1887
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.21012.dah
2021-07-23
2021-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldai, Gontzal
    2008 From Ergative Case Marking to Semantic Case Marking: The Case of Historical Basque. InDonohue & Wichmann (eds.) 2008, 197–218. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldridge, Edith
    2011 Antipassive in Austronesian Alignment Change. Grammatical Change. Origins, Nature, Outcomes (2012) ed. byDianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 332–346. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582624.003.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582624.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2015 A Minimalist Approach to the Emergence of Ergativity in Austronesian Languages. Linguistics Vanguard1:1.313–326. 10.1515/lingvan‑2014‑1011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1011 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2016 Ergativity from Subjunctive in Austronesian Languages. Language and Linguistics17:1.27–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2017 Intransitivity and the Development of Ergative Alignment. InCoon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 501–529. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.21
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.21 [Google Scholar]
  6. Butt, Miriam & Ashwini Deo
    2017 Developments into and out of Ergativity: Indo-Aryan Diachrony. InCoon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 531–552. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.22
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.22 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coghill, Eleanor
    2016The Rise & Fall of Ergativity in Aramaic. Cycles of Alignment Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723806.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723806.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coon, Jessica, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis
    (eds.) 2017The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cristofaro, Sonia & Fernando Zúñiga
    (eds.) 2018.Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.121
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahl, Eystein
    2016 The Origin and Development of the Old Indo-Aryan Predicated -tá Construction. InDahl & Stroński (eds.) 2016a, 63–110. 10.1075/tsl.112.03dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.112.03dah [Google Scholar]
  12. ed. In preparation. Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahl, Eystein & Krzysztof Stroński
    (eds.) 2016aIndo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.112 [Google Scholar]
  14. Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann
    (eds.) 2008The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gildea, Spike
    1997 Evolution of Grammatical Relations in Cariban: How Functional Motivation Precedes Syntactic Change. Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspectiveed. byTalmy Givón, 155–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.35.04gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.35.04gil [Google Scholar]
  16. Gildea, Spike & Fernando Zuñiga
    2016 Referential Hierarchies: A New Look at Some Historical and Typological Patterns. Linguistics54:3.483–529. 10.1515/ling‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Haig, Geoffrey
    2017 Deconstructing Iranian Ergativity. InCoon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 465–500. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.20
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.20 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris, Alice C.
    1985Diachronic Syntax. The Kartvelian Case. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004373143
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373143 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hasselbach, Rebecca
    2013Case in Semitic. Roles, Relations, and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671809.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671809.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  21. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju
    2003The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486876
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486876 [Google Scholar]
  22. Law, Danny
    2017 Changes to Alignment in Mayan Languages So Far. Paper presented at theICHL 23 workshop, Alignment Typology in Diachronic Perspective, 4 August 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lehman, Thomas
    1998 Old Tamil. The Dravidian Languagesed. bySanford B. Steever, 75–99. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Polinski, Maria
    2016Deconstructing Ergativity. Two Types of Ergative Languages and Their Features. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Seržant, Ilja & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
    (eds.) 2018The Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Whitman, John & Yuko Yanagida
    2012 The Formal Syntax of Alignment Change. Parameter Theory and Linguistic Changeed. byCharlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar, 177–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zuñiga, Fernando
    2018 The Diachrony of Morphosyntactic Alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass12.1–21. 10.1111/lnc3.12300
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12300 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.21012.dah
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error