Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


This is a commentary article in response to the following content:
Save the trees

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baum, David A. & Stacey D. Smith
    2013Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brugmann, Karl
    1884 Zur Frage nach den Verwandtschaftsverhältnissen der indogermanischen Sprachen. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft1, 226–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Donohue, Mark
    2013 Who Inherits What, When? Toward a Theory of Contact, Substrates, and Superimposition Zones. Language Typology and Historical Contingency: In Honor of Johanna Nicholsed. byBalthasar Bickel, Lenore Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake, 219–240. (= Typological Studies in Language, 104.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.104.09don
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.104.09don [Google Scholar]
  5. François, Alexandre
    2011 Social Ecology and Language History in the Northern Vanuatu Linkage: A Tale of Divergence and Convergence. Journal of Historical Linguistics1:2.175–246. 10.1075/jhl.1.2.03fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.1.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014 Trees, Waves and Linkages: Models of Language Diversification. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. byClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans, 161–189. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 Méthode comparative et chaînages linguistiques: Pour un modèle diffusionniste en généalogie des langues. Diffusion: implantation, affinités, convergenceed. byJean-Léo Léonard, 43–82. (= Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, XXIV.) Louvain : Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Galtier, Nicolas & Vincent Daubin
    2008 Dealing with Incongruence in Phylogenomic Analyses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences363:1512.4023–4029. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0144
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0144 [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenhill, Simon J. & Russell D. Gray
    2012 Basic Vocabulary and Bayesian Phylolinguistics: Issues of Understanding and Representation. Diachronica29:4.523–537. 10.1075/dia.29.4.05gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.4.05gre [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacques, Guillaume & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics9:1. 128–16610.1075/jhl.17008.mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17008.mat [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François
    2018 Freeing the Comparative Method from the Tree Model: A Framework for Historical Glottometry. Let’s Talk About Trees: Genetic Relationships of Languages and Their Phylogenic Representationed. byRitsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid, 59–90. (= Senri Ethnological Studies, 98). Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leskien, August
    1876Die Declination im Slavisch-Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Maddison, Wayne P.
    1997 Gene Trees in Species Trees. Systematic Biology45:523–536. 10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523
    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523 [Google Scholar]
  14. Madigan, David & Jeremy York
    1995 Bayesian Graphical Models for Discrete Data. International Statistical Review63:2.215–232. 10.2307/1403615
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1403615 [Google Scholar]
  15. Nichols, Johanna
    1992Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Pagel, Mark & Andrew Meade
    2004 A Phylogenetic Mixture Model for Detecting Pattern-Heterogeneity in Gene Sequence or Character-State Data. Systematic Biology53:571–581. 10.1080/10635150490468675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490468675 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ross, Malcolm D.
    1997 Social Networks and Kinds of Speech-Community Event. Archaeology and Language 1: Theoretical and Methodological Orientationsed. byRoger Blench & Matthew Spriggs, 209–261. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. de Saussure, Ferdinand
    1995 [1916]Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Éditions Payot & Rivages.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmidt, Johannes
    1872Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1900Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten. Probe-Vorlesung, gehalten zu Leipzig am 30. April 1870. Graz.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wen, Dingqiao, Yun Yu & Luay Nakhleh
    2016 Bayesian Inference of Reticulate Phylogenies Under the Multispecies Network Coalescent. PLOS Genetics12:5.e1006006. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006006
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006006 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error