Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper discusses the processes of Homorganic Cluster Lengthening (HCL) and Pre-Cluster Shortening (PCS) occurring in the late Old English and Early Middle English periods. These processes are responsible, respectively, for vowel-lengthening before voiced homorganic consonant clusters (OE LOE/EME ) and vowel shortening before other clusters (OE > ME ). This paper builds on reassessments of data by Minkova (2014) to contribute an account of HCL within the system of “preference laws” articulated by Vennemann (1988). This account attributes the motivation for HCL to preferences for syllable-internal transitions between nucleus and coda in order to explain the fine details of HCL; namely, the fact that HCL applies with higher frequency to high vowels followed nasals than to low/mid vowels and in a sporadic manner to front vowels followed by /l/ compared to back vowels. These differences are attributed to the application of the Coda and Nucleus Laws (Vennemann 1988: 25, 42), with additional proposals about the effect of velarization of /l/ in Old English, with comparison to PCS providing important context throughout.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Campbell, Alistair
    1959Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eliason, Norman E.
    1948 Old English Vowel Lengthening and Vowel Shortening before Consonant Groups. Studies in Philology45.1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hogg, Richard M.
    1992A Grammar of Old English: Vol I. Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hooper, Joan B.
    1976An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Howell, Robert B.
    1991Old English Breaking and its Germanic Analogues. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111356501
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111356501 [Google Scholar]
  6. Huber, Daniel
    2008 Velars and Processes: Their Treatment in Phonological Theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest.
  7. Krupatkin, Y. B.
    1970 From Germanic to English and Frisian. Us Wurk19:3.49–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lass, Roger
    1994Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621000
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621000 [Google Scholar]
  9. Lehiste, I.
    1972 Manner of Articulation, Parallel Processing, and the Perception of Duration. Working Papers Linguistics and Computer and Information Science Research Center, Ohio State University12.33–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liberman, Anatoly
    1992 Vowel Lengthening before Resonant + Another Consonant and Svarabhakti in Germanic. On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 68) ed. byI. Rauch, G. F. Carr & R. L. Kyes, 163–215. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110856446.163
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856446.163 [Google Scholar]
  11. Luick, Karl
    1898 Beiträge zur Englischen Grammatik III. Die Quantitätsveränderungen im Lauf der englischen Sprachentwicklung. Anglia20.335–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1914–1940Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Leipzig [Repr. 1921. Stuttgart: Tauchnitz].
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lutz, Angelika
    1986 The Syllabic Basis of Word Division in Old English Manuscripts. English Studies67.193–210. 10.1080/00138388608598441
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138388608598441 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mailhammer, Robert
    2009 Thoughts on the Genesis and the Development of Syllable Cut in English. Anglia127.261–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mailhammer, Robert, David Restle & Theo Vennemann
    2015 Preference Laws in Phonological Change. The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonologyed. byJ. Salmons & P. Honeybone, 450–466. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Malsch, Derry L.
    1976 Syllable, Mora, and Length in the Development of English. Current Progress in Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Historical Linguisticsed. byW. M. Christie, 83–93. Amsterdam: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Minkova, Donka
    2014A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Minkova, Donka & Robert P. Stockwell
    1992 Homorganic Clusters as Moric Busters in the History of English: The Case of -ld, -nd, -mb. History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguisticsed. byM. T. Rissanen, O. Ihalainen, T. Nevalainen, and I. Taavitsainen, 191–207. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110877007.191
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877007.191 [Google Scholar]
  19. Moon, An-Nah
    2004 Constraints on Homorganic Cluster Lengthening in Early English: A Unified Account of Vowel Lengthening and Shortening. Language Research40:2.353–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Morsbach, Lorenz
    1888Ueber den Ursprung der neuenglischen Schriftsprache. Heilbroon: Henniager.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Murray, Robert W.
    2000 Syllable Cut Prosody in Early Middle English. Language76.617–654. 10.2307/417137
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417137 [Google Scholar]
  22. Murray, Robert W. & Theo Vennemann
    1982 Syllable Contact Change in Germanic, Greek and Sidamo. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft8.321–349.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1983 Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology. Language59.514–528. 10.2307/413901
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413901 [Google Scholar]
  24. Parker, Stephen G.
    2002 Quantifying the Sonority Hierarchy. University of Massachusetts, Doctoral Dissertation.
  25. Phillips, Betty S.
    1981 The Phonetic Basis of a Late Old English Sound Change. Phonologica 1980ed. byW. U. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer & J. R. Rennison, 337–341. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1983 Constraints on Syllables and Quantitative Changes in Early English. Linguistics21.879–895.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prokosch, E.
    1939A Comparative Germanic Grammar. University of Pennsylvania: Linguistic Society of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Restle, David
    2003Silbenschnitt – Quantität – Kopplung: Zur Geschichte, Charakterisierung und Typologie der Anschlußprosodie. München: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ritt, Nikolaus
    1994Quantity Adjustment: Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597831
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597831 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sievers, Eduard
    1901Grundzüge der Phonetik: Zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5th ed.Leipzig: Breitkopf & Haertel.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smirnitsky, A. I.
    1946 Problems of Phonology in the History of the English Language (Russian). Vestnik MGU2.81–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Trubetzkoy, Nikolaj
    1939Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Vennemann, Theo
    1988Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2000 From Quantity to Syllable Cuts: On So-called Lengthening in the Germanic Languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics12.251–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wyld, Henry C.
    1929A Short History of English. 3rd ed.London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error