.334.14ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.14ros [Google Scholar]
  38. Sarvasy, Hannah
    2014 Four Finisterre-Huon Languages: An Introduction. STUF – Language Typology and Universals67:3.275–295. doi:  10.1515/stuf‑2014‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2014-0017 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schleicher, August
    1853 Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur, 786–787.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt, Johannes
    1872Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wade, Martha
    1991An Overview of the Culture of the Apalɨ Speaking People. Ms, Pioneer Bible Translators.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1993 Language Convergence or Divergence: The Case of the Apalɨ (Emerum) Language. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia24.73–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 1997 Switch Reference and Control in Apalɨ. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia28.1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Willis, David
    2011 Reconstructing Last Week’s Weather: Syntactic Reconstruction and Brythonic Free Relatives. Journal of Linguistics47:2.407–446. doi:  10.1017/S0022226710000381
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000381 [Google Scholar]
  45. Z’graggen, John A.
    1971Classificatory and Typological Studies in Languages of the Madang District. (= Pacific Linguistics C, 19.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 1975aThe Languages of the Madang District, Papua New Guinea. (= Pacific Linguistics B, 41.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1975b The Madang-Adelbert Range Subphylum. Papuan Languages and the New Guinea Linguistic Sceneed. byStephen A. Wurm, 569–612. (= Pacific Linguistics C, 38.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1980A Comparative Word List of the Southern Adelbert Range Languages, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. (= Pacific Linguistics D, 33.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.17011.dan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.17011.dan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error