Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article reviews The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese



Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
    2014Old Chinese: a New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxter, William H. III
    1992A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 64]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857085
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodman, Nicolas
    1980 Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: Data towards Establishing the Nature of the Relationship. Contributions to Historical Linguistics: Issues and Materials, ed. by Frans van Coetsem & Linda R. Waugh , 34–199. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bodt, Tim & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Testing the Predictive Strength of the Comparative Method: An Ongoing Experiment on Unattested Words in Western Kho-Bwa Languages. Papers in Historical Phonology4.22–44. 10.2218/pihph.4.2019.3037
    https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.4.2019.3037 [Google Scholar]
  5. Coblin, Weldon South
    1976 Notes on Tibetan Verbal Morphology. T’oung Pao62(1/3). 45–70. 10.1163/156853276X00034
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853276X00034 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1986A Sinologist’s Handlist of Sino-Tibetan Lexical Comparisons. Sankt Augustin: Steyler Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2002 On Certain Functions of ’A-chung In Early Tibetan Transcriptional texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area25:2. 169–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Conrady, August
    1896Eine indochinesische causativ-denominativ-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Doornenbal, Marius
    2009 A Grammar of Bantawa. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden, Leiden University.
  10. van Driem, George
    1993A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110880915
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880915 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2011 Tibeto-Burman Subgroups and Historical Grammar. Himalayan Linguistics10:1. 31–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fellner, Hannes A. & Nathan W. Hill
    2019a The Differing Status of Reconstruction in Trans-Himalayan and Indo-European. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 159–172. 10.1163/19606028‑04802006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04802006 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2019b Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 91–124. 10.1163/19606028‑04802001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04802001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gong, Hwang-cherng
    1977 Gǔ zàngwén de y jíqí xiāngguān wèntí古藏 文的y及其相關問題 [Old Tibetan y and related problems]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology48:2. 205–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1980 A Comparative Study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese Vowel Systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology51:3. 455–490.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1995 The System of Finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. The Ancestry of Chinese, ed. by William S-.-Y. Wang , 41–92. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong, Xun
    2016 A Phonological History of Amdo Tibetan Rhymes. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies79:2. 347–374. 10.1017/S0041977X16000070
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X16000070 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2017 Jiāróng yǔzǔ yǔyán yǔ shànggǔ hànyǔ de xíngtàixué嘉绒语组语言与上古汉语的形态学. ed. by Haeree Park & Shaoxuan Cheng , 134–156, gǔ wénzì yǔ hànyǔ lìshǐ yīnyùnxué 古文字与汉语历史音韵学 复旦中 华文明研究专刊. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018 Le rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest : une étude descriptive, typologique et comparative. Doctoral dissertation, Paris, Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales.
  20. Handel, Zev
    2019 A Brief Response to Fellner and Hill’s “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 125–141. 10.1163/19606028‑04802003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04802003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill, Nathan W.
    2005a Once More on the Letter ’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area28:2. 111–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2005b The Verb ’bri ‘to write’ in Old Tibetan. Journal of Asian and African Studies68. 177–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009 Tibetan <h> as a Plain Initial and its Place in Old Tibetan phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area32:1. 115–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2013 Relative Ordering of Tibetan Sound Changes Affecting Laterals. Language and Linguistics14:1. 193–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2014a Grammatically Conditioned Sound Change. Language and Linguistics Compass8:6. 211–229. 10.1111/lnc3.12073
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12073 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2014b Some Tibetan Verb Forms that Violate Dempsey’s Law. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines29. 91–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2014c Tibetan. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, ed. by Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer , 620–630. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2016a A refutation of Song’s (2014) Explanation of the ’Stop Coda Problem’ in Old Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics3:2. 270–281. 10.1075/ijchl.3.2.04hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.3.2.04hil [Google Scholar]
  29. 2016b Tibetan *-as > -os. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Reconstruction12. 163–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2019a The derivation of the Tibetan Present Prefix g- from ḥ-. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae72:3. 325–332. 10.1556/062.2019.72.3.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/062.2019.72.3.4 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2019bThe historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316550939
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316550939 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hill, Nathan W. & Johann-Mattis List
    2017 Challenges of Annotation and Analysis in Computer-Assisted Language Comparison: A Case Study on Burmish Languages. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting3:1. 47–76. 10.1515/yplm‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hyslop, Gwendolyn
    2017A Grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004328747
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004328747 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacques, Guillaume
    2004 Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). Doctoral dissertation, Paris, Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot.
  35. 2007 Le nom des nakṣatrāṇi en tibétain. Revue d’études tibétaines12. 4–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010 A Possible Trace of Verbal Agreement in Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics9:1. 41–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2013 On pre-Tibetan Semi-vowels. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies76:2. 289–300. 10.1017/S0041977X12001450
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X12001450 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014 On Coblin’s law. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, ed. by Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken , 155–166. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2016 Le sino-tibétain: polysynthétique ou isolant?Faits de langues47:1. 61–74. 10.1163/19589514‑047‑01‑900000004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-047-01-900000004 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2017 A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti Verb Roots. Folia Linguistica Historica38. 177–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2019 The Labial Causative in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of the South-East Asian Linguistic Society12:1. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jacques, Guillaume , Aimée Lahaussois , Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai
    2012 An Overview of Khaling Verbal Morphology. Language and Linguistics13:6. 1095–1170.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lejeune, Michel
    1987Phonétique historique du mycénien et du grec ancien. Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, Fang-Kuei
    1933 Certain Phonetic Influences of the Tibetan Prefixes upon the Root Initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology6:2. 135–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 1959 Tibetan Glo-ba-’dring. Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren dedicata, ed by. Søren Egerod & Else Glahn . Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, 55–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lin, Youjing
    2016 Jiāróngyǔ Zhuókèjīhuà yǔfǎ biāozhù wénběn嘉戎语卓 克基话语法标注文本 [Cogtse Rgyalrong Texts: Fully Analyzed Spontaeous Narratives with an Updated Sketch Grammar of the Language]. Beijing: Shehui Kexue chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mao, Zongwu
    1992 Hàn-Yáo cídiǎn (miǎnyǔ)汉 瑶 词 典 (勉 语) [A Chinese-Mien dictionary]. Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Matisoff, James A.
    2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Meillet, Antoine
    1975 [1921]Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Michailovsky, Boyd
    2002Limbu-English Dictionary. Kathmandu: Mandala Book Point.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Michaud, Alexis
    2012 Monosyllabicization: Patterns of Evolution in Asian languages. Monosyllables: from Phonology to Typologyed. by Thomas Stolz , Nicole Nau & Cornelia Stroh , 115–130. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ratliff, Martha
    2010Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sagart, Laurent , Guillaume Jacques , Yunfan Lai , Robin J. Ryder , Valentin Thouzeau , Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Dated Language Phylogenies Shed Light on the Ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116:21. 10317–10322. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1817972116. https://www.pnas.org/content/116/21/10317
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817972116 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schiefner, Anton
    1852 Tibetischen Studien. Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin historico-philologique de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.Pétersbourg1. 324–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schuessler, Axel
    2015 New Old Chinese. Diachronica32:4. 571–598. 10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch [Google Scholar]
  56. 2019 Comments on Fellner and Hill: “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 142–153. 10.1163/19606028‑04802004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04802004 [Google Scholar]
  57. Shefts-Chang, Betty
    1971 The Tibetan Causative: Phonology. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology42:4. 623–765.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Snellgrove, David
    1967The Nine Ways of Bon: Excerpts from gZi-brjid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Starostin, Sergej Anatoljevich
    1989 Реконструкция древнекитайской фонологической системы [A Reconstruction of the Old Chinese Phonological System]. Moskva: Nauka.
  60. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2000 Parallelisms in the Verb Morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics1:1. 161–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Thurgood, Graham
    2019 A Review of Fellner and Hill’s “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 154–158. 10.1163/19606028‑04802007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04802007 [Google Scholar]
  62. Thurgood, Graham & Randy LaPolla
    (eds.) 2017The Sino-Tibetan languages. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. VanBik, Kenneth
    2009Proto Kuki-Chin. Berkeley, CA: STEDT Monograph.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang, Fushi & Zongwu Mao
    1995 Miáoyáoyǔ gǔyīn gòunǐ苗瑶语古音构 拟 [A Reconstruction of proto-Miao-Yao]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang, William S.-Y.
    1969 Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue. Language45:1. 9–25. 10.2307/411748
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411748 [Google Scholar]
  66. Zeisler, Bettina
    2015 Eat and drink – if you can! A Language Internal Explanation for the ‘Irregular’ Paradigm of Tibetan za, zos, zo ‘eat’. Himalayan Linguistics14:1. 34–62. 10.5070/H914125303
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H914125303 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2017 Hypothetical Sound Laws and Sound Potential Meaning. Once Again on the Uncommon Tibetan Verb Paradigm za, zos, zo ‘eat’. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction14. 77–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang, Shuya , Guillaume Jacques & Yunfan Lai
    2019 A Study of Cognates between Gyalrong Languages and Old Chinese. Journal of Language Relationship7:1. 73–92.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error