Morphological exceptionality and pathways of change

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2003 A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107050952
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050952 [Google Scholar]
2. Andersen, Henning
   1987 From Auxiliary to Desinence. Historical Development of Auxiliariesed. byMartin Harris & Paolo Ramat, 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110856910.21
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856910.21 [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, Stephen R.
   2001 On Some Issues of Morphological Exponence. Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 1–18.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mark, & Willie Udo Willie
   2010 Agreement in Ibibio: From Every Head to Every Head. Syntax13:2.99–132. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2009.00133.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00133.x [Google Scholar]
5. Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra P. Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll
   2007 Free Prefix Ordering in Chintang. Language83:1.43–73. 10.1353/lan.2007.0002
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0002 [Google Scholar]
6. Blevins, Juliette
   2009 Another Universal Bites the Dust: Northwest Mekeo Lacks Coronal Phonemes. Oceanic Linguistics48:1.264–273. 10.1353/ol.0.0033
   https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0033 [Google Scholar]
7. Caballero, Gabriella & Alice C. Harris
   2012 A Working Typology of Multiple Exponence: Cross-linguistic Variation and Theoretical Implications. Current Issues in Morphological Theory: (Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency. Selected Papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, 13–16 May 2010ed. byFerenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi, & Péter Siptár, 163–188. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.322.08cab
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.322.08cab [Google Scholar]
8. Denk, Lukas
   2015 Towards a Typology of Multiple Agreement: Synchronic and Diachronic Case Studies from Eight Languages. MA Thesis, University of Regensburg, Regensburg.
9. Donohue, Mark
   1999 Skou: A Most Agreeable Language. Presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society, Perth, 30September 1999.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Doornenbal, Marius
    2009 A Grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, Paradigm Tables, Glossary and Texts of a Rai Language of Eastern Nepal. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Driem, George van
    1987 A Grammar of Limbu. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110846812
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846812 [Google Scholar]
12. Driem, George van
    1990 An Exploration of Proto-Kiranti Verbal Morphology. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia22.27–48. 10.1080/03740463.1990.10411521
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1990.10411521 [Google Scholar]
13. Driem, George van
    1991 Bahing and the Proto-Kiranti Verb. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies54.336–356. 10.1017/S0041977X00014828
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00014828 [Google Scholar]
14. Driem, George van
    1993 Dumi. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110880915
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880915 [Google Scholar]
15. Driem, George van
    1994 The Yakkha Verb: Interpretation and Analysis of the Omruwa Material (A Kiranti Language of Eastern Nepal). Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies57.347–355. 10.1017/S0041977X00024915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00024915 [Google Scholar]
16. Driem, George van
    1997 New Analysis of the Limbu Verb. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Driem, George van
    2001 Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ebert, Karen
    1997a A Grammar of Athpare. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ebert, Karen
    1997b Camling (Chamling). Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Emmerick, Ronald
    1987 Auxiliaries in Khotanese. Historical Development of Auxiliariesed. byMartin Harris & Paolo Ramat, 271–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110856910.271
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856910.271 [Google Scholar]
21. Grossman, Eitan
    2016 From Rarum to Rarissimum: An Unexpected Zero Person Marker. Linguistic Typology20:1.1–23. 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Grossman, Eitan, Anton Antonov & Guillaume Jacques
    2018 A Cross-Linguistic Rarity in Synchrony and Diachrony: Adverbial Subordinator Prefixes Exist. STUF – Language Typology and Universals71:4.513–538. 10.1515/stuf‑2018‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
23. Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
    2018 Swimming against the Typological Tide or Paddling along with Language Change? Dispreferred Structures and Diachronic Biases in Affix Ordering. Journal of Historical Linguistics8:3.388–443. 10.1075/jhl.17027.gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17027.gro [Google Scholar]
24. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. The view from building 20ed. byKen Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harris, Alice C.
    2003 The Challenge of Typologically Unusual Structures. Morphology and Linguistic Typology, On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003ed. byGeert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise, 277–284.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hodgson, Brian
    1880 Miscellaneous Essays Relating to Indian Subjects, Vol.1. London: Trubner.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jacques, Guillaume, Aimee Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai
    2012 An Overview of Khaling Verbal Morphology. Language and Linguistics13.1095–1170.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jacques, Guillaume
    2017 A Reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti Verb Roots. Folia Linguistica Historica38.77–215.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jacques, Guillaume
    2018 Bipartite Verbs in Japhug and Other Trans-Himalayan Languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area41:2.175–191. 10.1075/ltba.17012.jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17012.jac [Google Scholar]
30. Michailovsky, Boyd
    1994 Manner vs Place of Articulation in the Kiranti Initial Stops. Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, 766–772.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Michailovsky, Boyd
    2010 Preliminaries to the Comparative Study of the Kiranti Subgroup of Tibeto-Burman. Proceedings ofthe International Symposium on Sino-Tibetan Comparative Studies in the 21st Century, 145–170. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Opgenort, Jean Robert
    2004 A Grammar of Wambule: Grammar, Lexicon, Texts and Cultural Survey of a Kiranti Tribe of Eastern Nepal. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Opgenort, Jean Robert
    2005 A Grammar of Jero: With a Historical Comparative Study of the Kiranti Languages. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Saltarelli, Mario
    1988 Basque. New York: Croon Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schikowski, Robert
    2012 Chintang Morphology. Unpublished Ms, University of Zürich.
36. Sharma, Narayan P.
    2014 The Morphosyntax of Puma, a Tibeto-Burman Language of Nepal. Dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London.
37. Steele, Susan
    1995 Towards a Theory of Morphological Information. Language71.260–309. 10.2307/416164
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416164 [Google Scholar]
38. Tolsma, Gerard
    2006 A Grammar of Kulung. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tumbahang, Govinda
    2007 A Descriptive Grammar of Chhatthare Limbu. Dissertation, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal.
40. Weidert, Alfons & Bikram Subba
    1985 Concise Limbu Grammar and Dictionary. Amsterdam: Lobster Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw
    2010 Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110228557
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110228557 [Google Scholar]