1980 Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: Data towards Establishing the Nature of the Relationship. Contributions to Historical Linguistics: Issues and Materials, ed. by
Frans van Coetsem
&
Linda R. Waugh
, 34–199. Leiden: Brill.
2019 Testing the Predictive Strength of the Comparative Method: An Ongoing Experiment on Unattested Words in Western Kho-Bwa Languages. Papers in Historical Phonology4.22–44. 10.2218/pihph.4.2019.3037
2019a The Differing Status of Reconstruction in Trans-Himalayan and Indo-European. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 159–172. 10.1163/19606028‑04802006
1977 Gǔ zàngwén de y jíqí xiāngguān wèntí古藏 文的y及其相關問題 [Old Tibetan y and related problems]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology48:2. 205–228.
1995 The System of Finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. The Ancestry of Chinese, ed. by
William S-.-Y. Wang
, 41–92. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series.
2018 Le rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest : une étude descriptive, typologique et comparative. Doctoral dissertation, Paris, Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales.
Handel, Zev
2019 A Brief Response to Fellner and Hill’s “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 125–141. 10.1163/19606028‑04802003
2016a A refutation of Song’s (2014) Explanation of the ’Stop Coda Problem’ in Old Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics3:2. 270–281. 10.1075/ijchl.3.2.04hil
2017 Challenges of Annotation and Analysis in Computer-Assisted Language Comparison: A Case Study on Burmish Languages. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting3:1. 47–76. 10.1515/yplm‑2017‑0003
2014 On Coblin’s law. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, ed. by
Richard VanNess Simmons
&
Newell Ann Van Auken
, 155–166. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
2012 Monosyllabicization: Patterns of Evolution in Asian languages. Monosyllables: from Phonology to Typologyed. by
Thomas Stolz
,
Nicole Nau
&
Cornelia Stroh
, 115–130. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
1852 Tibetischen Studien. Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin historico-philologique de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.Pétersbourg1. 324–394.
2019 Comments on Fellner and Hill: “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 142–153. 10.1163/19606028‑04802004
2019 A Review of Fellner and Hill’s “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale48:2. 154–158. 10.1163/19606028‑04802007
2015 Eat and drink – if you can! A Language Internal Explanation for the ‘Irregular’ Paradigm of Tibetan za, zos, zo ‘eat’. Himalayan Linguistics14:1. 34–62. 10.5070/H914125303
2017 Hypothetical Sound Laws and Sound Potential Meaning. Once Again on the Uncommon Tibetan Verb Paradigm za, zos, zo ‘eat’. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction14. 77–117.